Slashdot Mirror


Controlling tha Noise?

Quite a few submitters have asked "How do you make a quiet PC". Well, rather than tackle it from the PC standpoint, how about devices that can quiet a whole environment? Along these lines, 16977 asks: "I've been considering building an active noise control system for an area about the size of a closet. ANC today doesn't work quite as well as it did in Silence, Please (works best for low frequencies, only covers small areas, etc.), but it is still a fascinating technology. I'm wondering if anyone out there has done similar projects with either the hardware or controlling software of ANC, and what information they have to share." And since I have your attention on this subject, sammy.lost-angel.com asks: "I would like to ask the slashdot community about their recommendations for noise-cancelling headphones. Traveling in planes is very noisy, and with MP3 players becoming more and more common, I would like to hear some experiences with various different noise cancelling headphones paired up with MP3 players. How well do they work in general? What is the best and most cost-effective headphones available?"

60 comments

  1. One thing I have had some success with by base3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Use some foam (the kind used in upholstery works nice) around the edges of fans where they meet the case. You'd be surprised how much of that fan noise is actually due to the vibrations being transmitted to the steel itself.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    1. Re:One thing I have had some success with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you wanted frist p0st so bad you didn't even read the write up. fscking moron. Anyway, pr0ps for the first post.

    2. Re:One thing I have had some success with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I, the One and Only Anonymous Coward, wish to apologize for my past behavior. My obsession with poor spelling and achieving the not-so-coveted "first post" was childish and immature, and will cease forthwith.

      It is my heartfelt hope that those in the Slashdot community can find it in their hearts to forgive me for my puerile antics, and eventually come to accept me as an active contributor to this vibrant online forum. I look forward to working with you all.

      Yours Truly,
      The Anonymous Coward

  2. I don't understand by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Could you clarify whether you are trying to make the inside of the "closet" quiet, or trying to prevent noise
    from escaping the closet. They are two very different problems. The solution for preventing noise from
    escaping the closet is so straight forward that I can't imagine why you'd need to ask here. ( look into
    recording booth construction ). Why you would want to solve the second problem makes no sense at all.

    1. Re:I don't understand by erlenic · · Score: 1

      The problem with not being able to prevent noise from escaping is answered in your post: look into recording booth construction . Some people are not able to make serious modifications like that, if, for instance they live in an apartment / college or military dorm, etc. Placing a noice cancellation device in the closet is the best answer for that situation.

    2. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obvious that he means inside the closet: he doesn't want the others to hear him shitting and farting.

  3. Cost Effective Noise-Canceling Headphones (DIY) by Mr.Mustard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Headwise has a DIY noise-canceling headphone project. That's probably the most cost effective way to get a pair.

    --
    fnord
    1. Re:Cost Effective Noise-Canceling Headphones (DIY) by Crazyscot · · Score: 1

      I followed the HeadWize project, but couldn't quite get the phase cancellation right; it was good to burn my fingers on the soldering iron again :-)

      I tried Brookstone's NC headphones, found them to be OK but not very comfortable; I eventually splashed the $300 on the Bose QuietComfort and haven't looked back. They are fantastic, thoroughly recommended.

  4. Worse and worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Controlling tha Noise

    Did you mean 'the'?

    A three letter word in the title is spelt incorrectly ... if so-called editors let this past then there is no hope left for them.

    (EOE!)

    1. Re:Worse and worse by Streuner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Kid, if you ever went out into the scary dark place that is the real world, you would have noticed there are about a gazillion songs that are called "foo tha noize", therefore, this is probably a joke. So are you, by the way.

      --
      I have no karma and I must post.
    2. Re:Worse and worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a Herb!

    3. Re:Worse and worse by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

      Notice what department this article is from. Now google for "Public Enemy" and see what one of their biggest tracks is.

      I think that it was a really stretched attempt at humor, much like Emily Dickinson's poetry is a stretch at rhyming. It works, but it's kind of like hammering nails with a 9.1 Seagate Elite.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  5. Noise cancelling headphones. by oregon · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my experience, they do provide a noticable drop in background noise on a plane. But I didn't find it enough.

    Quiet-ish noise is better than loud noise - but don't spend $80 (I think that's what I spent) expecting silence.

    --

    ---
    Oregon
    1. Re:Noise cancelling headphones. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > In my experience, they do provide a noticable drop in background noise on a plane. But I didn't find it enough.

      And you've brought a box full of homebrewed electronic components onto an airplane after 9/11?

      What did the security drones say? (Seriously -- I've got homebuilt computer/audio gear and test equipment that I'd like to bring with me while traveling, but am worried about ever seeing it again because some jerkwad getting $5.00/hour thinks it's a bomb or weapon. Or worse, after I demonstrate it to him, said jerkwad says "Cool, I always wanted a pair of noise-cancelling Sennheisers!" and confiscates 'em anyways.)

  6. Noise cancelling headsets... by nneul · · Score: 5, Informative

    Granted, this is a bit out of the price range most people are willing to pay, and are overkill if you just want headphones, but the Lightspeed 25K ANR aviation headset is fantastic.

    I tried it once in my cubicle (inside a large IBM mainframe style machine room with a couple of rackfulls of machines and 4 large air conditioners) and it almost completely silenced the ambient noise.

    Keep in mind, these headsets are around 20-28dD passive, plus another 23-30 dB active noice cancellation, but they are designed around the frequencies put out by 4 cylinder piston airplane engines at around 2400 RPM.

    I believe Bose X headsets are similar. I don't know if their non-aviation headsets are anywhere near as good those.

    BTW, The 25K's typically go for around $450-$500.

    1. Re:Noise cancelling headsets... by Snowfox · · Score: 3, Informative
      Granted, this is a bit out of the price range most people are willing to pay, and are overkill if you just want headphones, but the Lightspeed 25K ANR aviation headset is fantastic.

      I tried it once in my cubicle (inside a large IBM mainframe style machine room with a couple of rackfulls of machines and 4 large air conditioners) and it almost completely silenced the ambient noise.

      BTW, The 25K's typically go for around $450-$500.

      Sony makes a low-end version of these which are enough to cancel out air conditioning and case noises, and which have a standard headphone jack so you can plug in and listen to PC music while working.

      You should be able to find them at Best Buy and similar for only $60.

    2. Re:Noise cancelling headsets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I fully agree. My NC headphone experiences can be summed up as follows:
      • SONY MBR-NC20
        Good cancelling. Excellent in machine rooms and labs. Comfortable and easy to wear on a flight.
      • Panasonic (about 80$)
        Insurance company bought these as a replacement for the NC20's. Not impressed. The build quality is noticably worse and the cancellation is poor as well. These headphones do not sit well on your head and are uncomfortable in a matter of minutes.
      • David Clark H10-13XL
        Big passive attenuation with ANC as well. Very comfortable. I can wear these all day, sadly, you can't really plug your MP3 player into these and you'd look a bit daft on the tube in these.
      Overall, the SONY's were the winner. I haven't tried the BOSE products mentioned elsewhere, but they are substantially more money than the SONY's. I'd expect the BOSE to perform well given that they make one of the best aviation headsets as well (the X).
  7. Noise-Cancelling headphones by the_greywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Electronics Now (more recently named Poptronics) published a cover article on this very subject. It's in the September '97 issue. I'm quite certain you could find it at any library that carries magazines - our local public library doesn't destroy magazines until they're 5 years old, so you might be in luck if your public library has a similar policy.

    The project is a very simple one. Microphones are mounted (with epoxy?) on the outside of the headphones, and their cable runs down along with the headphone cable. The control box has a phase adjustment knob that allows you to adjust for the distance between the microphone and speaker elements for maximum effectiveness.

