Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: dixiehomecrafters.com

Stories and comments across the archive that link to dixiehomecrafters.com.

Comments · 9

Re:who cares by TemporalBeing · 2010-08-24 09:24 · Score: 1 · on Scott Adams On the Difficulty of Building a 'Green' Home

There are some double pane windows that are better than the triple pane windows. See Low-E for more information. Here's one provider of Low-E, Double-pane Windows Dixie Home Crafts (though their Window website seems screwed up at the moment).
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.
Re:there is no way to win... by wolf- · 2002-04-24 10:10 · Score: 1 · on Text-Mining Your E-mail

I had it out on the phone with a "gentlemen" yesterday afternoon over the "do not call me". One of his employees, for the 3rd or 4rth time this week, rang ALL my potts lines, hanging up before we could answer them. Then when we managed to answer, asked for me. My wife said "he isn't available". So he talked to her about our being homeowners (we arent) and how his company (no good bastard telemarkters) can make us a deal on a new home or upgrades. She said she was not only not interested in doing business with him, she didnt want to be called again, and wanted on a no call list. She asked for his name, his phone number (at which point he hung up)...
Got to love caller id. Got the name, checked the website, called up and asked to speak to the owner.
I got David Parton on the line, who informed me that if I didnt want him to call me, that I should be put on the worthless GA No Call List. I informed him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 227. that the burden of compliance was on him and not on me. After being handled rudely, unprofessionally by the original caller, the founder had the nerve to DEFEND his people, their proceedures, and his attitudes.
Why do I say the GA No Call List is worthless? It is the LINE OWNERS who have to pay to be on the list! $5 per line for 2 years. I now have to pay to NOT have my dinner rudely interupted by an annoying unprofessional telemarketer who doesnt even have his "market" correct?
Sure, why not. I have to manage the loads of spam that comes through our company mail servers. I have to pay for the storage, the transport and processing of this junk. Why shouldnt I have to pay for telemarketers also?
The use of "marketers" in regards to spammers and "telemarketers" has been used loosly. As their shotgun methods of product placement doesnt match nearly anything taught in a true marketing course.