Slashdot Mirror

Linda Lovelace is one of US pioneer pornstars

Who knows... maybe she's related to Ada. Remember, Ada is Lord Byron's daughter, and he had his fair share of scandals in his day.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Linda Lovelace is one of US pioneer pornstars

Who knows... maybe she's related to Ada. Remember, Ada is Lord Byron's daughter, and he had his fair share of scandals in his day.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

That would be DivX

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

One could argue that most of these viruses appeal to the base elements of the human psyche. For example, how likely are you to open an email with a topic like:
Re: My Photo by Cindi
Re: Hi Sweetheart by Melissa
Re: From you Secret Admirer by Linda Lovelace

etc.

Moderate this comment
Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Last Image

Here is the pocket multimedia player we have heard so much about recently. Sporting an 80 GB hard drive, this beauty can store and play all your pictures, music files and video files, (in Windows WMV format).

Nuff Said.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

A corporation may be legally registered and operating in dozens of countries

Exactly my point.

If one can be legally registered in dozens of countries, they should get a domain name on a per country basis. The only exception I see are the UN and similar organisations.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Is my favourite game of all time!

And then Civilisation, though it is not that classic. Prince of Persia is cool too.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Why are you and myownkidney spamming Slashdot with your lame website? What is your motive? And which one of you is:

Rezel, Rohana rezelrd@yahoo.co.uk
UNEP RRCAP AIT
PO BOX 4
KLONG LUANG, PATHUMTHANI 12120
Thailand
6625246492 Fax -- 6625162125

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

Well this war has been fought over before. Remember Adidas and the three stripes?

The only difference now is the Arena. In a time where branding is everything, the value of one's name, and its association with one's web presence is tremendous.

However, the current domain name registration system is haphazard to say the least. On the one hand you get the country specific top level domains, which applies to all the countries except US (Thought the .US does exist). There's .com and .org to differentiate between commercial and non-commercial organisations, but nobody takes that distinction seriously. .net (not the MS platfrom) is yet another completely different story.

I think the first task of the day is to get this anarchical hierarchy into some order. We must get US to use it's TLD, and get rid of .com, .org, .net etc completely.

Then, there should be clear guidelines as to who gets .com.?? and .net.?? etc. PEople have made these disticntions for tax purpose, why not do it for domain name purposes?

Then there should be a new second level domain, such as .ind.?? for individuals to register their names. It should follow the first name surname pattern. Of course mary.brown.ind.uk is going to be a problem, and a resolution scheme must be found.

The first-come first-server free for all messy domain registration system does not bode well for making the internet any less complicated.

Moderate this comment
Positive: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
Negative: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny