Slashdot Mirror


Genetically Engineering Sheep for Larger, Stronger Hindquarters

baldingbobo writes "Duke and Agriculture department scientists are reporting that they have discovered an elusive, mutated gene that causes certain sheep to have unusually big and muscular bottoms. The discovery is especially exciting, said the researchers, because the unusual gene has evaded all the traditional means of detection for nearly a decade. They've been searching for this advance for nearly a decade.There are photos available as well."

71 comments

  1. I like big butts, and I cannot lie! by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    Ummm.... Yeah......

    Let's just say it took me a while to realize that there might be an economic motivation behind this research...

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  2. For the sake of tidiness... by realgone · · Score: 1
    ...please keep all J-Lo jokes in this thread.

    Thanks!
    The Management

  3. Does this mean... by PSwim · · Score: 1

    Baby Got Ba-a-a-a-ack?

  4. possible drawbacks by agnosonga · · Score: 1
    It took me a while to realize the benefit
    but what im wondering, is if there are any drawbacks.
    namely: possible cancer

    any other ideas?

    1. Re:possible drawbacks by ktulus+cry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depending on the actual mechanism of the gene, the sheep most likely would not contract cancer, unless it allowed for CONTINUED muscle growth throughout life. Ordinarily, most mammals are born with a certain number of muscle cells - the number never changes, merely the bulk of each cell. Unrestricted cell division, however, is another word for cancer. Humans could not contract cancer either, merely from eating particularly large muscle groups.

    2. Re:possible drawbacks by agnosonga · · Score: 1

      but if it was given to humans?

    3. Re:possible drawbacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about that? I was under the impression women did not grow much new muscle but men did. And that muscle fibers were destroyed during exertion but were replentished.

    4. Re:possible drawbacks by ktulus+cry · · Score: 1, Informative

      Muscle cells are usually not destroyed during exertion - they are damaged, and rebuilt, larger than before. They can be destroyed under too heavy of stress, but they are not replaced.

  5. Olympic sprinters by Cuchullain · · Score: 1

    Better ban genetically enhanced athletes now before the olympic sprints start looking like a roadrunner cartoon...

    Cuchullain

    --
    "If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not rightly owned if it is not shared." -St. Augustine
  6. big breasted fowl by tid242 · · Score: 1
    i had heard once that chickens and turkeys were having trouble breeding because their breasts were getting too big... is this then the same kind of thing?

    sort of like engineering people to be fatter... oh wait, that's a work in progress...

    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    1. Re:big breasted fowl by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      IIRC domestic turkeys can't mate - their breasts are too large for them to get their genitalia in contact with each other.

      Yay for artificial insemination and big turkey dinners!

    2. Re:big breasted fowl by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > IIRC domestic turkeys can't mate - their breasts are too large for them to get their genitalia in contact with each other.
      >
      > Yay for artificial insemination and big turkey dinners!

      /me adds another entry to "Jobs I Don't Want, No Matter How Bad The Economy Gets", just below "goatse.cx guy".

  7. without looking... by rodentia · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I nominate this article for gratuitous goatse.cx bait of the year.

    --
    illegitimii non ingravare
    1. Re:without looking... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1, Troll

      i second your gaping nomination.

    2. Re:without looking... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      Giver of a third nomination

  8. excellent by tps12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope they start distributing this to white girls.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  9. homo billybobiens by Lepruhkawn · · Score: 1

    Call me when they find the hidden gene that separates homo sapiens from homo billybobiens.

    --
    Jesus saves....And takes 1/2 damage.
  10. Scotsman by FroMan · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How does that kilt joke go?

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    1. Re:Scotsman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, Scotland declared a national holiday.

    2. Re:Scotsman by FroMan · · Score: 1

      <rant>Who the stuff modded this as redundant! I was the first one to make the scotsman comment of any style. You crack puppy.</rant>

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  11. Unrealistic body image by ApharmdB · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn it! When will the farmers and sheep realize that the body images presented to them by Hollywood are unrealistic and stop trying to force the sheep to attain some fake "perfection"? Those sheep on the cover of PlayBaa are not realistic and only make up .0001% of the population. *Psychiatrists take note: Body image disorder groups for sheep will be the hot topic in a few years.

  12. This is the best news article. by Tom7 · · Score: 3, Funny



    GIANT SHEEP ASSES.

  13. Now that's funny by drew_kime · · Score: 0, Troll

    Though goatse.cx thread down below is actually funny *and* ontopic for once.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  14. Won't this make it very painful by Krueger+Industrial+S · · Score: 1

    for farmers to have sex with sheep?

    1. Re:Won't this make it very painful by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're not familiar with the wisdom-in-verse - "The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'"

  15. Obligatory FatBastard Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Big-Bottomed sheep, ya sey?

    That's dead sexxxyyyyyy!

  16. Ahh, science by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the first story ever where the trolling is virtually indistinguishable from the plethora of +1 Funny kharma whores. 10 points to whomever can come up with a post worthy of +1 Insightful.

    -Sean

    1. Re:Ahh, science by smoondog · · Score: 2

      Yes!!!!

      -Sean

  17. data vacuum by gene_tailor · · Score: 1

    I wish I could say something insightful, but the peer-reviewed data on this won't be publically available until 5 October (according to the journal where it will be published, Genome Research). Trying to interpret what this actually means from a press release is futile.

    --
    It also occurs to me that if one was drowning, yelling "Help! I'm drowning and I lost my bikini top" would probably be m
  18. ...and there was much jubilation in Scotland. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Q: Why do Scotsmen wear kilts?

    A: Because sheep can hear a zipper from a mile away.

    Q: Why do Englishmen wear pants?

    A: Because goats are deaf.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    1. Re:...and there was much jubilation in Scotland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I was thinking it was the Scots who were deaf!

  19. Peals of delight heard in Aberdeen by Lux+Interior · · Score: 2, Redundant
    From the article,
    Researchers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Duke University Medical Center discovered a gene called "callipyge," (pronounced cal - ah - PEEJ) meaning "beautiful buttocks" in Greek, because the sheep have large, muscular bottoms with very little fat.
    The Scots are behind this research, aren't they??

    Sorry... so easy... couldn't resist..*guffaw*

  20. The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know what that reason is, and never will because it doesn't work like that.

    Killing for food carries a moral price that I'm not prepared to pay.

    Killing for food doesn't only kill the food.

    I'd rather not consume the rotting corpses of the dead thanks.

    YMMV

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 2
      Killing for food carries a moral price that I'm not prepared to pay.
      What moral price is that? Killing a non-sentient being for essential nutrients?
      Killing for food doesn't only kill the food.
      What else does it kill? I don't understand.
      I'd rather not consume the rotting corpses of the dead thanks
      I rather would. It tastes SOOOOO much better than anything non-meat. And it supplies the above mentioned nutrients. Would you rather get them in the form that we have evolved to best absorb, or from a pill that is made from a polluting factory?

      I don't understand what your subject line or the first line of your post mean. Can you explain them please?
      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    2. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by jareds · · Score: 2

      I'd rather not consume the rotting corpses of the dead thanks.

      Same here. I tried putting some meat in a pit in my backyard with a big block of ice, but it keeps melting. If only we had some sort of technology that could keep things cold.

    3. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      What moral price is that? Killing a non-sentient being for essential nutrients?

      non-essential

      My criteria for who deserves death to satisfy my urges goes beyond a test of anthropmorphism.

      What else does it kill? I don't understand.
      High fat foods, primarily meat and dairy products are over consumed in the Americas & Europe leading to health problems and a burdon on the health care systems.
      The high protein levels in a meat/dairy diet leech calcium from the body causing osteoporosis
      The production of meat and dairy as a massive consumer of water. As a method of food production it is very wasteful compared to other non-meat means. People starve while we freeze beef and pour milk down the drain. Europe has massive over production of milk. Farmers can hardly give it away. And yet we're awash with the stuff.
      This waste of money lowers the standard of living of us all.
      Personally I have crohns disease. A disease linked to the consumption of cows milk. I will require hospital treatment, including surgery [once already], throughout my life. The govt. advertises this poison on TV as some sort of health drink!

      Maybe you need a quote :

      from here
      Former Chairman of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University, Frank Oski, M.D. even has a book called Don't Drink Your Milk which blames every second health problem kids suffer on hormone-ridden commercial milk. Sixty percent of ear infections in kids under six years of age are milk-induced, and milk consumption is the number one cause of iron-deficiency anemia in infants today according to the American Association of Pediatrics.

      It tastes SOOOOO much better than anything non-meat.
      Selfish in the extreme. "I'm going to kill and eat you because I like it."

      And it supplies the above mentioned nutrients
      Very badly. Not to mention the growth hormones, preservatives and anti-biotics that you get as the payload.

      Would you rather get them in the form that we have evolved to best absorb, or from a pill that is made from a polluting factory?
      The digestion of meat is a long process. It is my belief that we have not evolved to meat in the volumes we do today. Again witness the levels of heart disease etc.
      Many people lack the ability to digest lactose. In fact lactose tolerance is only really present in white people, built up from years of poisoning themselves.

      And finally, accellerating growth in animals is selfish and can only damage the health of the animals involved. GM sometimes scientists argue that they are just boosting nature. Nature doesn't need a boost thank you very much. We already massively over produce and then destory food. We grow grain to feed to cattle who use most of it to maintain their day to day existence.

      It's insane. And the best people can come up with as excuses are "it's natural" and "it tastes nice". Same can be said for crack cocaine. Stay strung out on beef if you like. I kicked the habit.

      12 years dairy & meat free & still going stong.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by Samus · · Score: 2

      I kill, you kill, even my trees in my back yard kill. Yes thats right that big tree in my back yard that shades the ground so well kills more infants in a year than I can count. I also happen to think that its a very strong majestic beautiful tree. I don't think its a murderer. Its nature is to do what it must to survive and grow. In fact our own instincts have evolved to adore that which is best at ruining others. Do you prefer the sickly flower or the full bright colored flower? I'm not sure what seperates us from animals and plants in this. Probably precious little. You choose to eat the rotting corpses of plants. I choose not to limit myself. Just don't make the mistake that you aren't killing for food and that what you are eating is not the rotting corpse of something dead.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    5. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

      I concede to most of your milk argument points, however I doubt that it is possible to convince me not to eat meat.
      Sorry, I love rotting animal flesh more than almost anything else in life.

      The link on your sig is very interesting. I'm not doubting its overall story, but I do wonder how biased the facts are.

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    6. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by TFloore · · Score: 2
      Blockquoteth the poster:
      And finally, accellerating growth in animals is selfish and can only damage the health of the animals involved.

      I found this too funny to pass up commenting on...

      You're worried about damaging the health on an animal we'll be slaughtering to eat in a couple months?

      Do you complain that people fleeing from a forest fire are disturbing the natural beauty of the area by putting tire tracks in the field right before the fire sweeps through and burns the dried grass to the ground?
      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    7. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by gene_tailor · · Score: 1
      >Personally I have crohns disease. A disease linked to the consumption of cows milk.

      Well, there is a controversial theory that Crohn's disease may be caused by a mycobacterium that is carried by cows, although no one has ever shown that transmission from cow-to-human via milk happens in the real world. If the rest of your statements are based on logic like this, I'm not impressed. Anyway, if you are so convinced it's milk-related, have you tried clarithromycin/rifabutin therapy?

      PS. Yes, I know someone personally who has Crohn's disease and I know it sucks.

      --
      It also occurs to me that if one was drowning, yelling "Help! I'm drowning and I lost my bikini top" would probably be m
    8. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      You're worried about damaging the health on an animal we'll be slaughtering to eat in a couple months?

      yes, although I'm not part of the 'we'.

      It's not funny at all.
      It's tragic.

      And your tire tracks condense the soil making post fire recovery more difficult.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    9. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I'd rather not consume the rotting corpses of the dead thanks.

      Me neither. I personally prefer the freshest corpses of the dead possible. Rotting flesh is just unhealthy, and your body knows it. If you tried fresh or well preserved meat, you'd probably like it more.

      Personally, I'm all for sheep with increased thigh size. You should really try a good fresh leg of lamb, roasted slowly over a fire with a good rosemary and garlic rub. Very tasty.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    10. Re:The rate of evolution evolved for good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough with the blockquoteth shit already!

  21. How long 'til this hits my butcher's display case? by 0x69 · · Score: 1

    The article notes that sheep with the gene convert their food into meat 30% more efficiently than normal sheep. Are there any other slashdotters breaking out the mint jelly and dreaming of more & cheaper lamb for their dining pleasure?

    --
    It's easy to make up & spread cool- and credible-sounding stuff. Finding & checking hard facts is hard work.
  22. P Diddy by briglass · · Score: 1

    I heard P Diddy was going to serve Callipyge Cocktails at his next party. RIP Biggie (new meaning there maybe?)

    --

    ----
    "Those who quote others are more likely to one day be quoted" -Tom Planter
  23. Next items on project list by Linux_ho · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    include $sig;
    1;
    1. Re:Next items on project list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about "A man with three buttocks" ?

  24. missing genes by benh57 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The most interesting part of the article, IMO was down towards the bottom:

    "This is the first time in animals where a mutation has been found that leads to the identification of a new gene, rather than analyzing a known gene to find its mutation," said Jirtle. "As scientists, we are missing many genes and their mutations by using the traditional approach of linkage analysis to locate and analyze candidate genes."

    This new technique could lead to lots of new discoveries, it seems...

    1. Re:missing genes by Dot.Sig · · Score: 1

      >> the most interesting part of the article, IMO was >>down towards the bottom:

      do you mean the tail or the kneecaps?

  25. Hmmmmm by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that I too can have an unusually big and muscular bottom?

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
  26. Somebody's got to say it... by n9hmg · · Score: 1

    Baby got baaack.

  27. Frankensheep sex by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

    Will these genetically engineered frankensheep still be a good lay for lonely farmers, and fraternity pledges? If not, they can still get goats.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  28. Isn't this to protect the sheep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this to protect the sheep from Scotsmen? I think your average scot might be a little less randy if he knew mr. sheep had a muscular butt capable of tearing off what's under the kilt.

  29. Ye gods... by mstorer3772 · · Score: 0, Troll

    If this whole article isn't a perfect straight line, I don't know what is.

    We've got the scottish jokes, the 'black-girl's-butts' jokes, the goatsex-guy jokes, and who know's what else looming in the wings.

    I actually pitty the poor lonely scottsman that first makes a pass at one of these things. I'm guessing they kick HARD! Probably jump relatively well too.

    --
    Fooz Meister
  30. Which bacteria cause food poisoning? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    The bacteria most commonly found (about 40,000 cases annually [in the UK]) are called Campylobacter. These may be present in unpasteurised milk or raw poultry. Birds pecking the tops of milk bottles may infect the milk on the doorstep but in most cases the contaminated food is not identified.

    Salmonella is the next most commonly found group of bacteria (about 30,000 per annum). They may be present in raw meat, poultry and occasionally eggs. For the remainder, Staphylococcus Aureus, Clostridium Perfringens and Bacillus Cereus produce toxins or poisons in food which may result in severe vomiting. C. Perfringens is usually associated with meat and B. Cereus with rice.

    Some variants of normal intestinal bacteria are a cause of food poisoning. A particularly severe type is caused by E. Coli 0157. It is present in some cattle and may contaminate raw meat. It can cause bloody diarrhoea and kidney failure, particularly in the elderly, but is only rarely a cause of food poisoning.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  31. 3 kinds of bacteria? out of how many thousands? by diesel_jackass · · Score: 2

    so what you're saying is that what doesn't kill you will only make you stronger, right? ;-)

    why is it that almost *every* vegan or vegetarian that i've ever known has had significantly more health problems than omnivorous(sp) humans? i've only known one vegan who was actually healthy. He'd taken martial arts his whole life, plus he took supplements and worked out in the gym 4 days a week. personally i've had more digestive problems eating vegetarian(tofu) stuff than i ever have had with meat. i've even accidentally eaten raw chicken, spoiled milk, and i eat every burger/steak rare. i eat hamburger helper at least twice a week by myself.

    don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that we should go out and kill every delicious animal out there. personally i probably wouldn't eat as much meat as i do if i had to personally kill and watch every animal die. if i had my way, i would just pump billions of dollars into stem cell research until we have the technology to grow meat in a test tube... or meat on a stick... mmmm... meat on a stick...

  32. Re:Is this the same gene... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1, Troll

    come on!!! only one goatse link? wtf?!?

    how about posting some "Creative Goatse Links"?

    check this out: http://www.microsoft.com [microsoft.com]

    --
    <-- don't go there

  33. Re:Is this the same gene... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1, Troll

    this one is my favorite though... good ol' google:
    google

  34. our bias? in the face of all the rest by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Yes, meat is one of the most addictive drugs of all.

    I can't deny that the taste and texture of meat is a moutwatering delight but that's not enough for me.

    I do wonder how biased the facts are.
    Take a look around. How many millions of dollars is spent promoting the sale of meat & dairy compared to the few loonies who say 'er, excuse me that might nto be the best idea'.
    In our schools it was made a legal requirement that children get half a pint of milk a day provided by the state. A policy that might have directly put me in hospital. [I don't know which milk made me ill of course].
    "Milk is good for you".
    How many people can you find that would say that and yet *never* have even looked into the subject themselves because they trust the government.

