Slashdot Mirror

What a cynical world? If any lone inventor proposes a revolutionary idea, he is attacked mercilessly to submission. Usually these inventors are lone geeks with lesser social skills and shy to take on ignorant critics.

I have a friend who has invented a solution for online GUI components, which may be used to build complex online application, than possible before even on desktop platforms such as Windows or Apple computer systems, at fraction of cost. When he was presented privately to potential partners/investors, he was insulted.

He also proposed a revolutionary component based software paradigm, which can alleviate so called software crisis.

These technologies are not complex and any qualified software engineer can validate in hours. He posted all the information on e web site, http://www.cbsdf.com./ Still few people calling him fool and fraud, with out showing a shred of evidence that his technologies have any flaw. http://www.cbsdf.com/technologies/DHTML-Widgets/TE CH-Summary.htm

He has posted necessary basic source code in the web site. Any junior developer can use this to create complex online GUI applications, which is practically impossible to top researchers at Google or Microsoft.

The world is so cynical that no qualified person willing to spend couple of hours to verify themselves. A single individual cannot build and provide full-fledged products and services to get this into market. Until fellow researchers verify this and acknowledge their experience, such technologies do not attract customers and investors to bring it market.

If such technologies do not reach market or delayed for several years, whom do you think biggest losers? The inventor who created out of his curiosity or the world? Who is going to suffer the consequences? Such inventions can add trillions of dollars to world economy and energy independence to poor countries.

They should have posted all the process to construct a device openly as my friend hosted in http://www.cbsdf.com./ Showing to 20 experts do not help them. They will demand them to jump many hoops. At the end after they are convinced, my friend says that most of the so-called experts will be gutless to stick their neck for the disruptive invention for the fear of wrath from others. If inventor asks them to say it publicly, they ask them to jump more hoops. After enduring costs and humiliation, one has to give up.

I don't know about the free energy, but I know cynics killed other good inventions. Please don't call them fraud, just because you are too lazy and incompetent to validate the invention.

What a cynical world? If any lone inventor proposes a revolutionary idea, he is attacked mercilessly to submission. Usually these inventors are lone geeks with lesser social skills and shy to take on ignorant critics.

I have a friend who has invented a solution for online GUI components, which may be used to build complex online application, than possible before even on desktop platforms such as Windows or Apple computer systems, at fraction of cost. When he was presented privately to potential partners/investors, he was insulted.

He also proposed a revolutionary component based software paradigm, which can alleviate so called software crisis.

These technologies are not complex and any qualified software engineer can validate in hours. He posted all the information on e web site, http://www.cbsdf.com./ Still few people calling him fool and fraud, with out showing a shred of evidence that his technologies have any flaw. http://www.cbsdf.com/technologies/DHTML-Widgets/TE CH-Summary.htm

He has posted necessary basic source code in the web site. Any junior developer can use this to create complex online GUI applications, which is practically impossible to top researchers at Google or Microsoft.

The world is so cynical that no qualified person willing to spend couple of hours to verify themselves. A single individual cannot build and provide full-fledged products and services to get this into market. Until fellow researchers verify this and acknowledge their experience, such technologies do not attract customers and investors to bring it market.

If such technologies do not reach market or delayed for several years, whom do you think biggest losers? The inventor who created out of his curiosity or the world? Who is going to suffer the consequences? Such inventions can add trillions of dollars to world economy and energy independence to poor countries.

They should have posted all the process to construct a device openly as my friend hosted in http://www.cbsdf.com./ Showing to 20 experts do not help them. They will demand them to jump many hoops. At the end after they are convinced, my friend says that most of the so-called experts will be gutless to stick their neck for the disruptive invention for the fear of wrath from others. If inventor asks them to say it publicly, they ask them to jump more hoops. After enduring costs and humiliation, one has to give up.

I don't know about the free energy, but I know cynics killed other good inventions. Please don't call them fraud, just because you are too lazy and incompetent to validate the invention.

