Domain: rfc-ignorant.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to rfc-ignorant.org.
Comments · 56
-
Re:Screw ICANN
rfc-ignorant.org?
The wonderful people who decided to list *.uk because the UK domain registrar doesn't give addresses in their whois output.
All because this violates the "spirit" of RFC954.
Note that it doesn't actually violate the RFC, just the "spirit" of the RFC. Useless feckers.
Although to be fair, I don't want to actually deal with any sites stupid enough to want to reject my mail because of this. -
Re:Screw ICANN
Say "Good Bye!" to your domain(s) then, skippy! I need to go and submit your domain to rfc-ignorant.org
-
Re:Now this gives me an idea...
There is something like this for whole sites / domains, not based on web-design, though. RFC-Ignorant.org gathers information about sites that don't have an "abuse" address or return mail sent to "postmaster".
Someone should start IE-Biased.org -
Re:IBM for rfc-ignorant.orgRFC 2142 requires every domain (with email) to have the abuse@domain.tld and postmaster@domain.tld addresses. IBM.com is a domain, so it is supposed to follow the rules in RFC 2142.
If they don't follow the RFC that's fine with me. However, I believe listing them at rfc-ignorant.org is a good thing so people who have chosen not to exchange email with domains who do not play by the rules have a chance to block IBM's mail automatically.
-
Re:It's anti-democratic ! There are other (better)
-
Re:Somethig most forget
I also forgot to take the bounces to the LARTs you sent to abuse@ and postmaster@ those domains and report them to
,rfc-ignorant.org. Abuse and postmaster accounts are required to be RFC-compliant. Reporting bounces to those addresses doesn't neccessarily benefit the anti-spam fight directly but it does help some administrators when they try to contact those non-RFC-compliant sites. FYI