Slashdot Mirror


Using DSL Modems for Point to Point Connections?

Tommydog asks: "Any techies out there? I'm living in a rural area and would like to know from anyone qualified, if I can hook up 2 DSL modems point to point, and connect to a neighbor's home network who is running Internet Sharing. We do have a dry pair (we can only get one pair) of TELCO wires between our houses, which are about 2 miles apart. Before investing in a couple of single pair modems (T-1's require 2 pair), I'd like to know if anyone has been able to make something like this work. It turns out that I'm just a bit too far for DSL, but this neighbor does have it and will share it if I can get a good connection going. So, anyone have 2 DSL modems working point to point, back to back? Are there any caveats or precautions? Thanks!"

57 comments

  1. Very quickly.. by NegativeK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are there any caveats or precautions?

    You may have already considered this, but most ISPs that I'm aware of have a line in the ToS that states that you may not share the connection with other people. And they do check; I remember a friend getting his house checked by Road Runner due to his daughter using P2P out the wazoo.

    --
    This statement is false.
    1. Re:Very quickly.. by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      Usually DSL providers don't give a damn what you do with your connection. It's the cable providers that will stick it to you because you accidentally turned on, say, apache.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    2. Re:Very quickly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the provider might check for someone sharing a connection. However, it's not too hard to do stealth NAT with a FreeBSD box. OTOH, it might be out of the question since he mentioned "Internet Connection Sharing" which I understand is some Windows 98 thing.

    3. Re:Very quickly.. by jone1941 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I just picked up a install kit from timewarner, and they asked me if I needed a hub? Apparently they are now starting to feel some pressure to support home lans, and so they are offering multiple IP's ($5 per extra ip) so you can just plug your modem into a hub and connect extra boxes. Or, you can just plug it into a router and take your chances that you won't get caught =)

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    4. Re:Very quickly.. by pyite · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "checked by Road Runner." They can't walk in your house and start looking.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  2. cut the cord...use high-powered wireless antennae by avi33 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's an article on I, Cringely that describes this exact scenario.

    However, he wanted to sit in a coffeeshop in town and use his home network, so he claims he installed a couple of high powered "pringle antennae" climbed tree, installed another one as a repeater in a tree somewhere (to get around a mountain) and he was in business. Shouldn't be too hard to line-of-sight something 2 miles.

  3. Ask Google before asking Slashdot. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010823. html

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Ask Google before asking Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the F&*$ up, i'm tired of hearing google whenever a question comes up. maybe him asking isnt only for his benefit but for the benifit of discussing another topic on slashdot. if you dont have anything useful to say that furthers the conversation on the topic then shut your hole you f---ing troll.

    2. Re:Ask Google before asking Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider that someone might ask a question on /. because A DISCUSSION WILL RESULT. It's -interactive-, unlike the results of your grand Google search.

  4. Yes by krow · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have done this before. The best I could ever get it to work was for 22K feet. The thing you need is two DSL modems that can speak together. Most of what is being sold today expects an expensive backend CO unit and a cheaper frontend modem.
    I suspect that if you want to do this cheaply you would be best off finding an ISP that experimented with "rolling its own" around 1998-99.

    --
    You can't grep a dead tree.
    1. Re:Yes by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Older SDSL modems should do the trick. I know that the SpeedStream 5250 not only works, but when used at both ends can totally autoconfigure a DSL bridge for ethernet at the highest speed your pair is capable of. The best part is that they're old and cheap. You can find them for $10 on eBay, so if you buy them and find out there's a problem with your loop, you're only out $20.

      I've seen these things work at 11,000 feet, and the manual for mine says it's possible to use for up to 18,000 feet (measured by line impedance). If you're 2 miles drive from your friend's house you could have 20k+ feet between the two of you, or worse, your line could go through the CO on the way there. If you're too far out for DSL from the CO, you're definatly too far from your friends house if your line makes a stop at the CO first!

    2. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ivan, I couldn't have said it better myself.

