Slashdot Mirror


Physical Hard-Disk Data Arrangements and Drive Failures?

Tadau asks: "Knowing not much of the low-level and molecular aspects of a hard drive platter, I'm wondering if it is possible to cause a weight change/imbalance on a hard drive platter by say writing solid 1's to approximately 1/2 of a side of the platter? If there is a weight change, then could that attribute to drive vibrations by an ever-so-slightly unbalanced platter, which may result in an eventual drive failure?"

46 comments

  1. April Fools! by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

    I mean, seriously, does a one weigh more than a zero?

    --
    ymmv
    1. Re:April Fools! by sporty · · Score: 1

      I forget, but doesn't an electron have no mass? :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:April Fools! by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 3, Funny

      heh ... no, an electron has mass. Photons have no mass. Nor do Photon torpedoes. They do all their damage by making the enemy assume they've been impatcted (bright lights and all that), and computer systems just assume they've been hit and fail. It's funny to watch the expressions on the faces of the remaining Klingons after they've been "hit" with a Photon torpedo, then just as they're about to get all pissed off, you hit them with an electron torpedo. Then the fun really starts!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    3. Re:April Fools! by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      It has mass:
      m_e = 9.1095e-31 kg = 0.55100 MeV/c^2

      --
      ^_^
    4. Re:April Fools! by sporty · · Score: 1

      serves me right for thinking i was a physisist. Back to .. what do I do again?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    5. Re:April Fools! by Webmonger · · Score: 1

      No. The ones and zeros are produced by differences in magnetic fields, but magnetic fields are not caused by electron imbalances-- they're caused by electron motion. For hard disks, this is the orbit of the electron around the nucleus of its atom. The alignment of electron orbits is what produces a 1 or zero, but no matter what, the electrons stay where they belong.

    6. Re:April Fools! by Orthanc_duo · · Score: 1

      Photons have mass. Gravity affects light therefore light has mass

  2. yet more fodder for the 4/1 trolls. by digitalmuse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    c'mon guys, can't you create an April Fools thread with a bit more credibility... If I see this same story in this month's GamePro I'm gonna want my money back. 'from the theoretical-weight-of-information dept.' sheesh! let's just give it away from the start. oh well, better luck next year.

    --
    "If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse
    1. Re:yet more fodder for the 4/1 trolls. by PD · · Score: 1

      It's nothing like the User Friendly shutdown joke:

      read it

    2. Re:yet more fodder for the 4/1 trolls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay for GamePro and yet yearn for more article credibility?

  3. I worked in the HDA industry by nytes · · Score: 4, Informative

    The answer is yes. If you write all 1's to one side of a drive, and all 0's to the other side, the drive will eventually fail.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    1. Re:I worked in the HDA industry by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Funny
      So, you worked in the HDA industry. I guess they fired you for not knowing shit, eh?

      Oh, wait, I see the problem: You have monkeys in your pants.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:I worked in the HDA industry by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      No... he's playing a practical joke.... It's 1/4 afterall...

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:I worked in the HDA industry by nytes · · Score: 1

      Oh. So I assume that you would like to argue against the fact that any HDA will fail eventually? :-D

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    4. Re:I worked in the HDA industry by nytes · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're pretty much correct - Hint: there are two kinds of hard drives: those that have failed and those that will fail.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    5. Re:I worked in the HDA industry by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Right around when the warrenty comes up too, huh?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    6. Re:I worked in the HDA industry by SiMac · · Score: 1

      Indeed, if you write all 1s to both sides, or all 0s to both sides, or any other data arrangement for that matter, the drive will eventually fail also.

  4. Simple answer by missing000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No.


    If you could however write all 1's to all the harddrives in the Southern Hemisphere it would likely cause a polarity shift on the earth however. (AF)

    1. Re:Simple answer by inteller · · Score: 1

      this would make for a hilarious virus! imagine the widespread panic!

  5. Holy Zeros, Batman!!! by Ocelot+Wreak · · Score: 1
    I think it's the hole in the "zero" that makes it weigh less than a "one." -wjc

    --
    "I figure you're here 'cause you need some whacko who's willing to stick his finger in the fan. So who are we helping?
  6. Thank you by n9hmg · · Score: 1

    For reminding me what day it is.

  7. Seriously here is a link by Y+Ddraig+Goch · · Score: 3, Informative

    to an online utility and an explanation of how it works Hard Drive Balancer

    --
    Meddle thou not in the affairs of Dragons, for thou art crunchy and with most anything.
    1. Re:Seriously here is a link by quintessent · · Score: 1

      Very funny link.

      I hope you enjoyed the grins, and if you were fooled into wanting to buy these, don't feel bad. You are in very good company . Save this site for the next April Fools day and see if you can find a victim or just a friend/co-worker with a good sense of humor.

  8. Ahhhhh, April 1st... by bitty · · Score: 1
    The day that Slashdot becomes utterly fucking useless.

    Come on, guys, most of these "joke" stories aren't even mildly amusing or convincing. They're just plain dumb. Put a little effort into it, will ya?

    1. Re:Ahhhhh, April 1st... by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      It's Sunday already? ;-)

    2. Re:Ahhhhh, April 1st... by mdaitc · · Score: 1

      yeah, monday, and no microsft bugs... this has to be a joke? or wait, is that tuesday?

  9. 1's more then 0's? by voot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all the hardrives were ones it would have the north and south poles more defined and the hard drive would cave in to itself.

