Slashdot Mirror
Internet Gambling Law Resurfaces
hayek writes "The on again off again Internet gambling prohibition act is apparently on again [story from CNN]. The bill, which passed the house, apparently stops credit card companies from completing transactions with offshore casinos. Of course, since these debts are apparently unenforceable anyway, its unclear what the point of the law would be, other than to make clear that lowly college students wanting to gamble over the internet will need to find legal alternatives that are well regulated by U.S. authorities and safer."
How do you really plan on getting someone to give you money from an online casino? A large number of them are based in foreign countries, and there's not really any way to make them pay you. You can always try and open up a law suit against someone else in another country, but I don't think it would work too well.... nems
I wonder how much the lawyer got.
This bill would have to get through both the Senate and White House before it could become law. Rumor has it that both of 'em are preoccupied with higher priority government business just now, and all the elected officials are thinking about the November election most of the time anyway.
...
In GeekSpeak: looks like vaporware, smells like vaporware,
It's easy to make up & spread cool- and credible-sounding stuff. Finding & checking hard facts is hard work.
[/sarcasm]
It's not a moral objection to gambling (most of the states either have legalized casinos, legalized dog/horse racing, or state lotteries).
In the case of casinos and dog tracks, very few of those exist. In most cases, there are a fixed number of licenses, and the only way to start a new casino is to buy an existing one and demolish it.
In the case of state lotteries, they are quite obviously the worst method of gambling (from the perspective of how likely you are to come out with more money than you put in). In most states, a sales tax is charged on the ticket. Further, a portion of the remaining bet is deducted for "administrative expenses". And then 50% of the remainder is placed into the prize pool. If the odds of winning the lottery are 1 in 10, a winning $1 bet will pay about $4 (including the $1 bet being returned). This means that you have to be 2.5 times luckier than dumb luck to break even. That's an insane house advantage.
Contrast this with casino games, where the house advantage is significantly smaller, on the order of 5-10%. In sports betting (assuming standard Vegas payout rates, which you should be able to get from whatever bookie you choose; if the book don't offer Vegas payouts, take your money elsewhere), the vig is 4.5% (1/22), meaning that only being slightly better than randomly making bets will break even.
Basically, the only reason that sports betting is illegal in most states is because it would drive state lotteries out of business.
"...make clear that lowly college students wanting to gamble over the internet will need to find legal alternatives that are well regulated by U.S. authorities and safer."
You forgot to add "Taxable" to the list
There are, however, irrevocable internet currencies out there (I sell one, actually)
Imagine a digital rights management infrastructure that requires you to pay per view using a metal as currency. Not just any metal, a precious metal.
That's e-Palladium.
Will I retire or break 10K?