Slashdot Mirror


Net Translations of Dead-Tree IT Classics

slander writes "I have in my shelves a secondhand, bent-folded-stapled-and-mutilated copy of "Numerical Recipies". Thinking I could do better, I googled a little to find Numerical Recipies in the Universal Library. A very neat nerdy resource indeed. Slashdot's attention was drawn by a re-release of MathWorld in Nov 2001. What other dead-tree classics are hiding out there?"

7 comments

  1. Classics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I'm not sure what you mean by "classics". Is MathWorld a "classic"? I don't mean that pejoratively -- I tend to think of a "classic" as something old and dusty, and MathWorld has only been around for 6 years or so.

    If you're just looking for online books, there are lots of them; e.g., here and here and here. Of course, almost all books for which the copyright has expired are online somewhere -- although very few, if any, IT books would fall into that category.

  2. Yet another valuable resource . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    . . . that can be pulled at any time at the whim of a publisher. I recommend wget -m soon.

    ~~~

  3. Don't blindly trust NR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most experts in the field of numerical analysis have a low opinion of Numerical Recipies. Check out this page.

    1. Re:Don't blindly trust NR by joto · · Score: 2
      Most experts in any other field of programming also have a low opinion of Numerical Recipes. It's quite obvious upon reading it that the authors doesn't exactly value good coding style, good explanations of the algorithms involved, commenting their code, or even using descriptive variable names.

      The book is completely unusable for learning numerical analysis, and it's unusable as a recipe source, as the code is copyrighted. Coupled with the fact that actual numerical analysts doesn't like it either, the popularity of the book is quite astonishing... (anyone have any idea why?)