    3. Re:Yes by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Intrestingly enough, I'm 20,000 feet of wire from my CO, and still have 384/128 DSL from a local ISP. Something about pristine line quality (I did get 49k v.90 connections back when I used dial-up)

    4. Re:Yes by TBone · · Score: 1
      The best I could ever get it to work was for 22K feet
      Then what's the problem, he only needs to go 2 miles...a little more than 11K feet.
      --

      This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

    5. Re:Yes by krow · · Score: 1

      Short haul modems could be used but I never saw any that were faster then 9600 baud :)

      --
      You can't grep a dead tree.
    6. Re:Yes by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Also, the technology has improved in the 6 years since those modems I linked to came out. You can get DSL up to 28,000 feet with some of the newer equipment I've seen, but you can't do it with those old SpeedStreams.

    7. Re:Yes by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      I actualy have a SpeedStream 5260 "extended reach version"

  5. One caveat by splattertrousers · · Score: 1, Informative
    Are there any caveats or precautions?

    Sharing the connection is probably against the DSL provider's terms of service. Your friend might want to look into that before sharing the connection.

    1. Re:One caveat by Wonko42 · · Score: 1
      Sharing the connection is probably against the DSL provider's terms of service. Your friend might want to look into that before sharing the connection.

      I can't see how it would be. It's no different than sharing the connection between an upstairs computer and a downstairs computer. Most ISPs' policies have clauses prohibiting reselling their services, but they'd have a real hard time prohibiting freely sharing the bandwidth that the subscriber has paid for.

    2. Re:One caveat by CMiYC · · Score: 1

      It's no different than sharing the connection between an upstairs computer and a downstairs computer.

      Most ISPs do not allow the connection sharing within a home either.

    3. Re:One caveat by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's news to me. I've used five different ISPs over the last few years, through both work and home, both DSL and dialup, and none of them have prohibited the use of connection sharing at a single address. Each one did prohibit reselling bandwidth or providing secondary dialup service through my own account, however.

      Prohibiting an action that could take business away from the ISP is entirely logical, but prohibiting an action that has no effect on the ISP whatsoever is not. If I'm paying for a 768Kbps DSL line and I'm not reselling that bandwidth, the ISP should keep its nose out of my business. I'm paying for that bandwidth and what I use it for is up to me until it begins harming the ISP.

      I also have a real problem with ISPs that crack down on users who do lots of filesharing. Since I pay my ISP for 24 hour 768Kbps access, I expect to be able to utilize all the bandwidth I'm paying for (minus TCP overhead, of course) all the time. An ISP telling me I can't use all 768Kbps all the time because they haven't got the capacity is like the cable company telling me I can only watch HBO fifteen days out of the month. It's their job to have the capacity, since I'm paying them for it.

    4. Re:One caveat by jerde · · Score: 1

      Except that if you use your entire bandwidth 24/7, the ISP will probably try to move you to a more appropriate price level, maybe a "business" level account, or discontinue your service with their apologies -- entirely in their rights. They like being able to offer such high bandwidth on an intermittent basis, but they cannot sustain constant high-use.

      Of course ISPs oversell their bandwidth. Do the math!

      The telephone companies oversell their capacity, as do all public utilities.

      Some ISPs are a little more forthcoming of their exact expectations for "fair use", and do advanced rate-shaping so that you'd get 1Mbps for three hours, but then only 250kbps after that, or something.

      Mighty hard for them to stay in business if they don't. Getting big pipes is still expensive! I'm actually surprised how much bandwidth costs have NOT fallen, given how much dark fiber there is.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    5. Re:One caveat by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      It's no different than sharing the connection between an upstairs computer and a downstairs computer.

      Many ISPs prohibit even that under the standard contract. Sure, they don't enforce it, but that doesn't mean they couldn't.

      Most ISPs' policies have clauses prohibiting reselling their services, but they'd have a real hard time prohibiting freely sharing the bandwidth that the subscriber has paid for.

      The cable companies have no problems doing it. Just use a term such as "single dwelling."

  6. danger will robinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    most telcos are clued into the 'dry pair' (whatever you wish to call it) orders, and will deny them.

    a tech for sbc (who i have no reason to believe was lying - we were speaking friendly at a resteraunt) told me that they screw with service on local lines and can cause techs to get electrocuted because the lines aren't flagged.