What a cynical world? If any lone inventor proposes a revolutionary idea, he is attacked mercilessly to submission. Usually these inventors are lone geeks with lesser social skills and shy to take on ignorant critics.

I have a friend who has invented a solution for online GUI components, which may be used to build complex online application, than possible before even on desktop platforms such as Windows or Apple computer systems, at fraction of cost. When he was presented privately to potential partners/investors, he was insulted.

He also proposed a revolutionary component based software paradigm, which can alleviate so called software crisis.

These technologies are not complex and any qualified software engineer can validate in hours. He posted all the information on e web site, http://www.cbsdf.com./ Still few people calling him fool and fraud, with out showing a shred of evidence that his technologies have any flaw. http://www.cbsdf.com/technologies/DHTML-Widgets/TE CH-Summary.htm

He has posted necessary basic source code in the web site. Any junior developer can use this to create complex online GUI applications, which is practically impossible to top researchers at Google or Microsoft.

The world is so cynical that no qualified person willing to spend couple of hours to verify themselves. A single individual cannot build and provide full-fledged products and services to get this into market. Until fellow researchers verify this and acknowledge their experience, such technologies do not attract customers and investors to bring it market.

If such technologies do not reach market or delayed for several years, whom do you think biggest losers? The inventor who created out of his curiosity or the world? Who is going to suffer the consequences? Such inventions can add trillions of dollars to world economy and energy independence to poor countries.

They should have posted all the process to construct a device openly as my friend hosted in http://www.cbsdf.com./ Showing to 20 experts do not help them. They will demand them to jump many hoops. At the end after they are convinced, my friend says that most of the so-called experts will be gutless to stick their neck for the disruptive invention for the fear of wrath from others. If inventor asks them to say it publicly, they ask them to jump more hoops. After enduring costs and humiliation, one has to give up.

I don't know about the free energy, but I know cynics killed other good inventions. Please don't call them fraud, just because you are too lazy and incompetent to validate the invention.

What a cynical world? If any lone inventor proposes a revolutionary idea, he is attacked mercilessly to submission. Usually these inventors are lone geeks with lesser social skills and shy to take on ignorant critics.

I have a friend who has invented a solution for online GUI components, which may be used to build complex online application, than possible before even on desktop platforms such as Windows or Apple computer systems, at fraction of cost. When he was presented privately to potential partners/investors, he was insulted.

He also proposed a revolutionary component based software paradigm, which can alleviate so called software crisis.

These technologies are not complex and any qualified software engineer can validate in hours. He posted all the information on e web site, http://www.cbsdf.com./ Still few people calling him fool and fraud, with out showing a shred of evidence that his technologies have any flaw. http://www.cbsdf.com/technologies/DHTML-Widgets/TE CH-Summary.htm

He has posted necessary basic source code in the web site. Any junior developer can use this to create complex online GUI applications, which is practically impossible to top researchers at Google or Microsoft.

The world is so cynical that no qualified person willing to spend couple of hours to verify themselves. A single individual cannot build and provide full-fledged products and services to get this into market. Until fellow researchers verify this and acknowledge their experience, such technologies do not attract customers and investors to bring it market.

If such technologies do not reach market or delayed for several years, whom do you think biggest losers? The inventor who created out of his curiosity or the world? Who is going to suffer the consequences? Such inventions can add trillions of dollars to world economy and energy independence to poor countries.

They should have posted all the process to construct a device openly as my friend hosted in http://www.cbsdf.com./ Showing to 20 experts do not help them. They will demand them to jump many hoops. At the end after they are convinced, my friend says that most of the so-called experts will be gutless to stick their neck for the disruptive invention for the fear of wrath from others. If inventor asks them to say it publicly, they ask them to jump more hoops. After enduring several weeks, one has to give up.

I don't know about the free energy, but I know cynics killed other good inventions. Please don't call them fraud, just because you are too lazy and incompetent to validate the invention.

