Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Zealands's Mysterious Sponge-like Creature

Posted by timothy on from the feral-sponge dept.

Kryptonomic writes: "New Zealand's marine experts are puzzled by the parasitic sponge-like animal that could threaten NZ's aquaculture industry. Apparently the animal, which so far has not been identified, kills all other sealife by embedding itself on the victim and slowly feeding on it. The parasite also reproduces asexually and could end up dominating the ecological niche it occupies."

52 comments

  1. There is a mysterious sponge-like creature... by electricmonk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...in my pants!

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
  2. New Zealand by jquirke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I hate to do this, but the country is New Zealand not New Zealands - I definitely know this - I spend 18 months of my life there.

    This might look like Flamebait/Troll, but much worse would happen if we misspelled "Americca" :-)

    1. Re:New Zealand by PD · · Score: 0

      Aren't there two islands? Why not call them the New Zealands then? Is that so wrong? Or how about New Zealand and Newer Zealand?

      --
      If tits were wings it'd be flying around.
    2. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spend 18 months of my life there.

      ..what?!

    3. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to do this, but the country is New Zealand not New Zealands - I definitely know this - I spend 18 months of my life there.

      Definitely a troll! And a classic one at that.

      First of all, nowhere in the post or in the article is the country of New Zealand referred to as "New Zealands" as the poster, jquirke, implies. It is spelled a few times as "New Zeleand's" Note the apostrophe denoting a possesive use of the country name, and the possesive case is used properly in both the post and the article.

      Second, the poster, jquirke, injects his own grammatical error -- "I spend 18 months of my life there." Either he is currently in New Zealand, and the correct grammer should be "I am spending 18 months of my life there." Or he has lived in New Zealand in the past, and the correct grammer is then "I spent 18 months in New Zealand."

      Finally, jquirke states that, although resembling both a troll and flamebait, his post is simply what any red-blooded American would do if our country's name was misspelled.

      In conclusion, what we have here is a carefully crafted troll from someone who apparently has spent 18 months in a country whose primary language is English but who has failed to learn basic English grammer and spelling.

      Cheers!

    4. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title said New Zealands's.

    5. Re:New Zealand by jquirke · · Score: 1

      Obviously, then, you don't have a title bar.

      Did you search for every instance of the word "New Zealand" in the article just to label me a troll? Well you still missed the most obvious one of all.

      And yeah, the grammatical error was more of a typo as I spent about 10 seconds making that post.

    6. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you have to spend at least 20 seconds before you post it... slashdot makes you... so don't lie...

    7. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think americans (Ammericcans, Ameirikans, Amarecins... whatever) would be that anal about a simple typo... I wouldn't...

    8. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its The North Island and The South Island

      Don't forget the The

    9. Re:New Zealand by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Funny
      Its The North Island and The South Island

      You forgot The West Island, aka Australia.

    10. Re:New Zealand by Agronomous+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      -.... OR apart from the heading saying New Zealands's's's's's's its possible that the poster believes in reincarnation and merely forgot to finish the sentence... "I spend 18 months in NZ each life and they STILL can't say 'Fish and Chips'" OR maybe "I SPEND 18 months a year in NZ.."

    11. Re:New Zealand by Agronomous+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      Argh the hideous sponge like creatures are coming to Australia now too. Oh no its OK its just NZ doleys.
      "I'd like to buy a fusher and pikelet wushing muchine thunks"

  3. The only way out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Call the mysterious sponge-like creature "zea". Then obviously, "zealand" is the land of zeas. It should be clear in retrospect that it is a stupid place for human settlements.

    1. Re:The only way out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, Zealand is as a matter of fact the name of the danish island that houses Copenhagen... I'm not as sure as you are, that it's a stupid place for human settlements ;)

  4. Feral sponge??? by PD · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that some kind of sponge that escaped from a kitchen sink somewhere and reverted to a life in the wild? The mind boggles...

    --
    If tits were wings it'd be flying around.
  5. Doesn't actually "feed" on victim by swmccracken · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that it filters out and "eats" plankton. However, it doesn't directly attack more solid sealife, it simply spreads over everything and smothers it. It doesn't seem to "inject" into (say) mussels or whatever's around to assimilate nutrients from it. (read the nz herald article)

    Yeah, it seems bad for NZ sealife at the moment - man-of-war jellyfish have made their recent first appearance and a while ago there was a mysterious mussel parasite. So, it's not the first time that something wierd's turned up in the water. There was also an alge bloom a year or two back, which I don't think was ever totally explained.

  6. *A* sponge? by metallidrone · · Score: 1

    It's not just any sponge--it's SpongeBob SquarePants!

    [*ducks*]

    1. Re:*A* sponge? by jwit · · Score: 1
      From the article:
      It has been temporarily dubbed Didemnum sp.? until it can be properly identified.

      It so new people don't even know how to spell the sponge's name!
    2. Re:*A* sponge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpongeBob would not act like this, I watch him all the time. He's my hero!

  7. I think it's name is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Bill Gates

  8. Great Sci-Fi Novel by finity · · Score: 1

    This would make the topic for a great scifi novel. Just imagine:
    A new form of killer sponge infects the beautiful waters of New Zealand, killing humans and sealife alike.
    Ok, so maybe that's not the best use of the topic, but you see my point...

  9. Sounds like my old roommate. by Electronic_castaway · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It's either

    Neil Bush Silverado

    Roger Clinton The Roger Clinton Experience (Real Media)

    Billy Carter (Billy Beer)

  10. Four islands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    North Island: roughly 2.5 million people. South Island: rougly 1 million people. Stewart Island: several hundred people. The Chatam Islands: several hundred people.

    It's named after Zealand, and the most likely other name would be Aotearoa. -- Matthew - Wellington, NZ.

    1. Re:Four islands by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      Every island -- several million sheep. *

      And let's not forget about Waiheke Island, Great Barrier Island, the Three Sisters, etc., etc. Some of them are even populated. By people.

      * (Okay, maybe not on Stewart or the Chathams, but it sounds better that way.)

  11. Well, you learn something every day. by Darwin_Frog · · Score: 5, Funny
    Embeds itself on the victim and then slowly feeds on it?

    I didn't know sponges even went to law school.

    1. Re:Well, you learn something every day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And they say time travel hasn't been invented yet.

      This post is clearly from the 80s...

      You see, white people drive this way

      Do be do do ba wa do

      Whereas black people drive this way...

      Uh uh yeah uh uh uh uh yeah!

      It's funny because it's true! We're so lame!

    2. Re:Well, you learn something every day. by gnovos · · Score: 2

      Embeds itself on the victim and then slowly feeds on it?

      Ah ha! I was wondering where my ex-girlfriend had moved to... and now I know: New Zealand.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  12. Public reactions: by tunah · · Score: 3, Funny
    Microsoft's Steve Ballmer has announced that these sponges have taken hold due NZ being filled with "GPL apologists and anti-IP maniacs".

    RMS has announced on the gnu.org site that the evils of software patents and proprietary software has kept us too busy reinventing the wheel to destroy evil sponges.

    Linus Torvalds posted on comp.os.linux.sponges:
    I couldn't care less what this evil sponge is doing. I'm just working to make my sponge the evillest it can be.

    George Bush has announced the US would be 'declaring war' on sponges. This follows similar moves on drugs, civil liberties and reckless use of frisbees.

    The unidentified evil sponge was not available for comment.

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  13. Fungus by Perdo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the fungus that was growing on the OUTSIDE of mir when it hit the ocean in that region. Imagine the mutation rate of a fungus in a hard radiation enviroment. Fast enough mutation to become an extremephile living on the outside of MIR. Extreme enough to survive reentery? Shure...

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Fungus by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Good fungus link

      If this is not it... I'm sure it will show up eventually.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  14. New Toursim Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, throw another parasitic sponge creature on
    the barbie, and enjoy New Zealand!

  15. myarweioua vampire sponge... by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    SO wouldnt YOU be wearing glves, unlike the guy in the picture?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:myarweioua vampire sponge... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      reminds of a documentry I saw on Australia, where they guy was holding some small ultra-poisonious octupus like creature, with gloves, then puts it back into the tide pool, right next to his bare feet.
      Man, I would of loved for it to bite him. Not that want him to die, but it would have been damn funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. tough call by azephrahel · · Score: 1

    This is actually a rather tough call for them. NZ has been pretty good, especially by today's weak standards, to protecting its enviornments and wildlife. The question is, what are they going to do? Try to anihilate the sponges to save their harbor's indigenous species and farms? That in itself might violate some of their statues. I'm not sure. On one hand I think its awful, and dangerous beyond any way we can measure, to start killing off a species because we think its a pest.

    --
    You are only young once, but you can stay immature indefinitely.
    1. Re:tough call by Jailbrekr · · Score: 2

      Did you even read the article?

