Slashdot Mirror


Lost Moon-Landing Tape Recovered, Restored

esome writes: "Video clips of American astronauts bouncing around on the moon will never get old as far as I'm concerned. Now we've got one more to drool over thanks to Kipp Teague who has worked hard to archive Apollo stuff on his site. The BBC has an article on it here."

90 comments

  1. 30 years on.. by onion2k · · Score: 2

    Ok, conspiracy theories ahoy, but with modern cinematic techniques faking a film like this would be *really* easy. But I can believe it.

    Apart from the bullet-time 360 of Neil Armstrong jumping over Agent Smith.

    1. Re:30 years on.. by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      except it is audio

  2. More MLP! by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

    Here's another link to an apollo archive. Lost of stuff here; video, audio, stills, radio transcripts, technical stuff...

  3. Audio, not Video by 4im · · Score: 3, Informative

    Where in BBC's article did you read anything
    about video? This is an audio recording, *not*
    video!

  4. The question on everyone's mind.... by EGSonikku · · Score: 1

    Will it show the US Flag flapping in the wind on the 'lunar' surface, or Armstrong's " Good Luck Mr Gorsky" comment ;)

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    1. Re:The question on everyone's mind.... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      >The question on everyone's mind....

      ...who assume it is video because they didn't read the artice explaining it is *audio* of the controllers during the landing.

  5. Movies don't by Supa+Mentat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    do this stuff any justice. After having just listened to the recording all I can say is WOW! That was history right there, we've seen Houston do the "GO" thing so many times in movies, but man when you hear it for real it just gets you going like a movie can't. About the first 33 seconds are silence with a little static but after that the chatter is pretty constant. Another thing the movies leave out is the fact that nearly all of those guys had moderate to heavy southern accents. ;)

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    1. Re:Movies don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another thing the movies leave out is the fact that nearly all of those guys had moderate to havy southern accents.
      True. It should be remembered the successful era of our space program ws the result of White technology. We had a racially pure workforce. We weren't hampered by political correctness and the need to fill racial quotas with unqualified Negroes and other substandard minority groups. Our greatest success stands as an everlasting tribute to the White European peoples. It wasn't pointy headed semitic leftist Harvard pinkos who put us on the moon -- quite the contrary; it was the brilliant redneck good ole boys and former Third Reichers who were the crowning glory of space exploration.
  6. The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    1. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I knew it! There HAD to be something wrong with the whole "moon" idea. I mean "man in the moon" - what kind of bullshit is THAT?

      I actually believe there are several "moon" satellites orbiting the earth, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see it in Europe, when it is hovering over the US. Damn liberals. Not only do they spy on their own people, but also on us europeans, who have done nothing against them.

      I'll bet that the stars are surveillance satellites as well - I mean, they're always at the same place at night, night after night, year after year. Damn liberals!

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by spagma · · Score: 1

      Hey... You forgot to mention how the earth is flat, and that the Earth is the center of the universe. Maybe saving that for another day huh?

      --
      If it won't boot, Fsck it!
    3. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      You know, I keep seeing this exact same post crop up, and get modded up, every time an article related to the Moon is posted. Is this the definition of "karma whoring"?

      Main points where the joke could be improved: remove, or at least improve, the denial of pre-1950 Moon mentionings (I can think of quite a few pre-1950 references to the Moon, which therefore strains the credulity of that bit), and address the issue of what happens when both Sun and Moon are both set (early pre-dawn, usually) or when the Moon is emitting no light (thus defeating its ostensible illumination purpose).

    4. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by swanky · · Score: 1

      Funny how you consider a movie like "Enemy of the State" factual documentary.

    5. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up.

      Nice troll, but I have one suggestion. Anyone that would speak of "decent, God-fearing Americans" would probably not use the metric system. They would use the English units like miles, as God intended.

    6. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by slimeypete2 · · Score: 1

      They would use the English units like miles, as God intended. English units? Not anymore. Bloody government are trying to force metric on everyone. Who honestly feels comfortable with measuring their height in metres and their weight in kilos? Sheesh.

    7. Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth by A+coward+on+a+mouse · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that the metric system will not take off in the USA until one of two things happen:

      1. The average height of the American male reaches 6 ft. 4 in. (~1.92 meters).

      2. The meter is changed to be equivalent to 2 ft. 9 in. (~890 centimeters).

      Otherwise, those of us who are a bit over average in height will lose the important component of our self-esteem brought by being able to claim 6 feet of distance between the soles of our feet and the tops of our heads. I'm not joking; "1.82 meter-er" just doesn't have much of a ring to it. Until this issue is resolved, expect the US of A to stick with the English system, at least for the measuring of human height.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  7. Now if only the astronauts by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny

    had been attractive women with big breasts, watching the bounce around on the moon would have been ALOT more interesting.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:Now if only the astronauts by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      Yet another good reason to go back to the moon.

