Slashdot Mirror

Cranston Snord writes: "A group of seven major players in the DVD market has come together to form the Video Watermarking Group, which will be submitting a spec to the DVD-Copy Control Association in July. More info is available from this article on Business2.0. With the recent SDMI Watermark crack saga, it's hard not to see the storm clouds looming..." This article has more information about how the waterworking would work.

An unnamed correspondent writes: " An article on PlanetIT.com discusses a court ruling that establishes the reverse-engineering of hardware and software as legal, under the "fair use" umbrella. What ramifications does this have in the industry? Can I reverse-engineer MS Word and write a word processor that can read and save .DOC files?" The article also asks the eternal burning question "Is the DMCA contradicting itself?" Though the court cases this piece deals with aren't new, the issues they deal with aren't going away, and it turns out that the Bleem and DeCSS cases may have more influence on other reverse engineering cases than anyone anticipated. Will sense chase out absurdity?

andyo writes: "Given all the discussion of technical anti-copying measures recently, it might be interesting to see the replacement technologies that the industry is working on after the DeCSS embarrassment. Watermarks (which came up in an earlier Slashdot discussion) and holograms are mentioned in this article on Planet IT."

A bankruptcy judge has refused to prohibit Toysmart.com's customer information from being sold as an asset against its debts. See the New York Times or the AP wire (CNET) version. Judge Kenner notes that objections may be raised later, and believes that in the absence of a buyer, any decision now would be premature. This case is key because, if the web's privacy policies are not guaranteed after a company goes belly-up, they're mostly toilet paper. But the lawyer for the now-bankrupt company argued that the privacy contract between TRUSTe and Toysmart, allegedly guaranteeing visitors' privacy, "like others in a bankruptcy proceeding, may have to be broken in order to realize the highest value for creditors in a sale."

That lawyer went on to say that the "adverse publicity" raised about the auctioning-off of your privacy made it hard to find a buyer for your personal information. A shame. "Now we're back where we started."

Why is he so worried about not finding a buyer? Because information about customers is valuable. Don't let corporations pretend otherwise. Selling who you are and what you buy can be a substantial source of revenue; as far as these companies are concerned, that's just one of their assets, like their cash in the bank or their real estate. Toysmart will continue to try to auction off those databases, probably after media attention dies down and it becomes easier to make the sale quietly.

And sadly, even if privacy prevails this time, it may not be important enough to set precedent, since the presence of childrens' information makes the Toysmart case "unique."

Update: 08/18 04:09 AM by J : For background info on the dot-com going-out-of-business process, check out this PlanetIT article. Note in particular that it can be hard for many dot-coms to find any tangible assets to sell, thus, customer data becomes more important.

Markar writes "Developers and programers decided to support EL/IX by Cygnus Solutions as the API for Real-time Linux. Only one dissenter was counted after the vote was taken. The lone dissenter wanted to wait for further developements. PlanetIT is carrying more information. " You can also check out more information about the conference as well.

theGEEK writes "Techweb has "Your Complete Guide to Linux Distributions" - it's a fairly large article aimed at corporate types for integrating Linux into the company. " Covers all the biggies and some of the minors more geared towards the suits.