  10. That' not the real danger by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    The real risk is that if you write all ones to the entire surface of the disk, you will effectively create a spinning monopole. This will cause your data to 'go back into time' and erase itself.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:That' not the real danger by Casca1 · · Score: 1

      Or even worse, further back, and the HDD will effectively place you back in Win3.x

  11. Can't happen on modern equipment by Dammital · · Score: 1

    RLL-encoding makes long strings of "ones" and "zeros" unlikely.

    Back in the old FM days (where there was a direct relationship between flux and data) you might have had a problem such as you describe, but remember that the disks rotated at much lower RPMs then.

    These days you don't have anything to worry about.

  12. Air by pmz · · Score: 1

    I'd be more worried about all those '1's standing up on that one half of the drive. This causes an aerodynamic drag imbalance that will induce harmonic vibration. Not only is the buzz annoying, I have heard from an aquaintance that the drive bearings will wear into an elliptical pattern causing all the cylinders on half the drive to be off-by-one. If the drive begins malfunctioning, tapping one side of the drive with a 20-oz. hammer will reset the bearing geometry.

  13. ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you write on the platter it will depend on what ink you use...

  14. Who's to say 1s are heavier? by lindsayt · · Score: 1

    You know, a 0 is bigger than a 1, so who's to say the 0s aren't heavier? Think of how many more atoms it must take to write that 0, not to mention the increased time...

    --
    I did not design this game/I did not name the stakes/I just happen to like apples/And I am not afraid of snakes-AniD
  15. It's not the bit state, it's the content by dacarr · · Score: 1
    As we all know, the more data on a drive, the heavier the unit. This was first demonstrated on the old "Maytag" style drives. The experiments demonstrated it wasn't so much the state of the bits, it was merely the data that increased the weight. Yes, a 1 bit can increase the weight of a single byte, but in the long run the effect is delta. You will *probably* have to worry when they start coming out with exobyte RAIDs, but who needs one of those?

    If you are really concerned, you will have to make sure the driver is going to write all data evenly to a drive. FAT, naturally, is a non-option due to its fragmentous nature, so perhaps anotehr file system that doesn't require frequent defragmentation - EXT2, EXT3, JFS, or (God Forbid) OS/2's HPFS.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  16. Reminds me of a Dilbert... by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Funny

    PHB: This laptop computer weighs too much. Do we have anything lighter?
    Wally: Why don't you just delete files to lower the weight on that one?
    PHB (curiously studying laptop): That's a thought.
    Wally: Technically, I only asked why not.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a Dilbert... by barzok · · Score: 1

      And to save electricity, use smaller fonts.

  17. Historically you're 100% right by shoppa · · Score: 4, Funny
    You are, of course, 100% right historically-speaking. Hard drives and tape drives used to use "NRZ" or "Non-Return-to-Zero" recording, where ones were recorded with a magnetic flux change and a zero without a flux change. The problem was actually much more severe with 7-track 556 BPI tape recordings, where the weight imbalance would cause the tape drive to actually jump up and down on the floor.

    Once a year, (traditionally, the first day in April) all disk and tape drives were rebalanced by redistibruting ones and zeroes. The "bit buckets" were also emptied on this hallowed day.

    This isn't a problem anymore because all modern recording media use "MFM", "RLL", or "GCR" encoding methods, where ones and zeroes are automatically balanced.

    One minor technical nit: "ones" actually weigh less than "zeroes". This led to the conclusion that the more data you put on your punched cards, the less they cost to mail :-)

  18. Depends by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    On what file system your using. Modern file systems (like ReiserFS and ext3) take this into account and distribute the data accordingly using complex algorythms I don't pretend to understand. It's worth noting that fat16/32 don't have this problem either due to drive fragmentation. So if you use either of those two you're safe as long as you don't run a disk defrag tool.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. 1's weigh less than 0's by BobGregg · · Score: 1

    Actually, because data is stored as 2's complement, the so-called "1" is actually a *negative* 1, causing it to actually levitate. This helps reduce friction on the disk, ultimately leading to fewer disk failures. Ahh, the wonders of modern science.

  20. And a third kind ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... those that are never turned on.

    1. Re:And a third kind ... by Yarn · · Score: 1

      They are among those which will fail. Or have already failed. Like schrodinger's cat the act of determination could cause the failure.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  21. Bipolar Symmetry by robomatic · · Score: 1

    What an excellent question. Not many people are as perceptive as you. As a matter of fact it does make a difference, starting at the 80 gigabyte 7200 rpm range and it was part of the Microsoft suite of nanocode system support that had to be worked on starting with Windows 2000. It is an automatic system service to move data sectors with low zero counts automatically to maintain 'Odd-Set Symmetry' known as OSS in the Windows world. Macintosh has something similar, I believe it's known as 'Bipolar Symmetry' or BS.

    It is rumored that terrorists are working on various ways to defeat this part of the underlying system software, either by a worm or a simple user hoax that will lead to the disablement of high volume high speed drives. As larger and larger and faster and faster hard drives come to the market over the next couple years, you'll probably hear more about this iss.

    --
    It's always darkest just before it goes completely black.
  22. Yes, it is a joke. by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    And the story is apocryphal.

    But it goes something like this:

    In an early NASA launch project the engineers needed to know the exact weight of every component in the craft. The programmers swore that the software didn't weigh anything. The engineer in question finally slams down a bunch of punch cards in frustration and demands to know how much the software weighs.

    The programmer replies, "We only use the holes."

    1. Re:Yes, it is a joke. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Software, then, must have negative mass, because the punched cards lose mass with ever 1 "written" to it.

  23. Location by kamukwam · · Score: 1

    There are more applications for harddrives. By letting the heads flow freely on the harddisk and look at the data it sees, you can measure your acceleration.

  24. Here is the answer by shish · · Score: 1

    no -- the answer

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment