Slashdot Mirror


Nanoscale Optical Fiber From Spider Silk

Makarand writes "Engineers may soon be able to make the finest optical fibers with some help from spiders. To make optical fibers narrower for nanoscale applications, researchers coated spider silk fibers with glassy material which was later removed by baking. The spider Stegodyphus pacificus, a native of the Middle East and South Asia, spins the thinnest known silk which promises to yield optical fibers with a diameter of around two nanometres!"

27 comments

  1. Punny by clambake · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can't wait for these to get integrated into teh world wide web... badoom-bing!

    1. Re:Punny by mbstone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Trademark lawyers will note this as the day the term "World Wide Web" became merely descriptive.

  2. Sticky situation by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    Imagine running and sorting that fiber out. Oop, broke it!

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  3. It's about time... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally, a bug that's beneficial to computers!

    --
    Ron Paul 2012
  4. The silk is removed, not the glassy coating by Simon+Field · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The post made it sound like the glassy coating was being removed.

    The light then travels in the air filled core, not in the glass.

    The use in scanning near-field microscopes is interesting, but don't we already have versions of those that use nono-sized particles that emit light (fluoresce), instead of the types that use fiber optics as the light source?

  5. Exploitation? by j-turkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean the vegans will boycott silk fiber-optic communications?

    --Turkey
    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Exploitation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone cares what vegans think?

  6. Hollow tubes by nebbian · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note that the operative word here is "Hollow". This ain't your grandfathers optical fibre!

    Most optical fibres for communications are solid, that is they work by total internal reflection, where the light bounces off the outer wall of the cylinder (in modern fibres this isn't quite the case, they put different refractive indexes of glass around the outside to 'bend' the light but that's splitting hairs).
    The hollow tubes in the article are weird beasts, allowing rather strange things to happen with less than full wavelengths of light -- they're not usually used for communications.

    The samples that they made here are only about a centimetre long as well, and I don't think you could make really long tubes because you have to get the baked spider silk out of the tube when you're done! Imagine trying that with a 1 km-long length!

  7. Re:Grr... by nebbian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, it's not like the english invented the language you use or anything ;-)

    Oh hang on, are you complaining that you're not used to the standard way of spelling 'metre' (ie. you think it should be spelled 'meter' which to everyone else means a little dial that displays some information) or are you not used to the standard metric system itself?

    OK, here goes:

    NOTE FOR ALL USA CITIZENS: Replace all instances of the word "nanometre" with "1/25188917" inches. There! Much easier to read!

    Friggin foreigners.

  8. Have these fibres been tested? by spotted_dolphin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The theory behind producing these fibres seem valid, but is there any evidence that these fibres are able to propogate light rays? My concern is that natural organic fibres do not have a perfectly smooth surface which the silicate solution will adhere to, contrary to synthetically produced fibres. Do imperfections on the inner surface of the tubule affect how light will travel? Or does this not matter?

    1. Re:Have these fibres been tested? by dunedan · · Score: 1

      My genneral experience is that nature is a lot better at making perfectly smooth surfaces than we are. :)

    2. Re:Have these fibres been tested? by C21 · · Score: 1

      take a baby's bum, for instance.

      --
      this is not a sig.
  9. use in CPUs? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So would this make optical interconnects in CPUs practical?

    1. Re:use in CPUs? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      It might but it'd still be a damned stupid idea.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:use in CPUs? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Why is that?

    3. Re:use in CPUs? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      In laymens terms, "cpus work on electricity not light." Basically, the electricity in the gate causes the gate to open or close... delivering light to the gate wouldn't *do* anything :)

      However, I understand there are applications for this in chip to chip communications.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:use in CPUs? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Well, I rather meant that new CPUs that _use_ light instead of electricity could perhaps now be made practical.

  10. Re:Grr... by twiztidlojik · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ahem.

    The parent's parent was a joke.
    Sorry if I pissed off you foreigners with no sense of sarcasm.

    That being said, I am, in fact, an inbred West Virginian. I drive my fat ass to work everyday in an (SUV|pickup truck) with a gun rack. I eat five pounds of lard everyday. I am also stupid and arrogant.

    This, too, was sarcasm. Thank you.

    --
    I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
  11. why not... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    ...just feed glass to the spider goats?

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  12. Re:Grr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am, in fact, an inbred West Virginian. I drive my fat ass to work everyday in an (SUV|pickup truck) with a gun rack. I eat five pounds of lard everyday. I am also stupid and arrogant. This, too, was sarcasm.
    That's not what it looks like from here. Are you sure you're being 100% honest here?
  13. Re:Grr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid natives.

  14. Diameter discrepency by 200_success · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article may say that the diameter is 2 nm. But the diagram has the diameter labeled as 1 um. Which should we believe?

  15. Re:Grr... by K3lvin · · Score: 4, Funny

    >NOTE FOR ALL USA CITIZENS: Replace all instances of the word "nanometre" with "1/25188917" inches.

    OR 0,00000000004 olympic sized swimming pools!

  16. Re:Grr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked slashdot was a US company so you are still the foreigner. I was not aware of the the english spelling of metre. Now I do.

    PS spell it how every you like. It does not bother me.
    And as far as the english inventing english. English was not invented it has mutated, extended, and grown with out control for years. The potenal for flamewars is just too much so all I have to say is. Good day mate:)

  17. You are all missing the point! by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    These things come from the Middle East! And South Asia!

    It all makes sense now!!!

    This war isn't about liberty, or oil! Its about SPIDERS!

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.