Testing Roller Coasters WIth Fred
An anonymous reader submits: "An AP article looks at the science of roller coaster testing. In general, a coaster must pass a "Fred" test, Fred being something analgous to a crash test dummy used in the automobile industry. Fred has a bunch of sensors in him that record data during the ride's operation and provide it all to engineers ensuring a ride's safety. Also discussed is pending regulation over G-Forces in New Joisey."
I sort of assumed roller coaster designers and test engineers used Mary Jane.
I mean, I thought coasters were designed with custom CAD systems that could compute the forces at any point in the ride.
Unless "Fred" can scream or say "Dude, that was awesome/lame/whatever!" at the end, I'm not sure what "he" contributes.
The problem isn't really the G-forces (acceleration) involved. The more important factor is the "jerk", or change in acceleration. Acceleration is what causes you to move in the opposite direction of the movement. Jerk is what causes you to change the rate or direction of that movement. The jerk is what is harmful to your body, in particular your neck.
Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
Its a good thing Fred wasn't around back when Action Park was open (for those who don't live in Jersey, AP was a water park that featured non-stop action packed injuries) as he probably would have been severely screwed up in the process. No, better to use New Jersey residents since they just keep coming back for more! As for the engineers, etc involved, the way they went about designing Action Park is they walked into a local Kindergarten classroom and said to the kids, "Tell us about the bestest rides ever that you would make for a water park!" The kids handed them crayon sketches of various slides/deathtraps, and the engineers took em and built em straight from the drawings (they figured blueprints were for pansies). The result: Action Park, a place where fun is lurking around every corner (along with a lawsuit).
"What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
Maybe we should be handing out Darwin awards instead of legislating the fun out of these places.
j;In New Jersey, ride regulators have proposed what would be the nation's first ride design standards. The regulations would include standards for ride restraints and limits on G-forces.
Markey says eight people have died from brain injuries on thrill rides worldwide in the last 10 years.
Your tax dollars at work, ladies and gentlemen.
What is wrong with Barney?
eight people. hundreds of millions of riders every year, eight people die. those eight people are probably the lucky ones who would win the lottery and get struck by lightning the next day.
8 people dead? this makes riding roller-coasters safer then cars. Safer then owning a gun, safer then being black even (just kidding)
Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
almost all of the injuries listed in the article were caused by SHEER STUPIDITY. Why are people so stupid?
.25 seconds will kill you. I hope the jersey law takes this into consideration.
The amount of people dead, as a percent of the amount of people riding the coasters makes them far safer then MANY other activities. Less chance injuring yourself on a coaster then driving, sex, and owning a gun.
G force limits: as stated above, it is the amount of instintanious Gs at a given point. 4 Gs is survivable easily, but not when Fred experiances 4 Gs in
Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
hey... the link to the msnbc article doesn't work. anyone got a substitute?
Why not remove the signs that are ineffective? What could it hurt? A person with any semblance of common sense would follow most the guidelines, and if they don't then all we lose is a future cast member of Springer
-Create seat-belt optional rides? The hilarity would never end.
-The signs warning those with heart problems and pregnant women? You'd think that they should know better. Rip that one down
-Keep the height restrictions signs. It serves to humble the short ones out there.
Our litigant society knows no bounds. Too many things have metaphorically rounded edges for fear of a lawsuit. It gets depressing.