Domain: abc3340.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to abc3340.com.
Comments · 5
-
Re:Voter ID
FWIU, you go to DMV with something like a birth certificate or SS card and you get a voter ID free of charge. What's the problem?
In rural areas, DMV offices are typically open 1 day a month or less. If your boss won't give you time off from work to get your ID, then you have to choose between getting fired and getting the vote. If you are living hand-to-mouth, as most poor people are forced to, then you pick keeping your job over being able to vote.
-
Re:Or for more comprehensive scanning
...And the ONLY reason it got as far as it did, was because of all the lame-ass website admins. who got infected by the fake banner ad, and then the genius move of then poisoning several Search Engines' Page Rank systems, so those sites came up high in search results. So, the REAL SUCCESSFUL "attack" was on those websites.
Clearly, you are not very informed about modern cybercrime. Mass website compromises are probably the main way malware is distributed nowadays (on any platform), either through drive-by downloads or by tricking the users (trojans). Macs are no different, now that they are big enough to be a target.
So, what you're saying is that my comment was correct. The fact that "it happens all the time, to everybody" should not be seen as an inevitability; but rather a rallying cry to tighten up webservers and website design.
There is absolutely no reason why an outside attacker should be able to inject anything in the web-content delivery process, other than the possibility of having a lazy admin serve up a malicious banner ad. And that can be taken care of by the admins themselves, banning that lazy ad service from their site. Eventually, that works up the chain, and the people actually responsible for accepting the malicious ad will learn to be more careful. -
Re:Or for more comprehensive scanning
...And the ONLY reason it got as far as it did, was because of all the lame-ass website admins. who got infected by the fake banner ad, and then the genius move of then poisoning several Search Engines' Page Rank systems, so those sites came up high in search results. So, the REAL SUCCESSFUL "attack" was on those websites.
Clearly, you are not very informed about modern cybercrime. Mass website compromises are probably the main way malware is distributed nowadays (on any platform), either through drive-by downloads or by tricking the users (trojans). Macs are no different, now that they are big enough to be a target.
-
Re:Or for more comprehensive scanning
Seriously now that there is blood in the water the sharks will come, and it will only get worse. they saw they were able to get some good numbers with MacDefender and now MacGuard, and thanks to Hackentosh they don't even need to buy an Apple to test their code on! The first Windows bugs were pretty primitive and easy to kill too. I remember when a simple booting into safe mode and tossing the files would kill a great number of bugs. Mark my words this is just the beginning, within 6 months I predict we'll be seeing our first really nasty deep buried Apple malware. Who knows, we may even see an Apple Code Red style mass infection!
Yeah, their "Pretty Good Numbers" were measured in maybe a few hundred Macs, worldwide. Yeah, that's some epidemic. And the ONLY reason it got as far as it did, was because of all the lame-ass website admins. who got infected by the fake banner ad, and then the genius move of then poisoning several Search Engines' Page Rank systems, so those sites came up high in search results. So, the REAL SUCCESSFUL "attack" was on those websites. And I would bet my bottom dollar that the vast majority of infections were of gullible Windows-Switchers, who cannot fathom a computer platform that DOESN'T regularly need "Virus Scans". The veteran Mac users KNOW better! (Yes, I'm being smug).
Oh, and one of the reasons this will NEVER get to the level of a Windows problem is simple: Macs don't have a "Registry", in the sense that Windows does. Without that idiotic, centralized database of thousands of system and application settings, it is literally impossible to create malware that can survive simple file-replacement techniques. The problem is that there is literally NO reliable mechanism to "rebuild" a seriously damaged Registry. Microsoft can't do it, Third Parties can't do it, and users DAMN sure can't do it!
This is why SO many problems with Windows end with the tried-and-true mantra of "Wipe and Reload" (a/k/a the "back off and nuke it from orbit" method). Because, quite literally, it is often the ONLY way to be sure.
But, since Apple uses .plist files, and since the rule is that they can be REBUILT if deleted, it's gonna be pretty damned hard for something to really scrog an OS X system. At least in a way that cannot be relatively easily "rebuilt".
And that tune you've been singing has been sung for over ELEVEN years now, and what? Heck, even Linux has much, much more "malware" that OS X. In fact, over 250 times as much. -
Scientist Do Not Agree
From the Senate:
There are opposing positions to Al Gore's propaganda movie, "An Inconvenient Truth." There are opposing views that should be discussed.
No one diputes the fact that the Earth is warming. However, there is not scientific consensus that it is caused, or substantially increased, by humans. The inconvenient truth that Gore fails to mention is that about 10,000 years ago, the Earth was so warm that citrus fruits were growing in what is now northern Germany.
There were no cars and precious few people to cause the Earth to be so warm. That period was followed by an ice age. When the ice age ended, the Earth began warming, and has been warming ever since. It will continue to warm, until another ice age occurs.
Many publications on global warming deliberately leave out these facts, so as to lend credence to the theory that we are causing global warming. The culprit is not the Earth's habitants; it is the sun, which we sometimes see in the Pacific Northwest. The Earth has been in a continual cycle of heating and cooling, and there is nothing we can to about it. That's another "inconvenient truth."
Muzzling attempt?
AMS CERTIFIED WEATHERMAN STRIKES BACK AT WEATHER CHANNEL CALL FOR DECERTIFICATION January 19, 2007
Check out this blog post from James Spann:
From his blog - his bio:
"In 2005 I upgraded the AMS seal of approval to the new "Certified Broadcast Meteorologist" designation. The CBM is the highest level of certification from the AMS, and involves academic requirements, on-air performance, a rigorous examination, and continuing education. I am CBM number 33, meaning I am the 33rd person in the nation to earn it. I wanted to be the first in Alabama, but a couple of guys in Huntsville beat me to it. Just not enough hours in the day!
January 18, 2007 | James Spann | Op/Ed
Well, well. Some "climate expert" on "The Weather Channel" wants to take away AMS certification from those of us who believe the recent "global warming" is a natural process. So much for "tolerance", huh?
I have been in operational meteorology since 1978, and I know dozens and dozens of broadcast meteorologists all over the country. Our big job: look at a large volume of raw data and come up with a public weather forecast for the next seven days. I do not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype. I know there must be a few out there, but I can't find them. Here are the basic facts you need to know:
*Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story. Even the lady at "The Weather Channel" probably gets paid good money for a prime time show on climate change. No man-made global warming, no show, and no salary. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab.
*The climate of this planet has been changing since God put the planet here. It will always change, and the warming in the last 10 years is not much difference than the warming we saw in the 1930s and other decades. And, lets not forget we are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North America and Northern Europe.
If you don't like to listen to me, find another meteorologist with no tie t