    Do you trust the government to be unbiased?

    I can find you a ream of quotes from respected physicians and other top notch scientists on the negative effects of milk & dairy & vivisection. In the end it comes down to who's bias you want to go with.

    Eevn if you end up saying that 'well the truth must lie somewhere in the middle' then that raises two points :
    1. If the antis gave up speaking then the middle shifts. We try and back up our arguments with science and the voices of scientists because we are constsntly faced with the lie that emotions are no basis for making decisions about the suffering of others.
    2. Does a neutral stance justify the factory farming of dairy cows [and other 'food animals']? It is a barbaric exploitative industry.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  35. my grandad smoked unitl he was 90 et.c etc. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    I've been vegan for 11 years.

    My only health problem is crohns disease.
    A disease linked to the consumption of milk.

    The UK health dept. suggests that the nation cust down on its meat intake. Our popluation is regarded to have been at it's healthiest during and just after World War two when rationing was imposed and meat and dairy was in short supply.

    mmmm, meat on a stick, now that would rule.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  36. "it's natural" is not a defence by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Because everything that ever happened and ever will happen is natural.

    Do we, as civilised poeple, need to deliberately cause such pain and suffering to our fellow creatures?

    Many plants have evolved such that being eaten in part or whole is part of their reproduction.

    I choose not to limit myself.
    In doing so you limit others.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:"it's natural" is not a defence by Samus · · Score: 2

      Do we, as civilised poeple, need to deliberately cause such pain and suffering to our fellow creatures?
      It's unavoidable. By consuming resources you cannot hope to avoid it. Even walking in the park can harm unknown numbers of creatures. This is not meant to be a license to go on a killing spree though. As with all things there needs to be a responsible balance. I don't think factory farms are a responsible idea. I don't think cramming 10 chickens in a cage and cutting of their beaks is a responsible thing. If we're going to kill'em we owe them something better than that.

      Many plants have evolved such that being eaten in part or whole is part of their reproduction.
      They merely take advantage of a situation they have little control over.

      I choose not to limit myself.
      In doing so you limit others.

      In living I consume resources. Therefore I limit others by keeping resources from them. Only in death will I be able to stop limiting others because I will no longer be consuming anything.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    2. Re:"it's natural" is not a defence by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      well, personally I like to think that I strive to survive causing the least disruption and consumption.
      The amount of resources dedicated to meat & dairy is disproportionate to the reward.

      Factor in de-beaking, veal, live pig boiling @ slaughter, vivisection, plucking live turkeys, burning live pigs with flamethrowers as a test, crash testing cars with live pigs, transporting sheep for 20-40 hours across Europe for slaughter in a lorry with little water or rest, killing rodents for fur and .. and .. and .. and

      If I don't speak out, who will?
      If I don't try and avoid contributing, who will?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:"it's natural" is not a defence by Samus · · Score: 2

      You're right a lot of that stuff is not right and should be protested. One thing that you might find interesting about the US is that there is a growing movement for more humane treatment of animals. Its sponsored by what seems to be the most unlikely corporation of them all, McDonalds. They now have specifications for the beginning to the end. Starting with raising the animals up to the end of the animal's life. It seems they figured out along with help from the animal rights people that the nicer an animal is treated the better it tastes. Now if a supplier doesn't want to follow these specs or fails an inspection they won't buy his food. And that is one customer that you don't want to loose. Also now that it is seen as so beneficial the other fast food places are jumping on the bandwagon. I wouldn't eat a lobster if I knew that it didn't die as soon as you put its head in the boiling water. I get disgusted at people who put them in tail first or shell them live. You're right thats cruel. However I have know problem eating an animal that has been ethically treated. Thanks for the good conversation. Its hard to find that here these days.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
  37. what is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sound of a million New Zealanders rejoicing?

  38. Does anyone else... by Iron+Monkey · · Score: 1

    find it vaguely disturbing that this gene is named after Aphrodite, goddess of sexuality?

    --
    If my enemy's enemy is my friend, what happens if my enemy is his own worst enemy?
  39. Whither Mephesto? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    "I've created a sheep with *three* asses".

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  40. Hindquarters by Bunjo · · Score: 1

    This is silly, I've known for years that some sheep have bigger rectums than others.

  41. One sheep to another by cyberman11 · · Score: 1

    Do these genes make my butt look big?

    1. Re:One sheep to another by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      Hey, Freddy, start singing!!!

      Fat bottom girls, ewe make the rocking world go round....