Slashdot Mirror
Pluto-Kuiper Express A Go (Again ... For Now ...)
Guppy06 writes: "According to this article at CNN, Congress has approved $30 million for the bastard stepchild that is the Pluto-Kuiper Express probe. Originally slated for a 2004 launch, it's now pushed back to 2006, the last possible date to launch while Jupiter is in the right place and Pluto's atmosphere is still an atomsphere. After being snubbed by NASA and then by the Bush administration (and in light of the recent budgeting complaints), it remains to be seen if NASA will actually go ahead with it."
Hasn't this mission been on and off for years? It seems worthwhile, if only to get close-ups of Pluto.
Thanks,
Travis
forkspoon@hotmail.com
Isn't this exactly the same story as this one posted two days ago? That story was both about this Pluto mission and the development of the Mars program, but a lot of the issues with Pluto have already been discussed.
Ceci n'est pas une sig
"Bastard stepchild..." The PKE was much too expensive. But, then, it was JPL's project, so no one was shocked at that. NASA was wise to have farmed it out for competing bids from other groups. And, in fact, the other groups are able to do at least as much (probably more) for less than JPL could. So calling it a 'bastard stepchild' seems unnecessarily derisive to me.
The 2006 launch date is not critical. One of the two competing team leaders has worked out that with Venus gravity assists, we could send a probe to Pluto in any given year. Furthermore, in reviewing the recent papers on the topic, he's determined that it is quite unlikely that the atmosphere will freeze out as was predicted a decade or two ago.
Finally, NASA wants this mission. The Bush administration does not, but congress does. And remember who controls the money: congress.
Interesting experiment: post a reasonable-souding article with a troll subject line, and see what the moderators do.
The only trouble is that your post is content-free, so this is an unmitigated troll. However, I don't feel like wasting my mod points on it.
Have a nice day.
Patrick Doyle
I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
Posted by timothy on Saturday November 10, @10:31AM
from the tentative-steps dept.
Guppy06 writes: "According to this article at CNN, Congress has approved $30 million for the bastard stepchild that is the Pluto-Kuiper Express probe. Originally slated for a 2004 launch, it's now pushed back to 2006, the last possible date to launch while Jupiter is in the right place and Pluto's atmosphere is still an atomsphere. After being snubbed by NASA and then by the Bush administration (and in light of the recent budgeting complaints), it remains to be seen if NASA will actually go ahead with it."
< Covalent's Version of Apache 2.0 To Drop Monday | Flat-Rate Wireless Where The Sun Don't Shine (Much) >
Big_Ass_Spork (446856)[ Preferences ]
Related Links
this article
budgeting complaints
More on Space
Also by timothy
Science
World Solar Challenge Set To Begin
Major Meteor Shower Next Weekend
Wind Tunnel for Birds
Pluto-Kuiper Express A Go (Again ... For Now ...)
IceCube Neutrino Telescope
Pointing the Way for Micro Motion
Neutrinos, Muons and the Standard Model
Satellite Observing Black Holes
USNA "Budget" Satellite Launched and Functioning
NuTeV result disagrees with Standard Model
Pluto-Kuiper Express A Go (Again ... For Now ...) | Preferences | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion Threshold: -1: 4 comments 0: 3 comments 1: 2 comments 2: 2 comments 3: 0 comments 4: 0 comments 5: 0 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads) Save: The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. Ass Penetration. (Score:-1, Troll)
by forkspoon on Saturday November 10, @11:27AM (#2548413)
(User #116573 Info) Hasn't this mission been on and off for years? It seems worthwhile, if only to get close-ups of Pluto.
Thanks,
Travis
forkspoon@hotmail.com
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
- Cool (Score:0, Offtopic)
Posted two days ago (Score:2, Informative)by p3d0 on Saturday November 10, @12:37PM (#2548539)
(User #42270 Info | http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~doylep) Interesting experiment: post a reasonable-souding article with a troll subject line, and see what the moderators do.
The only trouble is that your post is content-free, so this is an unmitigated troll. However, I don't feel like wasting my mod points on it.
Have a nice day.
--
Patrick Doyle [ Reply to This | Parent ]
by Man of E on Saturday November 10, @12:07PM (#2548465)
(User #531031 Info | http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday November 11, @01:22PM) Isn't this exactly the same story as this one [slashdot.org] posted two days ago? That story was both about this Pluto mission and the development of the Mars program, but a lot of the issues with Pluto have already been discussed.
[ Reply to This | Parent ] A Few Points (Score:2, Interesting)
by CheshireCatCO (weissj@nospam.colorado.edu) on Saturday November 10, @12:07PM (#2548466)
(User #185193 Info | http://bogart.colorado.edu/~weissj/cyrano.html) "Bastard stepchild..." The PKE was much too expensive. But, then, it was JPL's project, so no one was shocked at that. NASA was wise to have farmed it out for competing bids from other groups. And, in fact, the other groups are able to do at least as much (probably more) for less than JPL could. So calling it a 'bastard stepchild' seems unnecessarily derisive to me.
The 2006 launch date is not critical. One of the two competing team leaders has worked out that with Venus gravity assists, we could send a probe to Pluto in any given year. Furthermore, in reviewing the recent papers on the topic, he's determined that it is quite unlikely that the atmosphere will freeze out as was predicted a decade or two ago.
Proof of the gay-linux conspiracy!