Slashdot Mirror

But Diebold can be the butt of FUD-spreading without any sort of proof it ever contributed to actual vote-corruption — and without challenges from the same sticklers to the "unproven therefore false" approach...

I don't understand your point. Are these the same Diebold machines you're talking about?

When a process is demonstrated to be so flawed that compromise should be assumed, why is irrefutable proof even necessary?

Is your company's IT department aware that use of most HTTPS proxies will "reduce connection security and [...] introduce severe vulnerabilities"?[1]

[1] Zakir Durumeric, Zane Ma, Drew Springall, Richard Barnes, Nick Sullivan, Elie Bursztein, Michael Bailey, J. Alex Halderman, and Vern Paxson. "The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception". Proc. 24th Network and Distributed Systems Symposium (NDSS ’17), 2017-02. Accessed 2017-11-30.