    1. Re:danger will robinson by crazymennonite · · Score: 1

      I got zapped working on a 66 block last month. Stings and tinglews, but I'm not dead....yet....

  7. speakeasy.net allows connection sharing by Splork · · Score: 1

    Speakeasy does allow connection sharing. The DSL line owner is responsible for all activity that occurs on the line naturally.

    1. Re:speakeasy.net allows connection sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about activity that occures on the line unnaturally? How about supernaturally? Slimer does like his porn.

  8. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can not send enough power to electrocute someone over a low guage phone pair. get real.

  9. This will sound insane. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But assuming that you own the property in between...

    Have you considered putting in a fiber link? On ebay, I just saw a 9k ft spool for ~$200 buyitnow awhile back. $30 for some 10baseT transcievers at each end. Renting a trencher for a weekend would cost what? Hell, it might be alot of work, but in 2 years when you decide you want a 100baseT link, or even gigabit, you buy some more (by then) cheap transcievers. For that matter, you might even be able to find the equipment to multiplex cable tv over the damn thing, if you wanted.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:This will sound insane. by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1

      Posts like this are why I keep reading Slashdot. The original dude's question was rather interesting, but this suggestion is even more so. I didn't even know you could do something like this! There may be a lot of trolls or MS-bashing or whatever, but when you boil it down, Slashdot has tons of geeks who know and have tried some pretty cool things.

      Thanks, Slashdot, and my fellow geeks! Keep up the good work!

      Doug

    2. Re:This will sound insane. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I'm not completely sure that it could be done.

      For one thing, both parties have to own all the land in between, how likely is that?

      I have no idea how much shipping would be, for a spool that big... it might double the price easily (which would still be reasonable, imo). But, if I understand things correctly, this stuff has the equivalent of conduit attached, so that's not an expense. You'd also need to hire someone to polish the ends, and put some connectors on it... but maybe someone with the tools wouldn't mind earning an extra $100 on the weekend, for what would only be 20 minutes worth of work. Alot of work, and even a fairly large chunk of cash, but it would last decades. Re-usable in ways that we probably can't even imagine at this point.

      I'd certainly be considering it, if I were him.

    3. Re:This will sound insane. by falsification · · Score: 1

      For safety reasons, no one should install fiber optic cable unless they have the right training and equipment.

  10. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by erpbridge · · Score: 3, Insightful
    you can not send enough power to electrocute someone over a low guage phone pair

    Maybe not enough power to electrocute someone, but there is enough power on a phone line to cause a tingle (especially if you touch the bare copper while a ring is sent through). Thing is, dry pairs aren't the only ones that can do that... all lines can do that.

  11. ummmm...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're thinking of running a phone line from your neighbor's house to your house....

    Why don't you just use plain ethernet? 100 feet is the maximum cable length, but if your neighbor is next door, it's definately the easiest way.

    1. Re:ummmm...... by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the article, he's 2 miles away. Ethernet doesn't do 2 miles.

      Also, you're wrong about 100 feet being the max length of ethernet. It does 100 meters using UTP (Unshielded Twisted Pair), which is 300 feet.

    2. Re:ummmm...... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      $ units
      1948 units, 71 prefixes, 28 functions

      You have: 100 meters
      You want: feet
      * 328.08399
      / 0.003048

  12. only one pair? by NevarMore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    keep poking your test leads into the can, you should find another dry pair for the Telco to, ahem, 'lease' to you.

    i dont suppose you have any sort of cable (ie co-axial) connection running down those poles do you? might be able to get a dry line there and convince an old BNC'd ethernet card to shove data down it.

    also remeasure your distance. is he two miles straight down the road or two miles across a field and thru the woods?

    looks around im sure ive seen some people using microwave, wi-fi, laser, and radio over those distances jsut in case your DSL doesnt go.

    yea im sure this post helped you a lot.

  13. link to older Slashdot discussion by falsification · · Score: 5, Informative
    This was usefully discussed a couple of years ago on Slashdot. Link.