    I haven't built the project myself, but if you have enough of an interest in electronics, you can build it yourself quite easily with parts from the local Radio Shack.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
    1. Re:Noise-Cancelling headphones by Snowfox · · Score: 3, Informative
      I haven't built the project myself, but if you have enough of an interest in electronics, you can build it yourself quite easily with parts from the local Radio Shack.

      Or go to your local Best Buy or similar and pick up a pair of these for about $60.

  8. active noise cancelation by Perdo · · Score: 5, Informative

    because you can never place the noise cancelation generator at the exact same place as the noise source, you will always end up with places where the noise caceling device makes the noise twice as loud. Two rocks droped in a pond create waves. some times the waves are equil amplitude and frequency but opposite polarity and cancel eachother. Other times the waves are equil frequency and aplitude but their polarity is the same. The interfearance pattern created is the basis of active noise cancelation. But since you can never get the pattern to line up perfectly, the effectiveness of noise cancelation for general white noise is horrible.

    Better to dampen the source as well as possible. Liberal use of sorbothane is extremley efective in reducing noise in a computer. shock mount every fan, the motorboard, power supply, cd drive and hard drive on sorbothane risers. Use nylon screws through the sorbothane spacers with sorbothane washers. Line the inside of your case with anechoic (egg crate) foam. Bigger fans turning at lower rpm are preferable. Centrifugal fans tend to be quieter when moving a given amount of air than radial (standard) fans. 36x is about the fastest CD drive you can get that will not induce horible vibrations in addition to their noise component. fan filters made of nylon stockings reduce fan noise considerably while standard chrome fan grills actually add to the noise a fan creates.

    My computer is relativly quiet (56db 12 inches from the air intake) while still moving air at 700 cfm through the case for cooling. I used 48 volt centrifugal furnace fans on sorbothane shock mounts to acomplish this.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:active noise cancelation by one-egg · · Score: 2
      Because you can never place the noise cancelation generator at the exact same place as the noise source, you will always end up with places where the noise caceling device makes the noise twice as loud.

      In a word, no. You neglected to note that you can have a sensor involved. Active noise cancellation involves having a microphone to pick up the signal, a bit of circuitry to adjust the phase (varying by frequency, to allow for the physical separation between the mike and the speaker), and a speaker to emit the cancellation signal. The relative position of the source doesn't matter at all. What does matter is the periodicity of the signal. True noise is hard to cancel, especially at high frequencies. Periodic signals and low-frequency random signals are quite easy to handle.

    2. Re:active noise cancelation by one-egg · · Score: 4, Funny

      There was a review of noise-cancelling headphones in the LA Times a year or two ago. Somewhat unsurprisingly, the expensive ones worked better. But the most interesting comment in the story was a social one: on airplanes, everybody talks louder than normal. With the 'phones on, the writer could clearly hear conversations 3 rows back. He found it annoying -- but not nearly as annoying as the guy just behind him who hummed "Do you know the way to San Jose" over and over throughout the flight. Without the 'phones, he was inaudible, and I'm sure he had no idea anybody could hear him. Drove the writer nuts.

    3. Re:active noise cancelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word, no. It really depends on the wavelength and the distances involved: wavelength >> distances -> you are right, wavelength <= distances -> you are wrong (even if you have a sensor). [Sidenote: wavelengths of sound are between 7m (50 Hz) and 2cm (20kHz) with the annoying midrange 2 kHz having 17 cm.] The rocks in pond is really a good example: image throwing two rocks in a pond, trying with the second rock to cancel you the wave of the first rock. It's only possible if you throw them at the same spot and exactly out of phase. Onyl if you have a small distance between noise source and cancellation emitter and a large distance to both, you can have approximate cancellation, but only in certain directions (depending on the phase of both sources).

    4. Re:active noise cancelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorbothane have some tips for damping computers at their website.

  9. Nice work, but what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a guide to karma whoring?

  10. singing by isorox · · Score: 2

    "I would like to hear some experiences with various different noise cancelling headphones paired up with MP3 players."

