Slashdot Mirror

zeno_lee asks: "How do people deal with situations like this? Recently, we were cracked because our ISP failed to patch known security holes. They now want us to pay for them to patch up the holes. We are a bunch of dedicated volunteers who run a community web site we are developing using Apache/PHP/MySQL. The volunteers have nothing to gain except the rewards of bringing a national community together. We were cracked twice within 1 week of going live on the site. We are getting service from CommuniTech, who rent us a Cobalt Raq3 server. Part of the reason to go with a dedicate server from an ISP is to outsource system administration. No one amongst us is a full time computer security officer." One would think that when you pay for system administration, that security would be part of the deal. Looking at their FAQ, they give the impression that their servers are secure, so you'd think they would do something as simple as apply patches. Also, there is no mention of any extra charges for security on their pricing page, so does CommuniTech have any sensible reason for charging extra?

"We were cracked first within 5 days of our site going live. After paying communitech.net $62.50 for reinstalling the OS, it was cracked just 24 hours later. After speaking with Cobalt, they told us that our ISP, communitech.net, failed to patch up well publicized security holes on the Raq3. Acknowledging their failure, Communitech is not charging us for reinstalling the OS, but they are charging us $125 for someone to patch up the security hole. How blatantly unfair is that? I wanted the Slashdot community to be aware of the practices of such companies and see if others have had similar experiences and how they dealt with those situations.

We signed a 6 month contract, and we need options and strategies. What are the possible options we have? We just want a website running, we don't need to deal with all this bull."

mcwop writes "\ Looks like Cobalt Networks is suing Apple over their cube, according to ZDNet UK This is interesting because Cobalt Networks settled a lawsuit over their cube with Cube Computer Corp back in January. While they are both cubes one is specifically a server though the other could be used/marketed as one in the future. Technology and lawsuits seem to go hand in hand these days. " Basically, Cobalt has alleged that Apple has infringed on their trademarks. Oh, BTW, I've patented the shape "block". I'm going to be suing for past due royalties from humanity. My ownership of the block means that unlicensed use - like buildings are money to be made! Why didn't I think of this earlier?!

Got a Cobalt Raq 2, but want to keep your BSD fetish going? If so, Soren Jorvang's announcement of a prelimenary port to this particular piece of blue iron should be right up your street.

JeffRC wrote to us with a new machine from Gateway that looks remarkably like the Cobalt Qube. The device apparently runs Linux, with Apache and SMB. Update: 12/08 02:15 by H :Well, I am an idiot. If you remember, I had posted a story that GW and Cobalt would be teeming up - I guess this is the fruit of their alliance.