    BTW, if your phone company won't take your order for a "dry pair," ask for an "alarm circuit."

    You should be able to just plug both of them in, configure your TCP/IP stacks to use the DSL "modem" as a gateway, and you're off to the races.

  14. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

    I think a ring is 90v AC. Don't remember the frequency, though, and I could be wrong, so don't quote me on that ;)

    --
    /usr/games/fortune
  15. Re:cut the cord...use high-powered wireless antenn by kels · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, neat trick, saves you from putting the wires in.

    But this guy already has the wires.

    Maybe it would be easier for him to use them.

    --
    "I believe that the cult of the particular brings only death - for it bases order on likeness." St.-Exupery
  16. Etherloop by Fallon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go to http://www.paradyne.com/ and check out their Etherloop 1020 modems. I'm not sure if they technically use DSL signaling, but they work GREAT. Up to 10 megabit and up to about 22,000 feet (I think) range. Bandwith drops as distance increases a bit, but it blows most DSL out of the water on range and bandwith.

    We are currently using them to phase out some ISDN lines. At $175 a pop (need 1 on each end) it's pretty economical. Currently "modem to modem", but we have some actual DSLAMS were going to be installing shortly.

    They will work on just a dry pair, or a pair with tone on it. The builtin POTS splitters work fine, even modem to modem. The only issues are getting access to the cabel plant... not that big a deal for "us" as we are on a military base and own the plant, but probaly dificult for normal telco lines.

    Their documentaion is kind of poor, but the products are great. You have to call them and track down a re-seller which is a pain, but worth it.

  17. possible for some DSL flavors, but not others by fist_187 · · Score: 4, Informative

    here's a quick guide to DSL:

    there are many types of DSL... ADSL, SDSL, HDSL, VDSL, SHDSL, etc. they are divided into 2 main groups: Symmetric and Asymmetric.

    the "symmetry" of a DSL modem refers to the way the frequency spectrum is divided up. above the voice spectrum, there is an upstream data spectrum followed by a downstream data spectrum. in Asymmetric DSL types, the upstream spectrum is much smaller than the downstream spectrum. in Symmetric, they are the same size.

    since ADSL modems have different size spectrums for upstream and downstream, they do not connect to each other.

    Symmetric modems, on the other hand, are more readily connectible to each other. but, most need to be configured so that one will act as the "central office" device, and the other will act as the "consumer premise" device.

    the other thing that needs to happen in order to connect symmetric devices is configuring the ATM settings properly. DSL devices use Asynchronous Transfer Mode to transfer data across the line (this has nothing to do with your local network). most devices use a PVC of 8/35; it doesnt matter which one you use, as long as they're both the same.

    so, your best bet would be to use two Symmetric modems with consoles that you have access to.

    --
    Somewhere on this page I have hidden my signature.
  18. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

    Amps?

    A static shock has a bajillion volts, but not much amperage.

    analogy:
    "Man, there was this guy, in this massive water pipe! He could have gotten killed!"
    "Was there any water in this pipe?"
    "Well, a trickle on the bottom, but it was a HUGE PIPE!"

    --
    I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
  19. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    Amps?

    Enough to cause the muscles in my arms to rapidly contract. When I was a little kid, somewhere between 8 and 10, just getting into lower level electronics, I didn't know what the voltage was on a phone line, and so I was stripping live phone line wires with my teeth (my parents wouldn't buy me strippers) to run a cable to my modem, and the phone rang. Yow!

  20. Depends on your equipment by schon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want the consumer-grade stuff (the 3com or dlink RTUs that you buy to hook up to your telco's network), then no. They need a DSLAM.

    If you want to spend a few bucks ($1000 per end), Adtran makes some good HDSL gear - such as the Express-L768, and Express-L1.5, that will do what you want. The L-768 is probably what you want, as it uses a single pair, and runs 768K bidirectional. (The 1.5 runs at 1.5M, but uses 2 pairs.. it can also run 768K on a single pair.)

    We use these at a number of sites, and they work pretty well.

    There are caveats.. the maximum distance you can drive them is 18000 feet.. and if you're leasing copper from the telco, you have to watch the distance.. the telco here bills length as crow-flies distance, so unless you know their distribution network, you may not know the exact footage.. for example, we have two schools that are about 3 feet away from each other (next door), but the actual cable distance was over 20000 Feet. (The copper for each site runs back to the telco's distribution point.)

    If you own the land between the sites, I'd do as another poster suggested, and run fiber)

  21. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by erpbridge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Poor kid, parents wouldn't buy him strippers.... Then again, what parent ever does buy their kid strippers?

    If my parents had bought me strippers...
    Yow! ;)

  22. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by Alrescha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "you can not send enough power to electrocute someone over a low guage phone pair. get real."

    You should get real. It requires very little 'power' to disrupt the heart. The resistance of the skin is what usually keeps this from happening. If you have bare dry hands, you're probably right - but:

    The C.O. will send enough voltage to make an old-style mechanical ringer operate. It's a constant-current source (ie: it will raise the voltage until the appropriate current flows). With no phone on the line, you'll get maximum voltage as the C.O. attempts to make the electrons flow.

    Again, the resistance of your skin is the deciding factor. Get your hands wet, or let the wires pierce your skin at the same time the C.O. decides to ring your phone and could could easily become dead (remember to hold one wire in each hand if this is your goal).

    As a reference (current in *milliamps*):

    Unsafe current values:

    8 mA to 15 mA
    Painful shock; individual can let go at will since muscular control is not lost.

    15 mA to 20 mA
    Painful shock; control of adjacent muscles lost; victim can not let go.

    50 mA to 100 mA
    Ventricular fibrillation - a heart condition that can result in death - is possible.

    100 mA to 200 mA
    Ventricular fibrillation occurs.

    200 mA and over
    Servere burns, severe muscular contractions - so severe that chest muscles clamp the heart and stop it for the duration of the shock. (This prevents ventricular fibrillation).

    http://www.elec-toolbox.com/Safety/safety.htm

    A.

    --
    ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
  23. We have 4 of these... by RobbieW · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own a very small ISP in rural North Carolina. We started it mainly to allow us to have broadband in our programming office.

    Until about a year ago, Sprint would allow us to order these point-to-point dry pairs. Since we didn't have any other type of broadband (except Sprint's "reasonably priced" frame-relay circuits ~$700 for a fracT1) we used these circuits with PairGain 300S sDSL modems. These are manually adjustable from 128kbps up to 2048kbps depending on the distance and quality of the lines. They work very well. We were able to use them with circuits approximately 2-3 miles long at speeds of 384kbps and in one case the line quality was good enough to support 768kbps.

    There is a huge difference between a modem and 384kbps circuit. I highly recommend them.

    That being said, these modems are very expensive. I haven't priced them in several years but they were about $900 for a pair a couple years ago.

  24. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by lindsayt · · Score: 1

    Phone service runs at 90V 60Hz A/C here in the US.

    The amperage is enough to ring your phones - there's no circuit breakers inside the customer's house, so they'll suck as much current as they need. The lack of a breaker is because it's really typically not needed for residential use - phone lines only have high voltage during the short burst of each ring. The rest of the time there's just low signal voltage and extreme low current.

    US electrical code requires 14GA cable for 15A and 12GA for 20A power, but phone service typically should never even reach 1A so 24GA cable is allowed - it's considered low-voltage even though it gets brief spikes of mid-voltage.

    BTW, the reason the phone company uses 90V power is that originally the US power grid was also 90V, so the phone company could use the same power generation equipment as the electrical companies. But house voltage has slowly crept up, first to 100, then 110, 115, and now finally 120. I've even seen some places in the US that use 125. THe phone company sticks with 90 anyway.