    Just dont start singing out loud!

  11. I can see it now by isorox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You kick back with your noise cancelling headphones on with your eyes closed, or maybe reading a book. In the next Isle a guy starts setting fire to his shoes, while just infront of you 5 blokes get a couple of knives out.

    Remember to keep some awareness of what is going on around you - turbulence warning etc.

  12. Sony MDR-NC20 Headphones by psidon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've used Sony's MDR-NC20 model headphones with no problems for almost 2 years now. They make computer labs on campus much much quieter, and allow you to listen to music at a quieter volume. They do the same in airplanes, although I've only been up with them twice. Even if only to quiet the noise (without music), they're still valuable.

    1. Re:Sony MDR-NC20 Headphones by wik · · Score: 2
      Agreed. I use them in computer labs as well (though I haven't tried taking them into the loud mainframe machine room at work). There are a few problems with them:

      • If you turn them on without any input signal (computer, MP3 player, etc), you hear some static. This goes away as soon as you turn on your music.
      • When there is a sharp noise (e.g. someone smacking a computer), the headphones amplify the sound and echo it several times.
      • They perfectly cancel out one really annoying guy's voice. Lips move, no sound. :-)
      • I can hear most other voices perfectly, but almost no computer fans. The screeching sparc hard drives are out of this unit's range

      Random question: does anyone know what type of plug/cord goes on the bottom half of these things? The extension cord is beginning to become separarated from its plug and I'd like to get a new one, but I don't know what it's called!

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    2. Re:Sony MDR-NC20 Headphones by billn · · Score: 2

      If you like those, you should see the MCDR-NC10 set. I picked up a pair several months ago, and they've preserved my sanity very well. I fly fairly often, and find them to be invaluable.
      There's a review of them here, and it's pretty much right on. I highly recommend them. They're very comfortable over long periods, and when feeding audio, you pretty much lose all external audio inputs.

      The single thing about them that bugs me is the connector cable. There's a detachable connector from the battery unit which has the headphone jack connector on one end, and an obviously proprietary connector on the other. Losing this cable would be a big pain in the ass. I would guess they have other connectors for different interface types, but it'd be nice if it was a standard conversion I could hit Radio Shack to replace.

      --
      - billn
  13. Biggest Source of Noise by Jebediah21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest source of noise in my new machine is the heatsink fan. I would love to merely quiet that one fan, but I can't think of any sane ideas to do so. Anybody had success getting those suckers to be less noisy?

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
    1. Re:Biggest Source of Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out QuietPC. I've just set up a quiet machine using their "flower" heatsink and it works very well. Still need to add a bit of cushioning around the case fans, but even then its amazing how much better the whooshing sound of air flow is compared to the phasing in and out of cheap whining fans you get on most kit.

    2. Re:Biggest Source of Noise by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      I see they have a whole line of cables. This is great because I hate noisy cables.

      --
      bp
    3. Re:Biggest Source of Noise by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2

      You could set up a thermaly controled device to vary the voltage to the fan.

    4. Re:Biggest Source of Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did several things to my machine to quiet it. First, I replaced the small heatsink with the tiny fan spinning at 5000RPM with a giant Alpha 8045 heatsink and a slow 1900RPM, 25CFM Sunon 80mm fan. It is dead quiet. My Athlon XP 1600+ runs at a cool 43C at idle and 47C when playing games. I used another 80mm Sunon as a case fan, putting it on the lower front opening of the tower. Again, it is inaudible. The next thing I did was get rid of the fan on top of the Shuttle AK31's northbridge chip and replaced it with a large heatsink. I used a Zalman ZM-NB32 for that application. No problems there. My power supply is an Antec 300W unit. Not perfectly quiet but better than most. Look into Enermax's Whisper series for even less noise. The hard drive is a Seagate Barracuda IV. Couldn't hear it if I tried. Maxtor's D740X is also worthy of consideration thanks to its fluid bearing (Check the manufacturer's number to make sure you get the right one. Maxtor makes a D740X with a ball bearing too). Both are 7200RPM drives so data throughput will be high. The last noisemaker in my machine is attached to my Geforce3, but it's fairly quiet so I felt no need to make any changes there. The final machine is barely audible. It does make a little noise, but I feel that it would bother only the most sensitive of hearing.