    2. Re:Now if only the astronauts by archen · · Score: 1

      had been attractive women with big breasts...

      If they had done that, the lunar landings would have been pay per view...
      and damn right I would pay!

  8. umm... by mithrandir14 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They just got old! A winner is YOU!

    --
    fsck -t goldfish /dev/CmdrTaco;
  9. uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently whoever posted this didnt even check it out. This aint video. It's just a bunch of them on audio tape talking about banging broads.

  10. Great Recordings by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This audio is just amazing...in a week filled with despair and sadness, it's a welcome break to hear something so optimistic and uplifting. It reminds me of this record set I had when I was in college, called "I can hear it now". It was a 3 or 4 LP set of important events that happened in the 60s, narrated by Walter Cronkite. It had the "We choose to go to the moon" speech, the assassination of JFK, MLK, lots of stuff from Vietnam...but the thing that I played over and over again were the recordings from the Apollo missions. Something about that *beep* and the courage in their voices...the sense that I get, just from listening to them talk, was that every one of those men knew they were doing something incredible. I'm really glad this story got posted.

    1. Re:Great Recordings by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 1


      Check out that recent movie called "The Dish", about the radio dish in Australia. I watched it last weekend, it restored some of my faith in humanity :) Ordinary people contributing to the Apollo missions, with lots of video+audio clips, of course.

  11. Just One Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the Moon really made out of cheese?

  12. Looking for the pure video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I am looking now for a long time for a high quality video of the first moon landing WITHOUT any music, comments etc.
    I just downloaded this rm audio copy from the link above. Now I want the pictures to this, too.
    Has someone a link or can recommend a video to buy?
    Again, there are lots of them out there, but none of the ones I found is uncut and uncommented. Many have background music. But I want the pure stuff!

    Thanks!

  13. The *real* tapes by int18h · · Score: 1

    The *real* tapes are here. Open your eyes to the NASA conspiracy!

    --
    -- tree, n: lump of wood with green things
  14. Listen to a piece of history (the rescued tape). by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case people overlook the audio link on BBC's link (top right), you can listen to the rescued tape (direct link to RealPlayer. To me, it sounds very good! The first few minutes is blank/static, but the fun part begins after that. The whole audio is about 10:51.3 minutes. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  15. Re:one small wank for a man... by cyberdonny · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... but a helluva blowjob for Mr Gorsky.

  16. conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    conspiracy theorists need to be shot. take it to neal borts, not slashdot...

  17. A Real Live Conspiracy Page!! by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    The least you could do is Feed The Machinie!

    --
    - Dan I.
  18. Heres cool. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

    The collection of MPEGs they have very nicely fit on one 3" CD. :-)

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  19. Re:shut up! by onion2k · · Score: 2

    Riight.. ok. Just because you can't prove its a hoax you should assume its real eh? So, by this, you presumably believe that David Copperfield can fly, David Blaine can levitate, and that Paul Daniels has chopped Debbie McGee into several small pieces. After all, going be experience (that of having seen such stunts) I must surely to believe that they're real.

    Bollocks.

    Develop a healthy sense of paranoia. People will try to rip you off. They will try to make you believe the unbelievable. And in your case, they'll succeed it seems. Assuming someone is telling the truth is a hideously niave and downright crazy attitude. Going by your own experience works. I haven't been to the moon. Whats easier to believe, that someone faked it in a movie studio, or that a huge team of people worked for years to propel a very heavy object all the way to our major satellitte, take a few photos, and then come back again.

    My post was a joke. So, you humourless idiot, sod off.

  20. Available in Normal Formats? by ewhac · · Score: 2

    I don't allow proprietary codecs on my machine. Is there a version of this audio clip in a standard format, like AIFF or MP3?

    Schwab

    1. Re:Available in Normal Formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is there a version of this audio clip in a standard format, like AIFF or MP3?

      That's UNpossible! Moon landing was way before MP3 or AIFF, dumbshit.

    2. Re:Available in Normal Formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Real was available in 1969?

      Another conspiracy!

      Anonymous Coward
      (Who watched the moon landing in streaming Quicktime in '69)

    3. Re:Available in Normal Formats? by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      I don't allow proprietary codecs on my machine. Is there a version of this audio clip in a standard format, like AIFF or MP3?

      Schwab

      Hey... my name is Schwab...

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
  21. Video and Audio by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Apollo archive has lots of MPEG video clips as well.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  22. Good luck, Mr. Gorsky by petej · · Score: 1

    Is this the tape where Armstrong says "Good luck, Mr. Gorsky"?

