Slashdot Mirror
Bionic Ear Now In FDA trials
Kierthos writes: "This article mentions that a new bionic ear for people who are truly deaf has been developed. It doesn't amplify sounds, but converts them into electric impulses. And apparently, it's the software which is under review by the FDA, not the implanted chip." Silicon retinas, plastic hearts, synthetic skin, ceramic hips ... the line between possible and impossible keeps getting thinner.
Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology.
--
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
For example people with Alzheimers/brain damage getting auxiliary bionic brains - photographic + useful historical/temporal memory for instance...
:).
Then they can't look at certain stuff without infringing copyrights - because a high quality copy will be made automatically
Actually, it has more to do with the fact that deaf people have a culture all their own, and cochlear implants threaten to destroy that culture. Also, cochlear implants are far from perfect, and are at best a pale imitation. You can't really listen to music for instance, and hearing in crowded or noisy environments is next to impossible.
---
"No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
Scenario 1: The FDA quickly approves all drugs given to it by the benficial health companies who only want to do good.
or
Scenario 2: The FDA "drags its heels" and makes sure that all drugs that are approved not only cause no harm, but actually are beneficial.
Yes, in both cases, mistakes are made. However, there is a reason that the approval by the FDA is a coveted achievement.
Sure, we hear all the time, "they've had this drug in Europe for years." However, how often do we hear about the drugs they have that people use with absolutely no benefit whatsoever? Who exactly gave us reflexology?
I'll tell you the best of both worlds. Let the drug companies still get approval by the FDA, but allow them to market any drug that hasn't gotten approval. Then only allow suits against the doctors who prescribe these medications and kill their patients.
I demand a million helicopters and a DOLLAR!
is a shockingly arduous process. Remember, this is the same
fda that dragged its feet over beta-blockers -
this seems to
have resulted in tens of thousands of deaths.
People shouldn't get too worked up
over this invention. You may never
see it hit
the market.
--
--
Ikaruga scoreboard (supports netranking)
There's an Australian company, Cochlear that's had these things working for something like ten or fifteen years now...
They're up to their third generation models now.
From their site:
Cochlear has been the innovative leader in implant technology since 1982. 14% of our revenue goes toward research and development of new technology. Our commitment to pioneering new technology has led to many cochlear implant firsts that put us at the forefront of our industry.
We were the:
First to bring cochlear implants to market.
First cochlear system to gain worldwide approval for use by adults and children.
First to offer the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).
First with Neural Response Telemetry (NRT).
First to offer an ear level (BTE) speech processor to all Nucleus recipients.
-- kai
Give a man a mixtape, and he'll be grooving for an hour,
Specialist Mac support for creative pros, Melbourne
I have to disagree with the "deaf community". Being deaf is a defect. The vast majority of people on the planet can hear. Being without hearing or having poor hearing is a defect that can lead to all kinds of problems. (Trust me on this, I know people who suffer from occassional recurring hearing loss. It sucks big time when you go from hearing normally to not being able to hear anything for minutes or hours at a time. And the one deaf guy I know would love this thing.)
Now, personally, I'm waiting for full-colour, crisp picture cyber-eyes. But then, I suffer from deteriorating vision... (And hey, if they can throw in some of the cyber-eye mods from Shadowrun, so much the better...)
Kierthos
Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
Now, simply add a gigabyte of storage, audio recording software, playback options, and wireless network support and BAM your next P2P music sharing network.
http://www.gamedev.net/reference/articles/article
Additionally, they've found that people reading to themselves make "subvocalizations" - the muscles in your throat that control your voice fire, just not very strongly. Imagine if you could somehow translate those impulses into the words that you were subvocalizing, and transmit them via radio to these implants... It would almost be like telepathy.
Just imagine the fight to keep *that* traffic encrypted with keys outside the government's hands, and the price for advertizing space in your mind...
I thought it was interesting that the Discovery Channel chose not to explore any of these possibilities in their show, and instead focused on the (in my opinion strange) backlash within the deaf community against the assumption that these implants were good for deaf kids. They held that being deaf wasn't a "defect" that needed to be fixed.
Personally, I'd jump at the chance to extend my senses, either up to normal (glasses?) or beyond!
--
--
If we don't change direction soon, we'll end up where we're going.
....that everyone and their dog will be suing bionic ear owners for illegally decoding their product from sound waves into eletronic pulses. They will consider it another illegal, "perfect" digital copy.
*sigh*