  14. AIWA HP-CN5 by KurdtX · · Score: 2

    I got my brother some AIWA headphones at Fry's for about $50, he's used them on several plane flights and says that he can no longer hear the engines, but can still hear the flight attendants when they ask what beverage he'd like.

    Don't know if you're trying to get rid of all sound, but they do a pretty good job of reducing backgroud noise. He's sworn he's never going back to non-noise cancelling headphones.

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
  15. Re:AIWA HP-CN5 by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a set of these headphones... they work very well. They do exactly as your brother describes; cancel out engine noise but still allow you to hear other things. They will always accompany me on a flight; after using these you just can't go back to regular headphones.

    However, I had to return mine (to Best Buy) twice because the first two pairs had problems with noise reduction only working one side.

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  16. Bose QuietComfort by rdfager · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I travel almost constantly and have tried Bose and Sony noise cancelling headphones. I recomend the Bose. They are quite a bit more money but in my opinion are well worth it. I don't leave home without them.

  17. My impressions by phr2 · · Score: 1
    1. Low cost ANR headphones (that are basically microphones playing back the ambient noise out of phase through Walkman headphones) aren't that useful for office-type noise. They're fairly useful on airliners, where there's a LOT of low-frequency rumble they can remove, and fairly quiet at mid frequencies.

    2. Expensive aviation-type ANR headphones (someone posted links) are better than the low cost ones but you still shouldn't expect any miracles. There's no substitute for an actual quiet environment.

    3. For quieting down your closet, check the products and info pages at soundproofing.org. Despite its .org domain it appears to be a regular commercial outfit, and the website design is not so great, but the stuff there looks pretty good.

  18. Always best to control the source by CharlieG · · Score: 1

    It's almost always easiest to control noise as CLOSE to the source as possible - aka, prefent the noise from being created in the first place, or else muffle it right away

    As for the headphones, I have a pair of Sennheiser HD-451s that work great - makes flying reasonable, and they sound good too

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  19. Alternative Ideas by squeegee-me · · Score: 1

    Not to come across as a jerk, but for noise canceling headphones, I know that they work by creating an equal but opposite soundwave to essentualy cancle out the original noise. Why not look at using small ear-bud type headphones and (dispite looking like a freak) put on a pair of earmuffs like you use at a gun range. Some of the better ones (like Peletor) drop the noise by almost 30 db, which is 1/8 the original sound.

    As for the sound proof closet, bad sceens from movied pop into my mind, but There are a few options, but all of them make it harder to keep the room cool if you have a half dozen computers in it. I know most THX certified movie theaters have a quick solution durring building them. Instead of one layer of sheet rock/drywall per each side of the stud, they use three per side. Gets spendy, but you when isolating 120 db from one theater and the ones next door, it works. Non smooth walls help too, like carpet, here again look at a movie theater wall. Heavy/thick drapes could also be installed or hung. I just thought of possibly building a cover box out of say two or three layers of sheet rock, adding a ventalation system to it, and putting it over the loud machine(s) in question. Imagine a cardbord box that is just put over the top of the computer, only it's two layers of sheet rock, 2x4's and a door with a hindge. Think of the old printer alcoves that were for the old dot matrix printers. They were lined with foam fingers to absorb the noise.

    Also, there are a lot of low noise computer fans now available, and ways that you can silence the hardware, by adding weight to a noise producer like a hard drive. If you bold on a chunck of aluminum to a hard drive, you can change the vibration frequency on it, changing the pitch you hear, and possibly force it to an extreme you cannot hear.

