Copyright Rules Eased For Distance Learning
fixion writes "This article in the Chronicle of Higher Education reports that the House Judiciary Committee unanimously approved bill S.487, the Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act of 2001 yesterday. The TEACH Act updates the Copyright Act to make it easier for educators involved in online distance education to use copyrighted materials without violating fair use guidelines. The Senate passed it well over a year ago, but it has been languishing in the House Judiciary Committee eve since, held up by Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI). Since the Senate and House Committee passed identical bills, getting it through the full House and to the President to sign should happen fairly quickly now."
Please, please, please...for the love of God...do not abuse this law. I don't want to hear anything about anyone trying to defend sharing their MP3 collection by saying they were just trying to teach people about audio compression schemes. This is a damn good law and I don't want the 3l33t w4rez d00d's messing it up for the rest of us.
I liked the old Title 17, Section 110(2), which this bill takes away. It seems to me that this version is much more restrictive.
Heres an intelligently forewarded email I got from a friend today. It seems the 3l33t w4rez d00d's might even have a chance...
Oh well... The law might be useful for as long as it takes to search KaZaA and write a cheque. The kidz dont give a crap about anyone else. The 'Stellas' site is under construction.
Ali
Ph33r m3!!!
Old law will be in italics, new law will not.
p 1.html#110? c107:1:./tem p/~c107RwkEFX::
(A) the performance or display is a regular part of the systematic instructional activities of a governmental body or a nonprofit educational institution; and
(A) the performance or display is made by, at the direction of, or under the actual supervision of an instructor as an integral part of a class session offered as a regular part of the systematic mediated instructional activities of a governmental body or an accredited nonprofit educational institution;
(C) the transmission is made primarily for-
(i) reception in classrooms or similar places normally devoted to instruction, or
(ii) reception by persons to whom the transmission is directed because their disabilities or other special circumstances prevent their attendance in classrooms or similar places normally devoted to instruction, or
(iii) reception by officers or employees of governmental bodies as a part of their official duties or employment;
(C) the transmission is made solely for, and, to the extent technologically feasible, the reception of such transmission is limited to--
`(i) students officially enrolled in the course for which the transmission is made; or
`(ii) officers or employees of governmental bodies as a part of their official duties or employment; and
`(D) the transmitting body or institution--
`(i) institutes policies regarding copyright, provides informational materials to faculty, students, and relevant staff members that accurately describe, and promote compliance with, the laws of the United States relating to copyright, and provides notice to students that materials used in connection with the course may be subject to copyright protection; and
`(ii) in the case of digital transmissions--
`(I) applies technological measures that reasonably prevent--
`(aa) retention of the work in accessible form by recipients of the transmission from the transmitting body or institution for longer than the class session; and
`(bb) unauthorized further dissemination of the work in accessible form by such recipients to others; and
And it continues this way, they also removed exemptions for religious uses, AND the previous version had an exemption for use of copywrited material used to gather funds for a charitible donation without permission. This is removed.
Compare the 2 versions yourself!
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92cha
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D
...until school systems get enough funding to buy modern equipment, which will DRM'ed out the wazoo. Fortunately most government bodies are more interesting in kissing up to corporate funds that funding education, so schools will be using outdated, fully functional stuff for a while.
...and it's stale BS too; it's been circulating for a long time. Not a single one of the cases checks out. The whole thing is a fabrication. See this page on the ever-reliable Snopes. It's always worth doing a background check on these things before passing them on. A google search on "terrence dickson" brought the Snopes page up first, followed by hundreds of repetitions of the original canard.
As someone already noted, the actual "Stella" McDonald's/hot coffee case is real, but not so easily deemed a "frivolous" lawsuit when you examine the facts and background of the case.
Kiscica
My fsckup, and I'm never short of them.
Ali
Ph33r m3!!!