Slashdot Mirror


A Comet To Watch

Anonymous Coward writes "Ever since comet Hale-Bopp I have been waiting for a new, bright(as in visible to the naked eye), comet. It seems that my wait may have come to an end. Recently discovered comet C/2002 X5 can currently be seen by northern sky watchers through a telescope. It is predicted that it will brighten considerably (magnitude -3) in late January. Let's hope it lives up to expectations. Spaceweather.com has the whole story."

23 comments

  1. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appears to be /.'d. Here is a mirror.

  2. Really bright... but really close to the sun by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Magnitude -3 is pretty bright but not for an object closer to the magnitude -27 (or so) sun than Mercury. Mercury is already a challenge to observe because it can only be seen near the horizon just before sunrise or after sunset.

    I won't hold my breath for a Hale-Bopp competitor but it should be a good target for people with small telescopes or binoculars. Of course, comets are notoriously unpredictable....

    1. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just have to nit-pick. I've seen Mercury during the middle of the day on at least three occasions. Of course, having the Moon blot out the Sun helped somewhat.

    2. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by krenn · · Score: 1

      It gets worse, rumors are that with the latest orbits it will be southern hemisphere only from late January to early April. When it gets back to northern hemisphere visibility it'll be low near Orion (who sets just after sunset in April). It's orbit is awful close to the Sun. Seems like it might really start to dump gases and material on the way by and break up. If it does when it comes back to Northern Hemisphere it'll be a beaut. Only thing is it'll be a 1 shot phenomenon if that happens. If it doesn't break up and survives its close encounter of the hot kind then it'll be a binocular/telescope object in April...

    3. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      I just have to nit-pick. I've seen Mercury during the middle of the day on at least three occasions. Of course, having the Moon blot out the Sun helped somewhat.

      For those of us who don't have a convenient solar eclipse handy, Mercury is bloody difficult to see in the middle of the day. Happy?

      If you're willing to supply one sometime in early January, that would be delightful. I live near Detroit, so if you could aim the shadow there that would be best. Many thanks.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by Alsee · · Score: 2

      If you're willing to supply one sometime in early January, that would be delightful. I live near Detroit, so if you could aim the shadow there that would be best. Many thanks.

      I'm kinda swamped at the moment, January is no good for me. I haven't had a vacation in eons and I have ski resevations in Aspen that month. All work and no play, ya know?

      I can offer you May or November, but they'll have to be in Greenland / Antartica. Will those do? If not I'll have to put you on my waiting list. I'm penciling you in for August 21, 2017.

      P.S.
      I have a special project in the works, something spectacular! No one knows about it yet though. I want it to be a big surprise :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I live in northern Canada. Maybe you could arrange a more North-South track for that eclipse so it can hit both my area and Detroit? :)

    6. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Hi, I'm Alsee's secretary.

      I'm sorry, but he isn't taking requests from Canadians.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Really bright... but really close to the sun by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That looks REALLY suspicious. Although, Brazil is getting shafted too, so we aren't alone.

  3. Hale Bopp vs. others by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IANAAP, so I'm unqualified to offer unqualified blanket statements, but the likes of Hale Bopp will not be seen again during our lifetimes.

    That thing was not only visible with the naked eye, it was spectacular. The tail was clearly visible as a long spray of light, even without telescopes or binoculars.

    It was what a comet ought to be. Large against the sky, with streaming tail and glowing nucleus, and big enough that all these details can be made out with the naked eye.

    I saw Halley's comet last time it came through and I was very disappointed. It was too small, too far away, and too dim to make it out even with binoculars.

    If this next comet can rival Hale Bopp in its show, it will certainly be a treat.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Hale Bopp vs. others by EricWright · · Score: 2
      Bah! Hale-Bopp (1995) was not a singular event in it's spectacle. How quickly have we forgotten Comet Hyakutake (1996), which was brighter than Hale-Bopp; the "brightest comet in the past 20 (pre-1996) years."

    2. Re:Hale Bopp vs. others by EricWright · · Score: 2

      Oops... and how quickly I forget the year in parenthesis is the discovery year, not the "show-off" year. Anyway, the point remains, we had 2 spectacular cometary encounters in a span of 2 years (1996-7). It's not THAT rare...

    3. Re:Hale Bopp vs. others by sulli · · Score: 2

      Hyakutake was definitely the better of the two (and IIRC was visible first). I think Hale-Bopp is better remembered because of its more memorable name.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  4. Watch those retinas! by Trane+Francks · · Score: 2

    There's no doubt that a magnitude of -3 is bright enough to see with the naked eye, but the problem we'll have is the close proximity to the sun that the comet will have during its peak intensity. That will likely negate the ability to view it with the naked eye. SOHO C2 and, maybe, C3 images would be the best bets to observe this comet as it passes by the sun.

    --
    ...a FreeDOS contributor: http://www.freedos.org/
  5. watch out... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

    we don't want anymore people dressing up in purple wearing black nike's again... that wouldn't be good....

    --
    please me, have no regrets.
    1. Re:watch out... by Tower · · Score: 1

      Let them - it's natural selection at its finest...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    2. Re:watch out... by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      less competition in the web services business...

  6. Another article by Liquor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sky and Telescope also has an article on the comet.

    This article also points out the unfortunate fact that when the comet is at it's brightest, it will be directly on the opposite side of the sun, and impossible to observe from the Earth.

    --

    Liquor
    Sanity is a highly overrated commodity.
  7. Ok, here's your chance... by Hard_Code · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...if you missed the mothership when it came around last time...

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  8. Egads... by Dannon · · Score: 3, Funny

    A sign of that horrid song-stuck-in-the-head phenomenon.

    I looked at the story above, and suddenly a tune popped into my head. Y'all are going to kill my karma for this....

    Remember that Hanson song that was all over the radio some years ago. Only, not as 'Mmmm-Bop'. I'm hearing 'Hale-Bopp'.

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  9. You insensitive clods! by yoinkslap · · Score: 0

    while its all good seeing this kind of news on slashdot, its not all that useful for those of us in the southern hemisphere.

    could we have some news about celestial events that we can see?

    --
    Dont ask me...Im just the bass player.