    --
    Who wants Pork Chops?
  20. Headphones - Aiwa vs. Sennheiser vs. Bose by mcmasuda · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've owned all three headphones, and currently use the Bose. Here are my impressions:

    Aiwa (I don't remember the mode), ~$50:
    - OK sound quality
    - OK noise reduction
    - Not-so-good comfort

    Sennheiser HDC-451, ~$150:
    - Good sound quality
    - Good noise reduction
    - Not-so-good comfort

    Bose QuietComfort, $300:
    - Excellent sound quality
    - Good noise reduction
    - Excellent comfort

    The problem I had with the Aiwas and the Senns is that the earpieces sit against your ear lobes like regular open-air headphones, and after a while it becomes uncomfortable. They have thin earpads that don't offer much padding - I assume to keep noise from leaking through. The Bose set has earcups that surround your ears and sit against your head, and have a soft padding material on them. I've worn these on 5-hour flights and they don't bother me at all. The Bose also have the best sound quality, though the noise reduction doesn't seem to be any better than the Senns.

    You might also want to look into Etymotic ER-4 or ER-6 headphones. These are little earbuds that seal out ambient noise (Etymotic advertises 20-25 dB passive noise reduction on the ER-4s). The ER-4s are spendy ($250-300) but the ER-6s are cheaper ($125-150). I tried a similar thing from Koss called "The Plug" but they sucked. They used a foam earplug-type material surrounding the driver on each side. The foam wasn't dense enough to seal well and it didn't hold its shape. Complete waste of time & money IMHO.

    1. Re:Headphones - Aiwa vs. Sennheiser vs. Bose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like my experience. I've just ended up doing lots of air travel and grabbed the Aiwa. Pretty good for a quick grab off the Best Buy shelf. Two nice things about the Aiwa: 1) They work as headphones even when the noise cancelling is turned off and 2) The battery is concealed in the headset so there is no external pack to deal with.

      I decided to check out the Bose between trips and bought those. They don't work as a plain headset but provide much better noise reduction and comfort than the Aiwa (alas at 6x the cost).

      I have found that I arrive at the end of a flight with substantially more energy when I use the headsets. Before: I had the option of not having in-flight entertainment or cranking up the volume to overcome the aircraft noise. After: I can listen to MP3 or the in-flight movie (the Bose, BTW, includes a variety of aircraft and home stereo adapters) at a reasonable volume and the time (ahem) flys by.

    2. Re:Headphones - Aiwa vs. Sennheiser vs. Bose by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      Sounds like my experience...

      I, too, went for the spendy bose headphones as a last resort. They work great. My only complaints: because these are rather well sealed units, after a while my ears get sweaty (but they are still very comfortable). Also, the external amplifier/battery box is cumbersome -- it sometimes falls off my desk, yanking the cord to my head.

      With the bose, some noise still gets through, but I'm always amazed when I take them off how loud my computer really is. The sound quality is good, but the amplifier injecting noise (as it is designed to do!), I don't think any noise canceling headphones can compete with a decent pair of studio-type headphones and a quiet room.

      I also tried two Sony headphones from crutchfield:
      MDR-NC5, $99 - Not a closed-ear type, so the noise reduction wasn't that great.
      MDR-NC20, $150 - This has a closed construction, but the noise reduction didn't seem to work too well - the headphones added quite a bit of their own white noise.

    3. Re:Headphones - Aiwa vs. Sennheiser vs. Bose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Etymotic ER-4S or 4P canalphones are great. They give you real attenuation by about 20 dB or so, and they work! The other plus, by the way, is that the sound you'll get is competitive with a top-end reference circumaural phone like the Sennheiser HD-600s. Believe me, the Etymotics are no slouch. I actually purchased them for the sound quality, not the isolation, which was just a side benefit! :)

  21. thousands of styrofoam cones by Laplace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try this. Line the room with hundreds (thousands?) of styrofoam cones, so that the walls look something like this:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    (that is just one wall, stupid lameness filter)
    The cones will absorb all sorts of wavelenths, and make the room really quiet. I've been in rooms like this before, and there is almost zero reverb no matter how loudly you yell or how much noise you make.