      It is not an indigenous species. Much like the rabbits and foxes and dogs of Australia, this sponge is not native to the NZ waters. There is no tough call here. You eradicate so as to preserve the ecological balance in the harbour.

      --
      Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    2. Re:tough call by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1
      Or perhaps "like the rabbits and foxes and dogs of New Zealand" really. Well, perhaps not foxes and dogs, but rabbits, opossums, and feral cats are a big issue here already.

      There are other precedents (ragwort, for example) which we manage to keep in check. I don't imagine it'll be a huge problem, just one more long-term nusance we could've lived without!

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    3. Re:tough call by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      I don't imagine it'll be a huge problem, just one more long-term nusance we could've lived without!

      Just like deer used to be.

      Yep, they were considered a huge pest a few decades ago. Now it's not at all difficult to find a 6 metre fence to keep the damn things inside.

    4. Re:tough call by SEE · · Score: 2
      Life isn't indigenous anywhere. An "indigenous" form is merely one that reached the landmass before humans did. All of natural history shows a pattern of "non-indigenous" species invading other islands and continents. For example, the fauna exchanges and mass extinctions of South American marsupials as a result of an ice age recession of sea levels linking South America to North America.

      When you hear someone advocating the extermination of an "invader" to protect "indigenous species" and a local "ecological balance", you are hearing someone who is either ignorant (often willfully) of ecology, or believes that humans can manage the ecosystem better than nature can.

      Which are you?

    5. Re:tough call by danox · · Score: 1

      Not sure if I agree with you, especialy in regard to human-introduced species. but I think in the case of this article, your point is moot. they don't want to get rid of the sponge to save the ecology so much as they want to pretect their seafood industry. I am sure if there were indigenous sea creatures that were threatening their oyster farms they would be thinking of killing them off as well.

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
  17. sponge=M$ by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    sounds just like Microsoft!

    -they connect to the host
    -they suck its life blood out
    -then they keep growing looking for more prey

    --



    I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    1. Re:sponge=M$ by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      whoever mod'd this as Troll should have their modding privileges taken away. it may not have been funny, but Troll? please. especially since somebody else referred to Steve Balmer and wasn't modded as Troll.

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
  18. obSeinfeld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is not sponge-worthy.

  19. reproduces asexually by jawahar · · Score: 1

    ... this attribute of the creature is dangerous to ecology

    --
    Slashdot = Sarcasm
    1. Re:reproduces asexually by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, black and green fly, various bacteria and other asexually reproducing organisms have been around far longer than mankind has.

      There's pro's and cons to asexual reproduction. On the one hand, you reproduce more quickly (some black fly are even born pregnant!), on the other a disease can swing through and get all of your sibblings because you are genetic clones.

      All known organisms except bacteria do both asexual and sexual reproduction. There seems to be limits to how many generations purely asexual reproduction can occur before the damage kills. Not quite sure how bacteria deal with this, but probably their genome is shorter and they have extensive genetic repair mechanisms and possibly use some DNA swapping, plus they reproduce really fast...

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:reproduces asexually by Actinophrys · · Score: 1
      All known organisms except bacteria do both asexual and sexual reproduction.

      Not true. Most of the lower protozoa (things like Euglena) don't have sexual reproduction, and some animals and plants have secondarily lost it, like certain rotifers. Plus, even among organisms which do have sexual reproduction, many can reproduce asexually indefinitely.

    3. Re:reproduces asexually by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      >Not true. Most of the lower protozoa (things like Euglena) don't have sexual reproduction, and some
      >animals and plants have secondarily lost it, like certain rotifers.

      Not sure which animals have lost this; but protozoa and rotifers.

      >Plus, even among organisms which do have sexual reproduction, many can reproduce asexually indefinitely.

      There is some question over this apparently. How many generations do you allow the asexual reproduction to run before declaring that they can do so indefinitely? 30? 100? 1000? Why that number?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:reproduces asexually by trongey · · Score: 1

      All known organisms except bacteria do both asexual and sexual reproduction.

      Huh? When was the last time a human (or other vertebrate) reproduced asexually? I realize that a lot of /. readers try, but it never works.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  20. No sponge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is no sponge. It is a tunicate, a distant relative to humans (sponges are far more distant).

    Some relatives can be seen at:
    http://www.biology.ucsc.edu/classes/bio161/KFE%2 0i nvert%20photos/D_carnulentum.html

  21. Lovecraft was right afterall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First we have "Mystery Squids" (Star Spawn of Cthulhu?), and now this! Does it remind anybody else of a Shoggoth?