Slashdot Mirror


Shuttle Mission Under Way

TOTKChief writes "Normally, a Shuttle launch isn't all that interesting, right? Well, the STS-106 (ISS 2A.2b) mission was interesting because it used a very small launch window in order to save fuel, which is a good thing. SpaceRef has good coverage of STS-106 up and running, including some of the on-board science -- most notably a neat protein crystal growth experiment that was worked on by a good friend of mine. NASA needs to get cracking, though, because an ambitious launch schedule awaits."

11 comments

  1. why by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2

    don't they use a small "Launch linux" instead? Would prevent crashing entirely!

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:why by j_d · · Score: 1

      illiad, is that you?

    2. Re:why by Vrin+Drakus · · Score: 1

      Very wise AbbyNormal ;)

      ~ Vrin Drakus
      vrindrakus@home.com

  2. Houston, we have LIFT OFF!! by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Sucessful launch...YEAH BABY!! click here Nasa shuttle site

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  3. Number 99 by heliocentric · · Score: 1

    As I recall this was the 99th shuttle launch. Given the previous catastrophe this'd make it about a 1% chance of horror for a shuttle launch (not including weather statistics, etc...) so at what point does this factor into fuel savingins vs. lives?

    If you drove a car to work and back that had a history of blowing up 1% of use, that'd mean you were at risk of death once a year (52 weeks, trip to and from work...) would you take a root that saved on gas, or a safer root????

    --
    Wheeeee
    1. Re:Number 99 by TOTKChief · · Score: 1

      Considering that the predicted major failure rate was 2% from initial design, do you wonder why I cringe every time an STS launches? I just know it will blow up and my job goes kablooey with it. =) GFM
      --
      <><

  4. Huh? by AndyL · · Score: 1

    Why didn't this show up on the main page?

    Is there some special "Space Exploration" part of Slashdot that I'm missing?

    1. Re:Huh? by TOTKChief · · Score: 1

      You got me. I thought it was pretty cool. Cool enough to get posted, but not cool enough for main page. -shrug-
      --
      <><

    2. Re:Huh? by The+Musician · · Score: 1
      It was posted under the "Science" section.

      --

  5. First thing to be installed... by mduell · · Score: 2

    I was just listening to MSNBC on cable and they said that the first thing they would install on the ISS would be a toilet. Hrm...

    Mark Duell

    1. Re:First thing to be installed... by TOTKChief · · Score: 1
      I was just listening to MSNBC on cable and they said that the first thing they would install on the ISS would be a toilet. Hrm...

      Actually, it's likely that it's a short-term solution. To be flat-out honest, they haven't designed it all yet. There was a contract to be awarded called IVEST (IntraVehicular Equipment, Services, and Training, IIRC) that was to build toilets, showers, etc. I know that because our company was bidding on it and my best friend tried to suck me in to writing the proposal. =) But NASA came back last week and said, "We don't have the money right now, let's hold off." Not surprised -- this thing ain't going up in a fully-usable mode for two-three years.


      --
      <><