Slashdot Mirror

somebody get Judge Judith Eiler's email address.

It does not seem, like she has one... We'll have to wait until she — and others like her — retire or die out and get replaced by the new generation of judges. Of course, the new generation will be quite ignorant of details of some other new tech. Such is life today — unlike for the previous part of civilization's history, technology can now change drastically within a human lifetime...

Then, again, this particular woman has already been cited for:

engaging in a pattern of rude, impatient and undignified treatment of self-represented litigants in the courtroom. This included inappropriately interrupting them, addressing them in an angry or condescending or demeaning tone of voice, and threatening to rule against them if they interrupted or annoyed her.

This suggests, our (self-represented) anti-spam crusader annoyed her and lost for that reason — not at all because she does not know, what spam is... I admire his intentions, but he needs to partner with a like-minded lawyer, who would be going to courts leaving Bennet to what he does best — baiting spammers and collecting evidence.

Hi, I don't live in Washington, don't have any particular interest in its laws, and had never been to its website before. What I mean is that, honestly, the info you're looking for isn't difficult to find.

First, go to http://www.state.wa.us/, then click on Locate state laws and rules (RCWs and WACs), then click on Revised Code of Washington by Title, then click on Title 29A - Elections, then click on 29A.64 Recounts.

And there you are.