Domain: secunia.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to secunia.com.
Comments · 2,642
-
Re:LEARN TO READ (you messed up)
An anonymous coward signing as APK wrote:
NO FIXES @ ALL ARE PRESENT HERE:
http://secunia.com/advisories/14295/
NOT A SINGLE ONE IS FIXED HERE (& there's 18 OF THEM!) & I'll even QUOTE secunia on that now:
"Secunia is currently not aware of an updated kernel version addressing the vulnerabilities."
You really are just sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "LA LA LA I can't hear you", aren't you? That notice is completely out of date. All of those issues are fixed. When they say that they are "currently not aware of an updated kernel version addressing the vulnerabilities", they're writing that nearly 6 years ago. They created the notice, then they abandoned it and didn't update it when fixes for the issue came about. I already listed the kernel versions where all of those were fixed, and I'll do it again:
Issues 4-18 from that page are fixed in kernel 2.6.11. Issue 3 is only for 2.4 kernels and is fixed in 2.4.32-rc1. Issue 2 is fixed in 2.6.11.2. Issue 1 is apparently fixed in 2.6.8.1.
You haven't disproven that at all. All you've done is repeated your tired old outdated, obsolete Secunia link over and over again without any rational analysis of it.
As for where you wrote:
PARTIAL FIXES ONLY PRESENT HERE:
http://secunia.com/advisories/44754/
Still has issues #'s 3,4,8 & 9 are STILL UNRESOLVED - you SCREWED UP LARGE!
You complete moron! Can't you even read, in the very notice you're linking to, that issues 3 and 4 on that list are resolved? It says "Vulnerabilities #2 through #5 and #10 are fixed in version 2.6.35.14". In case you weren't aware (although you should, because I've already told you more than once) "#2 through #5" parses as #2,3,4,5. That includes 3 and 4. Do you understand that? Do you have some sort of argument as to how it doesn't, or are you capable of admitting that you made a mistake? As for 8 and 9, I discussed how those could be worked around, but I did a little more digging and found out that it's unnecessary anyway. I downloaded the source for 2.6.39.4 and had a look at l2cap_core.c which includes a version of Dan Rosenberg's patch:
/* Reject if config buffer is too small. */
len = cmd_len - sizeof(*req);
if (l2cap_pi(sk)->conf_len + len > sizeof(l2cap_pi(sk)->conf_req)) {
l2cap_send_cmd(conn, cmd->ident, L2CAP_CONF_RSP,
l2cap_build_conf_rsp(sk, rsp,
L2CAP_CONF_REJECT, flags), rsp);
goto unlock;
}
nl802.11.c includes:
i = 0;
if (info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_SCAN_SSIDS]) {
nla_for_each_nested(attr, info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_SCAN_SSIDS], tmp) {
request->ssids[i].ssid_len = nla_len(attr);
if (request->ssids[i].ssid_len > IEEE80211_MAX_SSID_LEN) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;
} -
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
VISTA onwards runs GUI in Ring3/usermode
VISTA/Windows7/Server 2008 run their GUI in Ring3/RPL3/usermode... guess again!
This is EASILY provable too, by the end user: How? Install your vidcard drivers nowadays on those OS, you do NOT NEED A REBOOT (the DirectX driven AeroGlass display doesn't need it is why, pure usermode being why)
Heck - even with Windows "classic mode" (which I use over AEROGLASS here) doesn't NEED a reboot... even though it doesn't run the 2-3 services (themes & others) associated with AEROGLASS anymore... which IS more "proof thereof" to what I am saying here.
NOW, on security, Windows vs. Linux currently? OK (ALL penguins need to 'chew on this', & disprove my documented facts on my points below):
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34591/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 4 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Virtual PC 2007: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14315/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Visual Studio 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30853/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 2 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft DirectX 10.x:
(11/05/2011)http://secunia.com/advisories/product/16896/
Unpatched 0% (
-
Let's talk SECURITY (the topic & I'll kick ur
Disprove these recent documented facts on security (Linux vs. Windows) -
Hell - Yesterday, I even submitted the FACT that MS has issued a fix (temp until Patch Tuesday that WORKS) & it was rejected here 2x -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2510534&cid=37957572
(Merely illustrating that this site, & others like it, is full of FUD spreader "penguins"... Just as Ed Bott said the other day on "penguin bullshit" to put it bluntly, right @ the outset of his article here http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/leading-pc-makers-confirm-no-windows-8-plot-to-lock-out-linux/4185?tag=nl.e539)
I'll even requote his words there now:
"The campaign to spread FUD about Windows 8 is picking up momentum. In the past week, high-profile Linux advocates have tried to add fear, uncertainty, and doubt into what should be a smooth process for implementing a new next-generation security feature."
