OpenBSD 2.7 Beta Out
vrkid writes: "Found this on OpenBSD Journal:
OpenBSD just moved up a notch in its minor number and is now at 7.
The first beta release of 2.7 is out. For people with strong stomachs,
a habit of banging the head against the wall and a love for testing
other's software: Download, install and send bug reports. "
Heh heh, you need to be a bit more specific. That's why Linux is popular with NEWBIES. True, there are a great deal less BSD users, but we have a lot less script kiddies, l337 wannabes, gamers, Windoze lusers, and other riffraff. BSD users want an awesome Unix system. Linux users are just attracted to the rebellious attitude and think that Linux will make them look smart.
I hope I've managed to offend a many people as possible with this post. Thank God that I won't be moderated down, since only fifteen people read this section, and none of us are moderators. Part of that is just statistics, and part of it is our negative karmas, earned by posting pro-BSD in other dicussions.
I guess in this life, I can only trust myself.
Myself and Willikins Bear, of course.
I have upgraded to 2.7-beta and I'm glad to see that ethernet bridging seems to be performing better.
Can anyone tell me what the story is behind the political divisions in the *BSD's? In particular, why do I keep hearing that Theo DeRaadt (the main guy(?) for OpenBSD) is ....um...interesting? Purely curious. If you can point me to a site, that'd be good to
-- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
Actually, I moderate ;) Thanks for the comments everyone. I would hold off on the poking at linux users. I did not know about the *BSD's when I started, and have spent so much time learning all I know about linux, I have not stepped over to that yet. One could say that *BSD users are just people who feel the the need to be rebellious for the sake of being rebellious, but I really don't think that is the case.
And I have never seen anyone get moderated down just because they like a BSD.
-- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
Does anyone know why it takes an OpenBSD machine 20 minutes to copy a disk image to floppy disk when other OSs take 2 or 3 minutes? I'm guessing that there's a valid reason related to caching or verification, but maybe the driver's just lousy.
I know, sort of offtopic, but you can see the tumbleweeds blowing through here (first post 17 hours after the original article?), and I'm curious.
Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
I agree with that, entirely. And its probably part of the reason that Linux is popular and *BSD is not.
As a side note, you mentioning IRC reminded me of the fact that #freebsd on efnet will kick/ban anyone asking a help question. (Use #freebsdhelp)
Definitely a bit too hostile on occasions.
*shrug* I'm still happy with my half dozen BSD boxen and still would rather work with OpenBSD than any other OS i've used so far.
Nothing's changed. Theo is as abrasive as they come in terms of developer communication. If you're the sensitive type, you better be damned sure that a bug you're reporting hasn't been mentioned or fixed at anytime, or Theo will be the first to remind you. Humorous? Yeah, if you take it that way. Good way to run a dev project? I don't think so, but it's no worse than the kernel threads of Linux. I've seen instances of "Yeah, I thought about that for about 10 seconds then realized how stupid it was. Of course we're not gonna put X in!" when submissions are made to OpenBSD.
The BSD crew as a whole, from my experience, are a more ornery bunch. They prefer mailing lists to IRC and want bug reports backed up with code checking, and preferrably a proposed fix. Linux guys, on the other hand, seem to be more "newbie" friendly.
Still, it hasn't changed my preference in OS. I run BSD.
The BeerBaorn