Speak Up For An Open German Parliament
ofels writes: "In the discussion of replacing the outdated Windows NT machines in the german Bundestag with open source based software, the german social democratic party (SPD), currently in charge of government, has opened up an online discussion channel for opinions on working with open source and Linux.
Make sure you walk by and make your voice heard."
Ok, I'm not really serious on this one ...
From: Felix von Leitner
:-)
they say they switched to a qmail on
Linux that handled all the load they had coming at them with ease, and
they are pretty happy with it and think the government should prefer
open source over commercial software for the adminitration.
From: "Marc Hoffmann"
Message was signed by unknown key ID E90CD6EE
wird die Bundesregierung u.a.
aufgefordert, Open - Source- Software zu fördern und alle
.
Als Webserver wurde zunächst der NCSA- Webserver genutzt, der später
gegen Apache ausgetauscht wurde.
The firewall in use is running under linux. their old ncsa webserver
has been changed and now the apache is running.
einzusetzen. , eingesetzt.
ldap is used as the central email adressbook the software is also
open source, openLDAP.
sorry for my really bad translation but i tried my best
There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
Very interesting reading, unfortunately my German is too rusty to transalate some of the better discussions in reasonalble time... One thing I must say though - the level of Linux advocacy is much higher than I have seen on English speaking forums... It is mostly the MS-apologists who quickly run out of arguments and start mindless bickering...
It's an open system. There are some thing that I do not believe should be run on an open system. The government is one. The military is another.
A closed system such as MS Windows/Windows NT means that only one company has the potential to put spyware into your computer tracking everything you do at OS level from the time the package is installed.
An open system such as Linux, while infinately less expensive, more reliable when properly configured, isn't secure at the source level. What's to stop Linus, Alan Cox, RMS, or whoever else has a hand in Kernel development to stick in a few mines of undocumented code that log and e-mail input? Hypothetically.
If Linux was a beer, it'd be shipped in open barrels for everyone to have a chance to piss in before it was drunk. Not that everyone *Would* piss in it, but if you were serving that beer to say, the President, wouldn't you rather know that the beer was not contaminated and pay more for it, then take the chance with the free beer?
Linux has it's place - but I, personally, do not believe that that place is in government or the military. Maybe busineses. Corporate espionage is sort of interesting.
NT and its facsimiles will always beat linux in the user market. Reason being? Linus and friends
get bored when the word "user" is mentioned...Gates and friends see dollar signs when the word "user" is mentioned.
Which camp actually bothers to check and see if people can use thier software? Take a guess.