Slashdot Mirror
Domain: texmacs.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to texmacs.org.
Stories · 3
-
GNU TeXmacs and Structured Text Editing
Joris van der Hoeven writes "It is a common belief that structured texts are best conceived using ASCII-based text editors like Emacs or VI. It is true that word processors like MS-Word have done a bad job on this issue. But does this mean that wysiwyg structured text editing would be impossible? We firmly believe the contrary and argue that such editors are both technically conceivable and desirable. Judge for yourself by taking a look at the GNU TeXmacs program, whose version 1.0 has just been released." -
GNU TeXmacs and Structured Text Editing
Joris van der Hoeven writes "It is a common belief that structured texts are best conceived using ASCII-based text editors like Emacs or VI. It is true that word processors like MS-Word have done a bad job on this issue. But does this mean that wysiwyg structured text editing would be impossible? We firmly believe the contrary and argue that such editors are both technically conceivable and desirable. Judge for yourself by taking a look at the GNU TeXmacs program, whose version 1.0 has just been released." -
GNU TeXmacs and Structured Text Editing
Joris van der Hoeven writes "It is a common belief that structured texts are best conceived using ASCII-based text editors like Emacs or VI. It is true that word processors like MS-Word have done a bad job on this issue. But does this mean that wysiwyg structured text editing would be impossible? We firmly believe the contrary and argue that such editors are both technically conceivable and desirable. Judge for yourself by taking a look at the GNU TeXmacs program, whose version 1.0 has just been released."