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
    1. Re:thousands of styrofoam cones by sulli · · Score: 2

      The flight attendants might give you some trouble however.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  22. "best and most cost-effective" by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    I'm getting really sick of the notion on slashdot that everything can be both cheap and perform spectacularly.

    Here's a template for all you ask-slashdotters out there:

    A Clueless Slashdroid asks: "I've recently become interested in performing Action X. So far, the best way I've found to do this is to purchase Product Y. I know Product Y costs $Z, but I'd like to know if there is some other product W out there that performs Action X as well as (or better than!) Product Y for cost $Z/3 or less. Is there a cheaper, do-it-yourself Method M that will perform just as well as either of these products? Can I do any of this with duct tape, bailing wire, and Open-Source Software ?

    Any help would be appreciated, as I am too lame to do my own research!

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:"best and most cost-effective" by CrayDrygu · · Score: 2
      I'm getting really sick of the notion on slashdot that everything can be both cheap and perform spectacularly

      Eh? Excuse me, but "cheap" and "cost-effective" are not the same...they're almost opposites. "Cheap" to me means "spend the least amount of money possible, usually sacrificing quality."

      "Cost-effective," on the other hand... well, I can't think of how to shorten it into a similar quip (it's 3:30am, gimme a break). But to me, that means getting the best price/performance ratio. There does exist a point where purchasing a higher quality just doesn't matter, because the differences can't be heard or felt. So in this situation, the "cost effective" solution would be not what's cheapest, and not necessarily the highest quality on the market, but rather the solution that gets the job done for the least amount of money.

      Cost-effectiveness is a good thing.

      --

      --
      "I personal[ly] think Unix is "superior" because on LSD it tastes like Blue." -- jbarnett

  23. When I need peace and quiet... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


    Whenever ambient noise starts getting on my nerves I put on The Who's Live at Leeds and listen to it at a naturalistic 130 db. By the time it's over, the background noise has faded almost to inaudibility. Just a bit of a ringing sensation, and that's about it. Like, you can hardly even hear the landlord pounding on the door.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  24. Re: Thermal fan by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

    Good point. I wish I had the time to sit down and actually learn how to do it. *grumbles about college taking so much time*

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  25. first link is broken, s/wise/wize/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject says it all

  26. i find your ideas fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pleez subscirbe me to youq newqloster!

  27. Your sig by Dwonis · · Score: 2
    Nobody ever got fired for choosing Microsoft.

    I wouldn't count on it.

    Nobody ever looked stupid for choosing Linux.

    2.4.15.

  28. planes,e tc by joekool · · Score: 1

    If by traveling in planes, you mean flying in prop planes, helicopters, anything where you are plugging into the plane systems, etc, then what you want is a set of David Clarks. Industry standard since sometime around World War II, watch a movie or TV show. If the pilot is wearing a light green headset, they are david clarks. I occaisonaly wear mine here in the server room at work, when the noise gets to me, and the room just goes silent. The only problem is it looks a bit odd. This reminds me--does anyone out there have a good set of plans to convert military style aviation headsets to general aviation? (I know about the adaptor that is available, it costs more than these headsets do).
    Note: General aviation headsets will work with standard stereo and computer equipment, and can be had at relativly low costs, and the sound that comes out is unbelievable in quality, compared to any thing else that I personally have experienced

    --

    Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
  29. Re:Your sig (way OT) by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

    Both are statements assumed true by most /.ers, but neither statement really is. What's the problem?

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  30. sound holography by markj02 · · Score: 2

    Your statement is true only for two point sources and infinite space. If you have many speakers enclosed in a room, you can do a lot better. The real limit here is causality and predictability, not sources.