THEN, I'LL LET THE REST OF THESE FACTS ON SECURITY MOSTLY DO YOU IN, easily:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Bas
-
Let's talk SECURITY (the topic & I'll kick ur
Disprove these recent documented facts on security (Linux vs. Windows) -
Hell - Yesterday, I even submitted the FACT that MS has issued a fix (temp until Patch Tuesday that WORKS) & it was rejected here 2x -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2510534&cid=37957572
(Merely illustrating that this site, & others like it, is full of FUD spreader "penguins"... Just as Ed Bott said the other day on "penguin bullshit" to put it bluntly, right @ the outset of his article here http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/leading-pc-makers-confirm-no-windows-8-plot-to-lock-out-linux/4185?tag=nl.e539)
I'll even requote his words there now:
"The campaign to spread FUD about Windows 8 is picking up momentum. In the past week, high-profile Linux advocates have tried to add fear, uncertainty, and doubt into what should be a smooth process for implementing a new next-generation security feature."
THEN, I'LL LET THE REST OF THESE FACTS ON SECURITY MOSTLY DO YOU IN, easily:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Bas
-
Let's talk SECURITY (the topic & I'll kick ur
Disprove these recent documented facts on security (Linux vs. Windows) -
Hell - Yesterday, I even submitted the FACT that MS has issued a fix (temp until Patch Tuesday that WORKS) & it was rejected here 2x -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2510534&cid=37957572
(Merely illustrating that this site, & others like it, is full of FUD spreader "penguins"... Just as Ed Bott said the other day on "penguin bullshit" to put it bluntly, right @ the outset of his article here http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/leading-pc-makers-confirm-no-windows-8-plot-to-lock-out-linux/4185?tag=nl.e539)
I'll even requote his words there now:
"The campaign to spread FUD about Windows 8 is picking up momentum. In the past week, high-profile Linux advocates have tried to add fear, uncertainty, and doubt into what should be a smooth process for implementing a new next-generation security feature."
THEN, I'LL LET THE REST OF THESE FACTS ON SECURITY MOSTLY DO YOU IN, easily:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Bas
-
Let's talk SECURITY (the topic & I'll kick ur
Disprove these recent documented facts on security (Linux vs. Windows) -
Hell - Yesterday, I even submitted the FACT that MS has issued a fix (temp until Patch Tuesday that WORKS) & it was rejected here 2x -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2510534&cid=37957572
(Merely illustrating that this site, & others like it, is full of FUD spreader "penguins"... Just as Ed Bott said the other day on "penguin bullshit" to put it bluntly, right @ the outset of his article here http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/leading-pc-makers-confirm-no-windows-8-plot-to-lock-out-linux/4185?tag=nl.e539)
I'll even requote his words there now:
"The campaign to spread FUD about Windows 8 is picking up momentum. In the past week, high-profile Linux advocates have tried to add fear, uncertainty, and doubt into what should be a smooth process for implementing a new next-generation security feature."
THEN, I'LL LET THE REST OF THESE FACTS ON SECURITY MOSTLY DO YOU IN, easily:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Bas
-
Let's talk SECURITY (the topic & I'll kick ur
Disprove these recent documented facts on security (Linux vs. Windows) -
Hell - Yesterday, I even submitted the FACT that MS has issued a fix (temp until Patch Tuesday that WORKS) & it was rejected here 2x -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2510534&cid=37957572
(Merely illustrating that this site, & others like it, is full of FUD spreader "penguins"... Just as Ed Bott said the other day on "penguin bullshit" to put it bluntly, right @ the outset of his article here http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/leading-pc-makers-confirm-no-windows-8-plot-to-lock-out-linux/4185?tag=nl.e539)
I'll even requote his words there now:
"The campaign to spread FUD about Windows 8 is picking up momentum. In the past week, high-profile Linux advocates have tried to add fear, uncertainty, and doubt into what should be a smooth process for implementing a new next-generation security feature."
