Slashdot Mirror

But are there any good submarine games for it? Tairan writes: "In an effort to sell off 2 million Dreamcasts before jumping out of the hardware business, Sega has lowered the prices of Dreamcasts to $99.00. If you don't already have one, better get down to your local gaming store now!"

Frankly, I'd really rather have an Aeron chair The tri-voweled reader nettdata writes: "Remember this old article that talked about a dot-commer including a Lego desk in his contract? Well, I think I've found the guy! Sun's Dot Com Builder page is doing a feature article on Blue Nile, and the picture in the article shows their CTO sitting at a Lego Desk.

Look here[1][, then look here[2] and tell me they aren't the same!"

Mr. Harshbarger's work continues to amaze, astound and befuddle. Where are all the Lincoln Log sculptures, and desks made of bright yellow Tonka truck metal?

Tell me again how sheep's bladders may be used to prevent earthquakes ... Geoffrey S. Zub of Vistaource passed on that company's Official Word on the Applix spinoff, which he says "can be attributed to Allison Antalek, Marketing Communications." It reads thus:

"In December 2000 the Company entered into discussions with several possible buyers and expects to consummate a divestiture or otherwise discontinue the business in the first quarter of 2001.

If you have consistently followed VistaSource through 2000, you will recall two key announcements:

• April 24th press release launching VistaSource as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Applix.
• October 19th press release announcing the engagement of FAC/Equities to explore strategic alternatives for VistaSource, including its possible divestiture.

VistaSource has been on a path to divest from Applix throughout the year 2000. In December, this culminated in discussions with possible buyers. The term 'discontinued operations' is a common legal and finance term used in these situations and should not raise concern about VistaSource's long term viability. Our Anyware offering is a leading technology from which we offer customizable, web-enabled, server centric, real-time solutions, and we will continue to focus our business to grow in this market segment. The exercises over the past twelve months have further focused our business on our key differentiators as we look to grow to prominence in 2001. We look forward to your continued support and to your business in the future.

Best Regards,
Allison Antalek
Marketing Communications
VistaSource, Inc."

Please don't throw another penguin on the barbie, 'K, mate? Last but not least, the indefatiguable Marc Merlin posted word of his newest wrap-up / conference report, with pictures, of the recent linux.conf.au 2001. Marc braved jetlag, the dangers of flying, and proximity to dangerous creatures like kangaroos and awful jellyfish to bring you these pictures and words, but he's dedicated. (Check out his license plate for proof.) As his report puts it, "If you noticed the absence of Showfloor pictures, it's simply because there was no Showfloor. This was a hacker's conference, not a tradeshow, and I'd say that it was just as well." Some great pix in here! Thanks, Marc.

Good question.

I wonder if it has something to do with the mentality of the players involved. I don't think Sun, Corel or Lotus ever thought that they might be able to get together so that they could compete on the Office market, I think they all looked to carve out pieces of the market with their own suites, making such collaboration impossible. Despite popular misperception, Applix does not convert DOC, it converts RTF (which may be close enough for some people). Star Office is striving toward this holy grail, but they aren't quite there yet. So maybe it's not too late for folks to pool resources and finally get the job done. In fact, with the eyes of the court on Microsoft, now might be the perfect time.

On the other hand, we have DWG, which is a fairly rich format that deals with the description of 3D objects. Could decoding a file format that deals with text and its presentation really be that much more difficult to reverse engineer? I'd guess this depends more on the design behind said file format. If one of the main goals of the .DOC format is obfuscation, this could be difficult indeed, but I wouldn't say that it's impossible ... not for three big corporations, nor for thousands of loosely organized coders. It's one thing to have control of a file format, but it's another to be put into the position of having to change the format constantly in order to stay in the game. If Microsoft is placed in this situation, the onus would be on them to either concede the format until the next major release is made, or shorten the upgrade cycle on Office. How many businesses would stick with an office suite which forced users to upgrade every eight weeks just to remain compatible? If something like this were to happen, we might finally be able to put a dent in the everpresent Office monopoly.

So why hasn't .DOC been reverse engineered? I would think that if this can happen to the DWG format then it can happen to any proprietary format. Have we tried, or has Microsoft's reputation, both professionally and legally, kept people from really thinking about it?