Domain: l0b0.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to l0b0.net.
Comments · 11
-
Relevant links
Some relevant links - Horrible plug, but at least there are no ads.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:List your project
Alright, maybe this is useful to someone...
Shell scripts:
Other projects include an ISO mount/unmount script for Nautilus, XForms data entry and the LHC installation circular dashboard.
-
Re:What's the real difference
Here are two comparisons and a (shameless plug) novice user's perspective.
-
Re:HTML is dead, but no one noticed
Regarding time, there's really only two things that matter over old-style HTML: Validation and using semantics (unfortunately, @lang, <label>, and <abbr> are rare). Validating a change takes a few seconds, and doing semantics right depends a lot on the complexity of the data. At the same time, both of these really do prevent extra work down the road. Size depends far more on the developer than which markup language you use.
XHTML has the advantage of being both a good source and a good target for XSLT. You can e.g. generate your feeds from new pages automatically, and generate pages from your feeds. Store XHTML in the database, and you'll be able to depend on that data tomorrow and 15 years down the road. Also, newer versions of XHTML hint more towards semantics, but as always the quality will depend on whether the developer is willing to learn it properly.
-
Re:HTML is dead, but no one noticed
Shameless plug (but IMHO relevant): At my previous job I tried to convince the people in charge that using CSS and XHTML would be a smart move. The turning point was when I showed them that for three different cases, I was able to produce semantic and valid XHTML, plus valid CSS (without table layouts), while at the same time reducing code at least 53% and download size 60%. If that's not good enough to change...