Slashdot Mirror
Investigating Super Efficient Laser Propulsion Leads to Serendipitous UV effects
wvanhuffel writes "In this article from spacedaily the authors may be on the road to creating the impulse engine....then again, maybe not. It's life imitating art again!" The article details the exploration of the use of lasers and more importantly a new effect when certain materials (in this case lead) are struck by the laser, apparantly a predictable secondary explosion 50 millionths of a second after the target is struck, emitting UV light.
Remember, I'm only 16 so I don't have enough grounding in particle physics to make a more solid theory.
The particles are ionised because the laser (a highly coherent beam of focused photons) interacts with the electrons in the lead atoms. The photons literally knock the electrons in the atoms of the lead further back into the lead by giving them energy and raising the resistance back towards the laser.
A lot of energy is, at the same time, given to lots of particles of lead. The particles of lead given energy are those in the direct path of the laser and thus are those which have had their electrons removed by the laser, thus producing the ionised lead cloud.
With all this energy stored up in the electrons, which have no atoms to return to, it has to go somewhere! The electrons cannot enter the outer electron shells of the lead atoms, so they are bounced around the lead, attracted by the gravitational pull of the atoms but repelled by the electrons, while possibly forcing electrons with less energy than them out of the outer electron shells and replacing them.
When an electron is forced out of its shell (as in the first case 1millionth of a second after the laser discontinues) it emits the energy it had stored in the bond, like splitting the bonds in an actual atom, but with less intensity. When the electrons are forced out in the second case (50 millionths of a second after the first wave), energy is used in making the new bonds and the same ammount is used in breaking the old bonds, BUT the electrons making the new bond and breaking the old ones already have a lot of energy from the laser, which is released when the electrons enter the outer electron shells of the atoms, because the energy released from breaking the bonds cannot enter the energy-saturated electrons and the energy taken in from making the bond is already present in the electrons entering the shell.
They should try thicker/thinner films.
--Mike--
Sorting through this unexpected discovery is a secondary concern. The main goal is testing different materials under different lengths and strengths of laser pulses to see what might give the most efficient result.
I have been watching the discover and history channels lately, and one thing that seems to stick out like a sore thumb in science is people finding incredible discoveries, and then shelving them or ignoring them becuase it isn't part of the expierement that was being performed. Then maybe 5, 10 or even 100 years later someone will stumble on to it and change the world.
If these guys are just going to table this really intruiging discovery for a few years while they work on ho-hum materials testing, then is has GOT to be big...
"Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
This is a reaction engine. Lead may be the reactant, and lasers may be the energy source, but the propulsion is still caused by tossing mass away from the direction you wish to move.
A true impulse engine does not lose mass, just energy, and is still a fiction. That's not what these folks are working on.
If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
My favorite part of the article is the closing paragraph: giant ionizing lasers in space! Sounds like a good excuse for a hack-a-thon. I've always wanted to write my name in hundred-mile high letters...
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
This is huge. The reason rockets are so expensive is that they have to carry their own fuel. Put the fuel on the ground, and you can launch cheap.
This system doesn't get you all the way there, since you're still carrying your reaction mass, but it's pretty good - they're talking forty times as efficient with enough thrust to work for a launch. (Unlike ion drives, which are efficient but low thrust.)
A better engine than this one is the VASIMR. It is a plasma engine that is under development. It ionizes hydrogen with microwaves an then accelerates them with magnetic fields. While it doen't provide thrust like a chemical rocket, it certainly has many, many times more thrust than a ion engine. It has some oomph to it. I really don't think that the ablative engine that this article was about would be good to launch vehicles into space. You would need a fscking huge laser to propel the ablative rocket into space. The cost of the giant laser would outweigh the cost savings of not using a huge amount of rocket fuel.
For cheap launches, you really need somthing like the x-42 scramjet spaceplane. That would cut costs of launching by a factor of 10 with no giant lasers.
VASIMR will get a specific impulse of 30,000 seconds compared to 500 seconds for the shuttle's engines. A specific impulse is the number of seconds 1 kg. of fuel could produce 1 kg. of thrust. The specific impulse of the VASIMR is 60 times better than the shuttle. That's even better than this ablative engine.
That would allow cheap interplanetary voyages anywhere in the solar system, using very little fuel. Using these engines, you could get to Saturn in less than a year. It would also allow slow intersteller trips of around 1% the speed of light.
Also, VASIMRs could be easily, cheaply, and quickly refueled for more missions.Interplanetary travel could become cheap. I bet each ship would cost around 5 billion dollars initialy. After that, it's cheap. After each trip, an X-42 could come and restock the ship with fuel and supplies. That would only cost around 50 million. We could send tens of thousands to colonize Mars.
BTW: On this article, it says the VASIMR gets 10,000 seconds. It can reach 30,000 with further development.
Read about the VASIMR here
If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
You just want a frickin' laser beam.
God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
the femtosecond pulse might induce an
ultrasonic wave of roughly the same frequency,
which bounces off the other side
of the slab...did they try varying
the lead thickness ?
the timescales would be coherent with that.
Google passes Turing test : see my journal
When something is moving, it has a larger mass than when it is stationary. General theory of relativity. This energy mass must come from somewhere. So, of course a pure impulse drive is impossible. Mass must be lost by something and given to the object you want to move in the form of energy. Energy does not weigh much, so if they could develop a 99.99% efficient reaction drive, it would begin to function almost like an impulse drive.
Cool! Amazing Toys.
Say, didn't one of those recent experimental NASA probes have an Ion engine? IIRC, it didn't work very well or at least it died very quickly after firing.
But the principle is/was to charge "space dust" electrically which will then propel the vehicle forward. A little bit like jet engine, really. The drive doesn't use it's own mass as a reaction source, but I'm rather sure that's not what the original technobabble engine principle was all about.