Passport May Violate Euro Privacy
good-n-nappy writes: "More shocking news about Passport. The EU thinks Passport may violate privacy. Of course, Microsoft claims that all data is supplied voluntarily (for now... cue evil laugh). Too bad we in the U.S. will likely have to continue sacrificing privacy for national security." Part of a continuing series.
...but it was explained to me by a friend who uses Passport that one of its main features was to sheild consumers from having to give their credit card information to every webfront said user purchases from. Instead, the webfront is given a confirmation number on the transaction. I ask you, how exactly does this make MS evil? Having never used Passport, I'm relying on his view for this (and seeing as how I've known him for 15 years, he's in the tech market, knows his stuff, etc...)
How about a little less (right!) biased comments for the stories from the staff?
Mod away. My karma's good.
Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
Even if MS had a great privacy policy (which it doesn't), how safe can you be trusting them with personal data? Their history of insecurity makes me think twice about telling them anything. Remember the Hotmail exploit a few years back? What happens when someone cracks Passport server?
As far as MS can tell I'm still an old lady from Qatar...
I guess Jon Katz was right that "modern media is about making money, and that depends entirely on selecting stories that entertain, titillate, blow up or confront." Add bash Microsoft to that list.
This past winter I recieved a quite lengthy letter from Visa (revised terms of service), the jist of which was that they were going to sell my personal information and spending habbits to third parties and there's not a damn thing I can do about it. So I canceled my card as that was the only option I had.
Credit card companies are just as evil as M$, if not more so.
Linus may be from Finland, Women may be from Venus, and Sauron may be plotting to overthrow the last blood of Numenor.
The UK Data Protection Act 1998 (http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/19980029.htm ) governs how 'data-holders' make capture and process personal data.
a ta_Protection.html ) and replaces a similar act from 1984
This Act is an EU treaty obligation ( http://www.privacy.org/pi/intl_orgs/ec/final_EU_D
The UK Government can be rightly criticised on many aspects of IT legislation, however the Data Protection is not one.
The Act codifies 'Eight Principals'.
1. fairly and lawfully processed;
2. processed for limited purposes;
3. adequate, relevant and not excessive;
4. accurate;
5. kept no longer than necessary;
6. processed in accordance with the data subject's rights;
7. secure;
8. not transferred to countries without adequate protection.
It seem likely to me that the MS-Passport violates several of these, though most notable numbers 7 and 8.
The Data Protection Registra/Commissioner.
http://www.dataprotection.gov.uk
Ignorance excused.
The two most obvious problems with the Microsoft Passport is that 1) It shares your personal data with vendors in countries that do not protect that data. That is a breach of the Eight Data Protection Principal. 2) The Data must be secure, if not this is a violation of the Seventh Principal.
Aren't hotmail accounts now part of the passport world?
If so, has anyone noticed the little fact that passport passwords are case insensitive?
Great security...
I just tried to log onto the ninemsn.com.au epilepsy chat room for the first time, and found that it had already filled in my username from my Hotmail account, and inserted my email address into the form. I guess some cookies had not been deleted since I checked my Hotmail. So now Microsoft knows that I have epilepsy, and they know my email address. I think the Europeans are trying to stop just this type of data collection. Good luck to them, I only hope Australia picks up its act and does something about it too.