  23. Re:Accents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that's specifically a Chuck Yeager accent, not generic Southron. Seems that even the Ohioest of astronauts went into 'aw, shucks' mode as soon as they were behind the controls: the accents are positively nonexistent in interviews! :-)

  24. How can anyone with half a brain believe this stuf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone with half a brain who takes 5 minutes to look at the lack of a blast crater, the dodgy re-edited clips, the misplaced cross hairs on the phots etc will realise the whole thing was faked...

    ...what was that? Almost no one here has half a brain????

    Oh well, that's alright then.

  25. video tape by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    I can recall some years ago, like on the 20th anniversary or something, there was a late night broadcast of the entire first moon moon landing, however many hours long it was.

    It was was something like 6 hours long.

    I wonder if it is available anyplace.

    (There was also one a similar brodcast about pioneer going past neptune. That one I think I taped, and have it buried someplace)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:video tape by rampant+poodle · · Score: 1

      Don't know if it's commercially available but it does exist.Bayern 3, (German TV channel), showed what appeared to be the whole thing on the anniversary of the lunar landing this past July. Really amazing looking at the technology of the period. The wall sized display of the spacecraft's position appeared to be driven by x and y axis wires, (think of a BIG plotter). I was around for the original. Watching it from today's perspective was even more facinating.

  26. A document crying out for SMIL by Boiotos · · Score: 2, Informative
    Very exciting stuff: one of the flight engineers shouts 'GO!' with such palpable joy. Thirty years later and I'm still one of the guys "turning blue."

    This document could be all the more interesting and useful if it were marked up with SMIL. Using this, we could synchronize the display of a transcript, including the names of all the speakers. Last fall at the Virginia Center for Digital History I saw a demo of a similar treatment of some audio surrounding Kennedy's administration and the Cuban Missile Crisis.

  27. Re:How can anyone with half a brain believe this s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, those of us with a complete brain recognise idiotic conspiracy theories when we see them, and we can shred those theories to bits, point by point, with facts:

    http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo/moon_hoax_FAQ. html
    http://www.business.uab.edu/cache/debunking.htm

    For example.

  28. Re:shut up! by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    As I understand it, it would be much harder to fake a moon landing to the accuracy alledgedly achieved than to actually land on the moon.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  29. You can just see it by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    It is amazing to hear them read out the altitude numbers in feet. The building next door to me is 54 storeys tall, so when the lander gets within 500 feet, I can just see it coming down past that building's roof. Then, when it got within 120 feet, I looked out my 14th-floor window and realized they were closer to the moon than I am to the earth!

    Also, keep in mind that they didn't know whether the machinery would work, or whether the lander would sink into the moon dust, or what have you. They were literally descending into the unknown.

    Quite an amazing piece of tape.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:You can just see it by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      >they didn't know whether the machinery would work, or whether the lander would sink into the moon dust

      This is the part of the story that really captures my interest, the "T1" decision. They really had no idea what to expect on the surface of the moon and had a leave/stay decision to make in the seconds following the landing.

      Problem was, all the controllers were so overjoyed that the lem had made it down to the surface (after Armstrong had gotten down to _seconds_ of decent fuel), that Kranz had trouble getting them to sit back down at their consoles so they could decide if they were going to take off again right away or stay on the surface.

      I haven't tried to download the audio while here at work, I'm going to do that as soon as I get home tonight. Should be interesting to listen to that moment for real (after having seen it portrayed in "Earth to the Moon" and whatnot).

  30. Re:Urgent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YUO=FAGGOT

  31. Wow, EVA units were so bulky back then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo! Bulk Mail Folder Activation Notice


    Dear NeilArmstrong@yahoo.com:

    You have just received an email message in your new Bulk Mail Folder!

    Yahoo! has created this folder as part of our continuing efforts to fight unsolicited commercial email, commonly known as spam. Using Spamguard&#153, an innovative technology recently developed at Yahoo!, we are now able to automatically detect spam and direct it to your bulk mail folder. The Yahoo! Mail team believes this will significantly reduce the intrusion of unwanted commercial email into your inbox.

    While we will make our best efforts to deliver solicited commercial and non-commercial email directly to your inbox, we may occasionally send a message that you have requested to your bulk mail folder. For this reason, it is important that you check this folder periodically to make sure that you do not miss these messages. If you believe that a message that has been delivered to your bulk mail folder is more appropriately delivered to your inbox, please click on the "Send to Yahoo! for review" link on the message and it will be automatically forwarded to Yahoo! Customer Care for a careful review. Furthermore, if there is a particular message in your bulk mail folder that you want to ensure is delivered to your inbox, you can set up a filter to do that. More information on filters can be found at filters help.

    Messages will remain in your bulk mail folder for a minimum of 30 days, unless you delete them yourself. After 30 days, the messages will be subject to automatic removal. You may wish to empty (delete the contents of) your bulk mail folder yourself on a periodic basis as these messages will count towards your mail quota until deleted.