THEN, I'LL LET THE REST OF THESE FACTS ON SECURITY MOSTLY DO YOU IN, easily:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Bas
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
Time to KICK "OldSparky's" ASS more
Disprove these RECENTLY documented facts on security douchebag, ok? They're all (mostly) verifiable & from respected + reliable sources, especially regarding security:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Explorer 9.x: (11/05/2011)
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
MS = doing their job, but not LINUX (on security)
The temp fix, works, & MS is doing their job... is Linux? Well, let's see about that!
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerabili
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
FACTS vs. your "FUD" (that the "best you've got"?)
Illogical off topic adhominem attacks? Ok: Here's FACTS (on security) in response to THAT type of "Penguin FUD":
In fact? Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts! Ready? Read on:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/5244/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Sec
-
For speed most likely (chew on this)
Doing things @ ring 0 is usually done for speed, less message passing overheads (in fact, both Linux & Windows do their http.sys/http daemon that way, for example, nowadays @ least, but not in the past).
STILL?
Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap FUD, all to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts, regarding SECURITY!
Ready? Read on & WEEP, penguins:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
-
For speed most likely (chew on this)
Doing things @ ring 0 is usually done for speed, less message passing overheads (in fact, both Linux & Windows do their http.sys/http daemon that way, for example, nowadays @ least, but not in the past).
STILL?
Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap FUD, all to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts, regarding SECURITY!
Ready? Read on & WEEP, penguins:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
-
For speed most likely (chew on this)
Doing things @ ring 0 is usually done for speed, less message passing overheads (in fact, both Linux & Windows do their http.sys/http daemon that way, for example, nowadays @ least, but not in the past).
STILL?
Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap FUD, all to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts, regarding SECURITY!
Ready? Read on & WEEP, penguins:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)
-
For speed most likely (chew on this)
Doing things @ ring 0 is usually done for speed, less message passing overheads (in fact, both Linux & Windows do their http.sys/http daemon that way, for example, nowadays @ least, but not in the past).
STILL?
Time to BLOW your "forums 'Illogic-Logic'" spinmaster crap FUD, all to hell with MORE facts & actual logic + documented facts, regarding SECURITY!
Ready? Read on & WEEP, penguins:
---
1st - Linux also doesn't have as high quality drivers or as many because board makers KNOW what is "running the show/market " out there, Windows - so, they cater to it immensely!
2nd - Nor does Linux have as many games, by FAR, either (this is mostly the home market in fact!)
3rd - Not only that. but Linux, in its KERNEL ONLY mind you? Has 4x the unpatched security vulnerabilities Windows 7 has (which IS a complete "distro" with all of its parts, not just a kernel only)!
4th - Despite all those "Open 'SORES'" eyes (most of whom couldn't code to SAVE THEIR LIVES mind you) allegedly poring over Linux code, how come it has that many more unpatched bugs than Windows 7 has, hmmm??
Closed source is HARDER for hacker/crackers to attack as well, because you're stuck either disassembling it (especially tough with kernel level debuggers) OR fuzzing it, either is tougher than searching out problems in Linux, which you just load into a compiler & step trace its "Open 'SORES'" code with to find screwups in security... hence it still has more security bugs, AND, they are unpatched (despite all the "Open 'SORES'" eyes poring over it, lol!)
Fact, period!
5th - In fact, Linux's kernel ALONE has 4x the # of unpatched bugs the ENTIRE SUITE/ARRAY OF WHAT MICROSOFT GIVES YOU TO DO BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT WITH!
Proof? Ok:
This data's ALL from a respected source (secunia.com) for known security vulnerabilities unpatched:
---
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SQL Server 2008: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21744/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.x: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/17543/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 6 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28234/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/29809/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 3 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/34343/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 1 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 2.x: (11/05/2011):
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/6436/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Office 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/30529/?task=advisories
Unpatched 0% (0 of 9 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Project 2010: (11/05/2011)
http://secunia.com/advisories/product/31177/
Unpatched 0% (0 of 0 Secunia advisories)
Vulnerability Report: Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX 3.x: (11/05/2011)