What a cynical world? If any lone inventor proposes a revolutionary idea, he is attacked mercilessly to submission. Usually these inventors are lone geeks with lesser social skills and shy to take on ignorant critics.

I have a friend who has invented a solution for online GUI components, which may be used to build complex online application, than possible before even on desktop platforms such as Windows or Apple computer systems, at fraction of cost. When he was presented privately to potential partners/investors, he was insulted.

He also proposed a revolutionary component based software paradigm, which can alleviate so called software crisis.

These technologies are not complex and any qualified software engineer can validate in hours. He posted all the information on e web site, http://www.cbsdf.com./ Still few people calling him fool and fraud, with out showing a shred of evidence that his technologies have any flaw. http://www.cbsdf.com/technologies/DHTML-Widgets/TE CH-Summary.htm

He has posted necessary basic source code in the web site. Any junior developer can use this to create complex online GUI applications, which is practically impossible to top researchers at Google or Microsoft.

The world is so cynical that no qualified person willing to spend couple of hours to verify themselves. A single individual cannot build and provide full-fledged products and services to get this into market. Until fellow researchers verify this and acknowledge their experience, such technologies do not attract customers and investors to bring it market.

If such technologies do not reach market or delayed for several years, whom do you think biggest losers? The inventor who created out of his curiosity or the world? Who is going to suffer the consequences? Such inventions can add trillions of dollars to world economy and energy independence to poor countries.

They should have posted all the process to construct a device openly as my friend hosted in http://www.cbsdf.com./ Showing to 20 experts do not help them. They will demand them to jump many hoops. At the end after they are convinced, my friend says that most of the so-called experts will be gutless to stick their neck for the disruptive invention for the fear of wrath from others. If inventor asks them to say it publicly, they ask them to jump more hoops. After enduring several weeks, one has to give up.

I don't know about the free energy, but I know cynics killed other good inventions. Please don't call them fraud, just because you are too lazy and incompetent to validate the invention.

What a cynical world? If any lone inventor proposes a revolutionary idea, he is attacked mercilessly to submission. Usually these inventors are lone geeks with lesser social skills and shy to take on ignorant critics.

I have a friend who has invented a solution for online GUI components, which may be used to build complex online application, than possible before even on desktop platforms such as Windows or Apple computer systems, at fraction of cost. When he was presented privately to potential partners/investors, he was insulted.

He also proposed a revolutionary component based software paradigm, which can alleviate so called software crisis.

These technologies are not complex and any qualified software engineer can validate in hours. He posted all the information on e web site, http://www.cbsdf.com./ Still few people calling him fool and fraud, with out showing a shred of evidence that his technologies have any flaw. http://www.cbsdf.com/technologies/DHTML-Widgets/TE CH-Summary.htm

He has posted necessary basic source code in the web site. Any junior developer can use this to create complex online GUI applications, which is practically impossible to top researchers at Google or Microsoft.

The world is so cynical that no qualified person willing to spend couple of hours to verify themselves. A single individual cannot build and provide full-fledged products and services to get this into market. Until fellow researchers verify this and acknowledge their experience, such technologies do not attract customers and investors to bring it market.

If such technologies do not reach market or delayed for several years, whom do you think biggest losers? The inventor who created out of his curiosity or the world? Who is going to suffer the consequences? Such inventions can add trillions of dollars to world economy and energy independence to poor countries.

They should have posted all the process to construct a device openly as my friend hosted in http://www.cbsdf.com./ Showing to 20 experts do not help them. They will demand them to jump many hoops. At the end after they are convinced, my friend says that most of the so-called experts will be gutless to stick their neck for the disruptive invention for the fear of wrath from others. If inventor asks them to say it publicly, they ask them to jump more hoops. After enduring several weeks, one has to give up.

I don't know about the free energy, but I know cynics killed other good inventions. Please don't call them fraud, just because you are too lazy and incompetent to validate the invention.