Domain: project-w.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to project-w.com.
Comments · 6
-
Re:I've seen this before
It's scary to me to think that people who write code in the first style get to submit code to important projects like Apache. It looks like a Basic programmer writing in C syntax. Even for a string with no double slashes it is far less efficient than the second style.
Regarding the second function, it's unaesthetic (to me) to have the ++s twice, how about this:
no2slash.html
PS. "Lameness filter encountered. Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters." I suspect I wouldn't have got that message if the code were in VB instead of C :( -
Re:Wow!Maybe we could use it to describe you, this little, insecure, disrupted homophobe?
Most homophobes are closeted gays with very low self-esteem, and that is just how you look like, with or without your glasses
;) -
Re:Wow!Maybe we could use it to describe you, this little, insecure, disrupted homophobe?
Most homophobes are closeted gays with very low self-esteem, and that is just how you look like, with or without your glasses
;) -
Re:yes, unicode works, but is unnecessary.Anyone who's ever tried to write a page that needs to use multilingual fonts will know that Unicode is by far and away the easiest. I can load a Unicode-compatible text editor, type straight out the letters I want , and save, upload to webserver, and voila! Easy, compatible, and no pissing around with various coding conventions and garbage.
Here's an example which I did quickly: http://wolf.project-w.com/chess/pieces.html
-
Re:All Character sets simultaneously??You may want to write a comparative linguistic document, or perhaps write a manual that includes a glossary for various languages.
Here is an example of such a page:
http://wolf.project-w.com/chess/pieces.htmlOf course, to view this your browser will need to support Unicode encoding, and have the appropriate Unicode fonts.
I have also created a test page for various operating systems and browsers to view Unicode text: here.
My opinion on this debate? When loading this page, I didn't expect to see 75% of it being Americans saying, why doesn't everyone use English (!) A better solution, IMO, would be to pick a character encoding that can a) write all possible characters with a LOT of redundancy (who would ever need 2^31 IP addresses?), and b) not take up too much storage space for simple / common characters (I don't want to use 1K to write one sentence in a 4-byte charset).
Then, this encoding should be verified with all governments and, pending acceptance, made an ISO standard. -
Re:All Character sets simultaneously??You may want to write a comparative linguistic document, or perhaps write a manual that includes a glossary for various languages.
Here is an example of such a page:
http://wolf.project-w.com/chess/pieces.htmlOf course, to view this your browser will need to support Unicode encoding, and have the appropriate Unicode fonts.
I have also created a test page for various operating systems and browsers to view Unicode text: here.
My opinion on this debate? When loading this page, I didn't expect to see 75% of it being Americans saying, why doesn't everyone use English (!) A better solution, IMO, would be to pick a character encoding that can a) write all possible characters with a LOT of redundancy (who would ever need 2^31 IP addresses?), and b) not take up too much storage space for simple / common characters (I don't want to use 1K to write one sentence in a 4-byte charset).
Then, this encoding should be verified with all governments and, pending acceptance, made an ISO standard.