Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: ghacks.net

Stories and comments across the archive that link to ghacks.net.

Comments · 2,051

  1. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Why Stack Overflow Doesn't Care About Ad Blockers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  2. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Why Stack Overflow Doesn't Care About Ad Blockers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  3. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Why Stack Overflow Doesn't Care About Ad Blockers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  4. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Why Stack Overflow Doesn't Care About Ad Blockers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  5. PrivacyBadger = ABP code & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can PrivacyBadger do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on PrivacyBadger doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> PrivacyBadger does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    PrivacyBadger's Adblock+ codebase 128mb memory inefficiency http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay sees it by dumping addons used via native browser methods!

    +

    PrivacyBadger adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  6. PrivacyBadger = ABP code & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can PrivacyBadger do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on PrivacyBadger doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> PrivacyBadger does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    PrivacyBadger's Adblock+ codebase 128mb memory inefficiency http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay sees it by dumping addons used via native browser methods!

    +

    PrivacyBadger adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  7. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  8. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  9. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  10. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  11. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #2/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  12. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #2/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  13. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #1/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  14. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #1/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  15. PrivacyBadger = ABP code & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can PrivacyBadger do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on PrivacyBadger doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> PrivacyBadger does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    PrivacyBadger's Adblock+ codebase 128mb memory inefficiency http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay sees it by dumping addons used via native browser methods!

    +

    PrivacyBadger adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  16. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  17. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  18. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  19. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  20. PrivacyBadger = ABP code & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can PrivacyBadger do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on PrivacyBadger doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> PrivacyBadger does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    PrivacyBadger's Adblock+ codebase 128mb memory inefficiency http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay sees it by dumping addons used via native browser methods!

    +

    PrivacyBadger adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  21. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #2/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  22. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #2/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  23. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #1/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  24. Hosts eliminate tracking the best #1/3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on French Gov't Gives Facebook 3 Months To Stop Tracking Non-User Browsers

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  25. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Fast Returns To Google Play a Week After Being Pulled

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  26. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Fast Returns To Google Play a Week After Being Pulled

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  27. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on Adblock Fast Returns To Google Play a Week After Being Pulled

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  28. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on Adblock Fast Returns To Google Play a Week After Being Pulled

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  29. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Intel Says Chips To Become Slower But More Energy Efficient (thestack.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  30. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Intel Says Chips To Become Slower But More Energy Efficient (thestack.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  31. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  32. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  33. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  34. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  35. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  36. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  37. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  38. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  39. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  40. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  41. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  42. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  43. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  44. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  45. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  46. AdBlock+ = inferior & 'souled-out' vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C talk
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C talk
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C talk
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoning
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing (adblock & hardcoded favs)
    14.) Works on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) EZ data control
    16.) Block ads better vs. addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = on devices natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN operation (as 1st resolver).

    ---

    Ab+'s a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts use 3-11mb w/ my program initially). Even FireFox 41 adblock eats 65++mb http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it seeing addons via native browser methods!

    ---

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com... & ABP bought out adblock http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    ---

    Ab+ adds complexity in slower usermode (w/ more messagepassing overhead + context switch vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    & Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  47. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  48. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  49. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

  50. Ublock = inferior & inefficient vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Adblock Plus Maker Seeks Deal With Ad Industry Players (yahoo.com)

    Can ublock do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    * ANSWER ="NO" on UBlock doing 'em as well or @ all + hosts = on devices natively.

    * UBlock Origin NOW USES HOSTS - imitation = sincerest form of flattery - it's NO resolver & can't do DNS stuff in my list above hosts can!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do MORE w/ less vs. UBlock + Hosts start w/ IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver):

    Ublock's inefficient:

    Hosts @ 3mb-11mb w/ current data vs. threats + ads - test yourself.

    UBlock uses 63++ MB -> http://www.ghacks.net/2014/06/...

    Proof-> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    ---

    ClarityRay defeats it via native browser methods!

    ---

    UBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slow mode of operation (usermode = more messagepassing overhead vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    The best = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who verified its source is safe http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... ) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Installer -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...