    To access the bulk mail folder, click on "Folders" in the blue navigation bar on the left of your Yahoo! Mail screen and then click on "Bulk Mail" in the mail screen. To empty the folder, click "check all" at the bottom of the folder and then "delete" checked messages. You can also click on "folders" in the left-hand navigation bar and then on "empty" next to bulk mail.

    If you do not want Yahoo! to send messages to your bulk mail folder anymore, you may opt-out of this service. In order to opt-out, go to Mail Preferences and click on "Inbox" under "Bulk Mail Delivery." Don't forget to "save" your preferences before you leave the page.

    Please note that Yahoo! provides the Bulk Mail Filtering and Deletion System (Spamguard&#153) as a service to our users. If users do not want to use the service, they may opt-out. Yahoo! makes no warranties and disclaims any liability in connection with your use of or inability to use this service. For more information, please review our Terms of Service.

    As always, abuse of the Yahoo! Mail system by sending unsolicited commercial email and certain types of unsolicited non-commercial email (for example, chain letters) is a violation of the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
    Sincerely,

    The Yahoo! Mail Team

  32. Re:One small step for man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send all moderators to the moon without spacesuits. 'offtopic' ?

  33. Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the whole thing was just a hoax.

  34. FOX by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Has anybody run this past the experts at FOX? They pointed out that the moon landing was a fake, so they should be able to make short work of this. After all, they have an investigative reporter and a camera maker to provide them with incontrovertible opinions.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:FOX by FIGJAM · · Score: 1

      http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

      Learn to stop being be so damn gullible.

      --
      Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
    2. Re:FOX by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Seeing as how we are unfamiliar with sarcasm, I will close the cash register at this point.
      --Comic Book Guy

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  35. The tape started to disintegrate? by K8Fan · · Score: 2

    Haven't these audio experts at Nasa heard about baking the tapes? That's standard procedure for any audio or video tapes of that vintage. You put it in a scientific oven (one that maintains a constant temperature, rahter than cycling on and off) at 130 degrees for 4 to 5 hours. That bakes out the liquid and emulsifies the binder. I've been restoring old 1/2" black & white videotapes. They were unplayable without baking and clogged the heads after 30 seconds. After, I was able to play fairly long sections.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  36. Re:The *real* tapes - CHECK THIS OUT - FUNNY!! by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Things like this should not be viewed at work.

    The potential for fellow staff to question your sanity as you giggle to yourself or the possible damage to company computers when projectile blast your coffee/coke is too great.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  37. Re:shut up! by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    No one tries to expose stage-magicians as 'fraudulent' because, by the very nature of their profession, it's understood to be an illusion and appreciated to the degree that what we nonetheless know to be illusion appears to be real. The result of watching a good magician is delight and amazement for exactly that reason. If we thought it was real, we'd respond with fear or paranoia. As for the moon landings, the 'exposes' I've read are pretty ridiculous, but that's neither here nor there, as your post was clearly (to me) meant in jest.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  38. GOATCX ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've been warned!

  39. Re:How can anyone with half a brain believe this s by FIGJAM · · Score: 1

    If there's one thing that shits me it's ignorant people who defiantly believe in a conspiracy theory just because it differs from what is commonly told. Learn to question everything you see/hear, not just one side of the story.

    --
    Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
  40. Why didn't he just ask Paramount by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    for the original film? Or they planning on releasing it on DVD? Or perhaps making a remake of the moon landing starring The Rock and Kevin Bacon?

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  41. Re:shut up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry for the delay, I'll try to fix it.Click Here

  42. Re:shut up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've fixed the delay...Here are the rest of the files. I will post some more later.

    Part 1

    Part 2

  43. Tapes in Texas? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    You mean the tapes are just rotting away in Texas? Shouldn't one of the greatest recordings in history be preserved in the National Archives?

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  44. Re:The moon -- Literature pre 1950 by Technician · · Score: 2

    Find any of your grandparents old bibles that was published before 1950 or any old sea story literature regarding nighttime navigation..

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  45. OT: definition of karma whoring by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing this exact same post crop up, and get modded up, every time an article related to the Moon is posted. Is this the definition of "karma whoring"?

    Since it was posted by an AC by definition it can't be karma whoring since that term implies the poster is getting remuneration in the form of karma. Since AC's receive no karma from their post there is no way for them to receive such remuneration.

    Furthermore, karma whoring in general became essentially pointless on slashdot when the 50 point cap was put in place. Once you get enough points to earn an automatic +1 Bonus, there is really no point to posting purely for the sake of karma, or skewing your posts with the intention of getting additional karma, the hallmarks of a true karma whore.