Slashdot Mirror
Michigan Police Misuse Electronic Database
Pointing to this Detroit Free PRess article, Pat writes: "The lead paragraph says it all:' Police throughout Michigan, entrusted with the personal and confidential information in a state law enforcement database, have used it to stalk women, threaten motorists and settle scores.' Gotta love these databases." Considering a lot of people have access to ever-consolidating databases about your personal life, this is the sort of thing I plan to point to the next time I hear accusations of paranoia.
Bryant: Stop right where you are. You know the score pal. If you're not cop, you're little people.
And that was of course, a threat. Gaff, who's standing nearby, produces an origami chicken and sets it next to Deckard.
The real world is not quite so severe in most cases but the lesson is the reality of power and control.
By this I mean the story about the Michigan Police, but now that I have your attention, check out this apparently hidden story http://slashdot.org/articles/01/07/30/1558227.shtm l about how the DoD released something and then decided that it was classified and they're threating MIT and a professor there about it.
I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.
This is, IMO, not so much a technological problem as it is a police corruption issue.
And where does that corruption come from? It is, after all, power that corrupts. And the more absolute the power that we give law enforcement, the more absolutely certain we may be that they will be corrupt.
--G
Too bad this didn't make the cut for the front page. It's exactly this kind of shit that makes massive databases so problematic.
FYI, this was a two part series. Part two can be found here.
The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
I disagree ... give any group of people this power, and they would abuse it. I can't think of any group of people that doesn't have some bad eggs.
The reason I bring this up is because it is a case where there is a clear technical solution ... control the data, and let police officers know that their queries will be audited to make sure they are using the data properly.
Imagine if your workplace allowed anybody to view the payroll. Imagine the chaos that would ensue. This is what happens to the police (or anybody) when you give them uncontrolled access to anything like this.
Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone
Creating a database - as in the FBI's database on criminals - gives the owner leverage which can be used against those in the database. Linked databases create a more powerful database - which means more power. Combining the FBI's database with the IRS' database produces interesting results.
Privacy is increasingly an illusion. If people don't know what you're up to, it's because they don't want to take the time to find out.
What can be done to stop this trend? Probably nothing. Information will be increasingly available to more and more people. Recall the hacker ethic - "Information wants to be free." This has dangerous implications for your continued privacy. What if information really was free? What if everyone could know everything that you were up to? What if you had no privacy at all?
These are important issues for society to address. Should we expect better behavior from our police forces? Should we expect better behavior from the average citizen?
They say that people who live in glass houses ought not throw bricks. It seems like these days we're all living in glass houses. Only some of us don't yet realize it.
...in a USA which places cops squarely above the law in just about every respect?
Yes, these databases are pretty damn frightening, but they would be a whole lot less spooky if law enforcement officials were held to the rule of criminal law and tort law to which the "rabble" (read: rest of us) are bound.
The only highly public case which I can think of offhand of a police officer going to prison for misdeeds was the Abner Louima case, and this occurred mostly because the behavior in question had nothing to do with law enforcement, and the act itself was so egregiously subhuman that nothing could excuse it. Yet Louima is still alive.
The same cannot be said for Amadou Diallo. Or Patrick Dorismond. The undercover cops who were involved in these cases are, today... still weapon-carrying cops.
My sig is too lon
Film at eleven if the station is not hit by a power company mindfuck, er, uh, rolling blackout.
--
Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.
< If...it was public record of which officer accessed the information>
Would the police department voluntarily specify such a requirement?
I can see that the two possible answers to this question reduce to either "No" or "Hell NO!!! No Fscking WAY!!!"
You are right - This would require legislation to make such private database access publicly accessible. And given the track record of legislation as applied to anything in the least technical, it would likely be either ineffective or disastrous.
It looks like Scott McNealy was right
Ok, That's who it was. Thanks.
Liquor
Liquor
Sanity is a highly overrated commodity.
I can't remember which high muk-a-muk at Sun said it, but "You have no privacy. Get over it".
Well, privacy was nice while it lasted. These databases exist, and will continue to exist, and their use will continue regardless of legality.
On the other hand, maybe the problem is there's too much privacy - for the police using the database. If every plate they ran, or person they looked up, it was public record of which officer accessed the information, complete with a verifiable reason for making the enquiry, then the supervisors that just give quiet slaps on the wrist for misuse of the database could face some repercussions themselves.
Regardless of the method, it is a expectation that police officers should be held to a much higher standard of integrity than the average citizen. (This is also legal expectation in many jurisdictions, though the standard is not frequently met in any.) But how can they be held to any standard without some accountability?
Liquor
Liquor
Sanity is a highly overrated commodity.
Police are paid less then 30k a year, they are for the most part bullies and brutes. Can we really expect people of this caliber, paid little, to actually do things other than behave like themselves.
"you could infer what kind of guy the chick liked, and become that kind of person (at least when you're around her), as well as arrange to 'accidentally' bump into her."
No offense, but if you can't get a date through any other way, your genes weren't meant to be spread in the typical fashion...
IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
This information is just too powerful.
Former Memphis Police Chief Phillip Ludos said the practice is so common it is known simply as "Running a plate for a date."
That's really funny, kudos to the pigs for the neat hack. Using the system for a purpose it was not intended for, heck I wish I could just run the plates of some of the chicks I see here in L.A. - if you gathered enough information from enough sources, you could infer what kind of guy the chick liked, and become that kind of person (at least when you're around her), as well as arrange to "accidentally" bump into her. And I thought pulling people's docs was only used for evil.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!