Domain: %5b127.0.0.1%5d
Stories and comments across the archive that link to %5b127.0.0.1%5d.
Comments · 5
-
Re:Hmm...
you mean the email address, so a spammer can harvest it is
uce@ftc.gov
abuse@[127.0.0.1]
abuse@127.0.0.1
--joshua -
Re:Poison? How about crasher?
The speed of poisoning depends on what poison you use...
I tend to think a spammer with an address database containing root@localhost, postmaster@localhost, abuse@localhost, root@localhost.localdomain, , abuse@localhost.localdomain, root@[127.0.0.1], postmaster@[127.0.0.1], abuse@[127.0.0.1], and uce@ftc.gov wouldn't have too much fun before being kicked by his ISP.
Unfortunately, many spambots are probably intelligent enough to filter out the common variants of these... -
Re:Poison? How about crasher?
The speed of poisoning depends on what poison you use...
I tend to think a spammer with an address database containing root@localhost, postmaster@localhost, abuse@localhost, root@localhost.localdomain, , abuse@localhost.localdomain, root@[127.0.0.1], postmaster@[127.0.0.1], abuse@[127.0.0.1], and uce@ftc.gov wouldn't have too much fun before being kicked by his ISP.
Unfortunately, many spambots are probably intelligent enough to filter out the common variants of these... -
Re:Poison? How about crasher?
The speed of poisoning depends on what poison you use...
I tend to think a spammer with an address database containing root@localhost, postmaster@localhost, abuse@localhost, root@localhost.localdomain, , abuse@localhost.localdomain, root@[127.0.0.1], postmaster@[127.0.0.1], abuse@[127.0.0.1], and uce@ftc.gov wouldn't have too much fun before being kicked by his ISP.
Unfortunately, many spambots are probably intelligent enough to filter out the common variants of these... -
Re:O the humor...
Minor pet peeve: I'm blanking on which RFC specifies it (821?), but e-mail addresses that use IP addresses are supposed to enclose the IP address in brackets, like this: postmaster@[127.0.0.1]