    --
    I did not design this game/I did not name the stakes/I just happen to like apples/And I am not afraid of snakes-AniD
  25. Check Out Zyxel DSL Modems by kzanol · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, anyone have 2 DSL modems working point to point, back to back? Are there any caveats or precautions?
    Check out the SDSL / GSDSL Devices from Zyxel; I'm using a lot of these in back-to back configurations covering distances in the range from ~ 300ft to 4 miles.
    I'm using two differnt models: the older Prestige 681 SDSL Modems/Routers and newer Prestige 782R G.SHDSL Routers.
    Both have a max. linespeed of ~2Mbits; what you actually can get depends both on line quality and distance. Under identical conditions, the newer 782R will get about 20-30% higher troughput.
    From my experience I'd expect to get about 1 - 1.5 Mbits over a 2 mile link if it's reasonable quality.
    There's probably lots of other devices that would also work, it's just that I've successfully used these myself. Prices (new) in Europe are about $480 each; with a bit of luck you should be able to get them used for a lot less.

    --
    you have moved your mouse, please reboot to make this change take effect
  26. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by hplasm · · Score: 1

    There's enough juice to make you fall off a phone pole or rip your arm up pulling it out of a rack full of Sharp Things. That's what the Telcos don't want.

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  27. Why hasn't anyone posted this url yet? by Judg3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    OdessaOffice.com
    This guy lives in rural washington, and had the same problem. This is his complete step-by-step how to on how he did it, including modem brands & models, problems he had while setting it up, how he overcame obstacles, etc. Very very good read and I would think it'd be your first stop for rolling your own.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  28. (Offtopic) by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    >> "I would describe the kuro5hin site as being a site for pompous geeks, while slashdot attracts the angry geeks."

    --That is pretty well accurate. I just added you to my friends list, bro. :)

    --I ended up taking the "corrosion" link off my website 'cuz I didn't want them getting any more hits off me. Elitist punks... They'd rather delete my article contributions than discuss why the idea presented might be wrong!

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  29. Re:danger will robinson - stupid by budgenator · · Score: 1

    I think 90v ac is minimum ring voltage, typical is usualy more like 100v, voltage on-hook is usualy about 48 volts(phone hung up) and drops to about 12V DC when 600 ohms of immpeadance is connected like when you pick up the phone.

    as for hooking up DSL modems to a dry pair, i've heard of it being done, just done know how. also the telco may have put a filter on the lines that'll keep dsl from working.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  30. Why not a Wireless Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit being retarded!

    For about $300 you can get enough wirless equipment to put in a link that will easily go 2 miles, well actualy it will go about 15 miles but that is besides the point.

    Anyways I would look at that or this link:
    http://www.odessaoffice.com/sdsl.htm

    Remember this though. You said in your post that you are to far out from the Telco to get DSL. Okay so how long would thee wire be? You said your friend is close enough to get it..this makes no sense.

    Typicaly when the telco runs a line they run it from the Customer Premise to the Telco to the other side of the Customer Premise. Then at the Telco they add what ever service, ie DSL T1 ISDN dialtone, the person is paying for.

    What you want is a dry copper pair, also known as a "alarm circuit".

    WHAT EVER YOU DO, dont tell them what you are doing. Tell them it is for a alarm to monitor your house or something like that.

  31. daisy chaining? by FAH+Q+AUSS+HOLES · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible to 'daisy chain' the DSL modems to go many miles while maintaining excellent throughput? For example, if the distance causes the bandwitdh to halve, then why not buy 2 extra modems and throw them in the middle as a repeater?

  32. caveat: telco support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company I worked for did something like this for some point-to-point connections in Toronto, Canada using dry pairs from Bell Data.

    2 problems: we used units from Paradyne which had TREMENDOUS quality control problems - units were always physically dying (either the insert DSL card or the chassis itself).

    Secondly, check your SLA's. Bell Canada Data only guaranteed 9600 Baud end-to-end and had a clause that said they only responded within 48 hrs - which meant they took 48 hrs to call you back. Most of our non-Paradyne problems were cause by the line quality - we think at least a couple of our lines were in a conduit that had a leak - every time it rained heavily the circuit died. About a day after it stopped raining, the circuit came back, no intervention, no calls to Bell.

    So, yes, it can work, but use decent equipment and make sure your local telco will support you in a timely fashion.