Slashdot Mirror


Daemon News' September Issue Now Live

questionlp writes: "The September issue of Daemon News is now available on-line here. This month's issue has some very interesting articles, such as Loadable Kernel Modules in OpenBSD, the internals of jail, a review of the recently released FreeBSD book, 'FreeBSD an Open Source OS for your PC,' and more."

14 comments

  1. If this was anti-linux or slammed /. staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The BSD troll would have long ago been stopped.

    Instead, he keeps posting, and the /. staff lets it happen.

    1. Re:If this was anti-linux or slammed /. staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just an annoying bug. Don't bother with it.

    2. Re:If this was anti-linux or slammed /. staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That may be the way Microsoft and Linux works, but in BSD land, annoying bugs get fixed!

    3. Re:If this was anti-linux or slammed /. staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than one person does it, dumbass.

      Morons like you who reply make it funny.

  2. Way to go Daemon News by zentex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OB comment: I'm glad to see that with the lack of "hype" on BSD Daemon News is sticking to thier guns and pumping out the online newsletters and the dead-tree mags on a regular basis...

    BSD doesn't need the "hype" to sell itself (unlike the troubled linux variants). *BSD proves it's worth everyday....dont see Yahoo! running linux do ya? :-)

    Comment on them damn "*BSD is dying" posts:

    I know why these posts appear...Because the /. editors have thier heads so far up thier asses with "linux rules". I wouldn't be surprised if it was indeed CommanderPaco himself. Need Examples?

    Stories like "why doesn't the government use an Open Source voting system running on Linux?" (ran a few months back or so) Hell! I can tell you why, it's cause why re-invent the wheel and invest millions of dollars when you can *pay* someone with a commercial product the same amount and yet...not have to invest the time to get the job done. LINUX IS NOT THE ANSWER FOR EVERYTHING. Is that a hard concept to grasp? Everything, I mean EVERYTHING has it's place. MS has it's place, Apple has it's place, and UNIX (note, linux is *NOT* UNIX) has it's place.

    ...Back to my point...I have this theory that the ./ editors hard coded this damn "*BSD is dying" BS into slashcode to popup on every BSD story. Plus thier backers (VALinux) dig bashing anything that isn't thier product.

    I'm begining to wonder why in the *hell* i keep reading the crap that they call news. I know I sure as hell don't click thier banners. Why should I support lame-ass articles by 1/2 wit people, I'd rather watch 20/20 all day....

    yea yea i know, if i dont like it, dont read it. blah!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  3. exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You have it correct. If the *BSD is dying posts were GNU/Linux is collapsing! slashcode would be re-written to filter it. But, as long as the crapflood is anti BSD, they will let it stand.

    But, because it says *BSD is dying, it has been allowed to go on for 2 years.

    OSDN is not Open Source Developers Network, it is software for Linux developers network. It is too bad that people make the tie Open Source == Linux, and use Linux as shorthand for Open Source OS.

  4. Hit 'em with moderator points by bee · · Score: 2

    Do what I do to the *BSD is dying troll: every time I get moderator points, I go into BSD and moderate them down (-1, Troll). I generally end up spending anywhere from 2 to 4 modpoints that way every time. All it takes is a few of us that get moderator points and we'll have the problem taken care of.

    Of course, since I've now posted to this thread, I won't be able to mod down the troll in this article even once I get modpoints again. Ah well.

    --
    At least mafia-owned pizzarias make excellent pizza. Compare to Bill Gates.
    1. Re:Hit 'em with moderator points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we'll have the problem taken care of.

      If that was true, the problem would have been gone 2 years ago when it first showed up.

    2. Re:Hit 'em with moderator points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, you just prevent 2-4 worthwhile posts from being read.

      If I was a /. staffmember, I would ban you from moderation, since you obviously never read the moderation FAQ and have no clue.

    3. Re:Hit 'em with moderator points by bee · · Score: 1

      At least I'm posting as myself and not an Anonymous Coward.

      I don't have the time to go searching through score 0 posts looking for AC posts to mod up. Better to put modpoints to some use than just let them expire, IMHO. And if you think *BSD is dying trolls are worth being read, then your opinion on anything is so laughable as to not even be worthy of a reply. I shudder to think what would happen to slashdot if you were a staff member.

      --
      At least mafia-owned pizzarias make excellent pizza. Compare to Bill Gates.
  5. My copy of the new FreeBSD book arrived today by Laplace · · Score: 3, Informative

    My first impressions:

    * The CD is a freakin' CD-R!?
    * Instructions are great, and truly geared towards a FreeBSD novice
    * Lots of screen shots with deatiled instructions
    * Covers lots of topics

    This book is as good or better than any beginner Linux book I've seen.

    Still, it didn't give me any indication on how to set up my PCI modem (no, it is not a win-modem!). Damn my uninformed purchase! (the modem, not the book)

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
    1. Re:My copy of the new FreeBSD book arrived today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the CD is a CD-R.

      Parts of the book market is million copy runs (Harry Potter as an example). Alas, a FreeBSD book is not a million seller. Given a limited run on a book about a ever changing target, it would be best to make the CD as needed, rather than a bunch of books that have, oh, say. FreeBSD 3.5 included.

  6. Why the new Slashdot Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, many of you have probably noticed a lot of ascii art flooding this board lately. You're no doubt wondering why CmdrTaco's much encountered "lameness filters" are ineffective against it. To answer that question, I'm going to take you on a Perl journey, deep into slashcode. Think of it as being a bit like "Heart of Darkness", or if you're a typical slashdot pleb, "Apocalypse Now!"

    The first files we'll be looking at are the infamous "bitchslap" and "modslap". I think these are a pretty decent introduction to how Rob's mind works when he's coding angry: Here's bitchslap . Scroll down to the section labelled "main program logic". BTW. "main program logic" is a ridiculously grandiloquent phrase for what we are seeing here.

    Note how draconian this is. I like to think of this code as a memorial to slashdot-terminal, it's first victim. You can see how Malda deliberately broke his "self-regulating" moderation system, to give the admins of slashdot dictatorial powers. This code allows any admin using it to drop a user's default threshold to -1 instantly, and drop his karma down to a level from which it is unlikely to recover. I've heard that this script has been used on slashdot in a modified form, with the -defaultpoints set to less than -1, completely eliminating a user's post from normal viewing, unless people edit their query string manually.

    On to modslap ]. Scroll down to "main program logic" again.

    OK, what you're seeing here is Taco's method of restricting the flow of crack to moderators, to keep them nice and jumpy. If you don't mod the way he likes, you're moderating days are over, and your karma plummets to bitchslap levels. An ugly tool.

    To recap, the man we are dealing with here is obviously an anti-democratic tyrant. Censorship is his weapon, and he is vigilantly watching his censors, to ensure that no freedom is allowed to enter his domain. I believe he also lives in a hut with a man driven crazy by his proximity. The hut is surrounded by skulls on poles, but the skulls face inward. Remember that.

    We're nearing the locus of my investigation now. You've heard the legends, now gaze into the face of comments.pl's so-called "troll detection code!"

    comments.pl : Scroll down to the section under "here begins the troll detection code".

    You may be wondering why it's such an ungodly piece of crap. I feel that we are seeing evidence of an ingrained unwillingness to think before coding.

    The first few tests are fairly simple, based on regexps and length. They're pretty laughable, from an information theory perspective. If you don't believe me, the parent of this post should supply adequate evidence of what I'm talking about. Language is a complex thing, and a few simple tests are insufficient to distinguish English from ascii art, especially when the ascii artists are willing to take extreme measures to see their work posted. Regular posters do not have the patience for such chicanery.

    The final test is my favourite, though. It begins under the comment ending with this charming sentence: "These ratios are _very_ conservative a comment has to be absolute shit to trip this off". An interesting claim. Considering the number of posts I've tripped this filter on, without doing anything out of the ordinary, I'd say "conservative" means the same thing to Taco as it means to George W. Bush, nb. "nazi". What we are talking about here, is the postercomment compression test. (The horror! The horror!) "postercomment" is just the name of the field your comments are sent in, by the way. It isn't cool top secret slashspeak. It's just a variable name.

    What this does is, it actually compresses you're comment using zlib, then checks the change in size to decide if you are a troll or not! Furthermore, the code comments indicate that if you trip this test, slashcode thinks you are a "luser". Code like this makes it pretty clear that it takes one to know one, Rob!

    As someone who as actually seen Rob Malda use the phrase "it won't scale" to dismiss questions about why parts of the moderation system weren't done in a more equitable fshion, I'd like to take this opportunity to laugh until I give myself a hernia.

    Anyone who has studied information theory knows that the redundancy of english is estimated at about 50%. This value is fairly key in what we are seeing here, it determines a fair estimate of how effective compression of english text can be before we start to lose information. Taco's estimates were based, in his words, on "...testing out several paragraphs of text...". Doesn't sound like a particularly large sample group. What's more, it's indicative of poor software engineering practice. As is the recent bout of outages.

    A few final criticisms. Firstly, there are far better, less memory intensive, and above all, less stupid methods of performing textual analysis than checking it's compression ratio. If Taco had any idea about computer science, he might have investigated a few before making a fool of himself in public like this. It's pretty clear that he's getting more and more frustrated with the situation on slashdot, and doesn't realise that if he ruled with an even hand, rather than a bitchslapping script and an army of trained thought police, the problems would not be so grave.

    Secondly, I thought of a much more effective method of eliminating asci art posts, and it will never cause problems for genuine posters. What's more, it's extremely compact and doesn't even require regexps. I won't reveal it here, as I am not willing to assist in a reign of terror that I find to be reprehensible.

    As further evidence of the lengths Malda and Co. may be willing to go to, you can find a commented out section that enables the deletion of posts and their descendant threads. We have no reason to believe that this will not be employed on slashdot.

    Editorial notes: I don't use Perl and this is really the first time I've examined it closely. It's pretty much convinced me that I'm not missing much. I use real languages such as C and C++ and occasionaly asm to do most of my work, and I, along with 95% of the enterprise world, find Java to be the best solution for web programming. For most scripting tasks, shell script suffices. For more complicated scripting tasks, Python provides a more sensibly designed scripting environment. Additionally, as if to provide further evidence of Malda's incompetence as a programmer, I've hit the junk character post every single time I've previewed this comment, and am now forced to resort to edit it. Regretfully, I have been forced to replace the Perl fragments I was using with hyperlinks. Very unsatisfactory.