Slashdot Mirror


European Software Patents Vote Now June 30th

brenno writes "On June 30th the European Parliament will vote about the much feared software patents. Initially this vote was expected in September, but after a committee hearing British Labor Member of European Parliament Arlene McCarthy scheduled this topic to be dealt with next week. This leaves us with virtually no time to explain to parliament members about the dangers (read all about this at the FFII website). The only thing that you can do is to write to your member of parliament telling what you think and how it endangers free software and how odd it is that on one hand Europe was embracing open source and on the other hand they are putting it in danger. Please step in and undertake some action. Read all about it and write your representative."

38 comments

  1. Write a pointless letter that will be ignored... by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...or simpy wake up to the fact that democracy (as it is enacted in Europe and the USA) just doesn't work, the politicians have all been captured by special interests and no longer serve the people, and the only thing that will work is direct action, starting with massive civil disobedience.

  2. Re:Let's just get this out of the way.... by cabalamat2 · · Score: 1

    The EU != Britain, cretin.

  3. alternative to democracy? by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    What is your alternative to democracy?
    I still prefer it over a dictatorial regime.

    1. Re:alternative to democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better one?
      For example, one were we the people (in greek: demos) vote for this new law?
      Seeing that there is virtually no interest for the people in this law, but every interest for big companies, I call the current process rather dictatorial.
      Instead of suggesting that the only alternative to the current system is a dictatorship, you should working for the improvements all our democracies desperately need.
      Study Switzerlands system, for example. IMHO they are closest to what I'd call a true democracy. No wonder they refuse to get into the EU.

    2. Re:alternative to democracy? by ralphclark · · Score: 0

      What we have now is effectively dictatorial. What I want is an end to all dictators. What I want is a government that is accountable to its electors on a daily basis, government by electoral consensus: a system of government that can't be bought by big money. And an an end to all personal ambition in politics. There must be no hidden agendas for those we place in positions of responsibility. I am sick to death of having my cheese moved around by people over whom I have no control. Don't get me started.

    3. Re:alternative to democracy? by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1
      What we have now is effectively dictatorial.
      Perhaps, but sometimes unpopular laws has to be made. e.g. smoking is unhealthy, therefor it's banned in pubs.

      What I want is an end to all dictators.
      So do I.

      What I want is a government that is accountable to its electors on a daily basis,
      Do you really want that? If you do this, those who are elected (or want to be elected) will be even more concerned with how to please the voters. They will only do the things that the voters want, and perhaps e.g. a tax-increase may be needed for something.

      government by electoral consensus: a system of government that can't be bought by big money.
      Then the government must provide the political parties with the means to run their campaigns, etc. This is implemented in some countries.

      And an an end to all personal ambition in politics.
      Yeah right. No ambition means that none will want the job. A healthy ambition is a necessity.

      There must be no hidden agendas for those we place in positions of responsibility.
      Suppose a big comet is headed our way. We have many years to prepare, but announce it today and we have panic. Panic that could endanger our survival.

      I am sick to death of having my cheese moved around by people over whom I have no control.
      You have more control than most people. Go vote.

      Don't get me started.
      By all means do. It's a noble thing that you want to make the world a better place, but perhaps you should think it over ones more.

    4. Re:alternative to democracy? by ralphclark · · Score: 1
      I do always cast my vote whenever the time comes and I have on several occasions written to my parliamentary representatives about various issues. None of which ever makes a damn bit of difference because all they ever want to do is follow the party whip (local MPs and MEPs) or pursue their own nefarious agenda (eg. Arlene McCarthy). Written responses - when they even bother - tend to be either bland, misleading reassurances or else just a stiff re-statement of party policy.

      If you get clear support from someone it's only because they either belong to an ineffective opposition party desperate for support, or they are a powerless backbencher. The minute they get into power their concern for your problem tends to be overtaken by other things.

      So the idea that under the current system our representatives are responsible to us is not borne out in reality. They don't feel beholden to us at all. And when it gets near to election time and they need our vote, they rely on the gullibility of the majority to swallow their renewed false promises.

      Not only do I get very little good out of the current system, but in fact it's been very hostile to my interests on a number of fronts: the IR35 taxation regime hostile to small business; central governments' seizing of local authority town planning control so that they can enact their plans to build all over my local bit of the green belt; support for stupid IP laws; widespread videocamera surveillance; plans to introduce national ID cards etc. etc. you can bet that the last two things on this list are mostly intended to track dissidents and prevent public opposition from getting out of hand.

      I just don't have the time and resources to fight all of these issues by myself. The problem is that I don't have any effective representation in a political system that is serving someone else's interests i.e. their own and those of influential corporations and the very wealthy.

      Save me from ambitous politicians. The only ambition I want to see is the ambition to do what we tell them to. This is sadly lacking in the current system. There is a ridiculous notion circulating among the ruling political class in the UK that the people of this country want "leadership", "someone with the passion and conviction to take decisions and carry them out". Who the fuck told them that? The people do not want anything of the sort, they want to be in control of their own lives. And no more of this ludicrous "we have a mandate" nonsense. They lie to us about what they are going to do in their 4-5 years and then expect us to be happy while they then just do whatever they like?

      So as for your "they know better than us" attitude, I just disagree with that altogether. It's time we were allowed to grow up as a society.

      It dismayed me to find an attidude such as yours here on slashdot. I'm afraid your perpetuation of these myths about them acting in our best interests actually makes you very much part of the problem.

      --

      Naturally the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

      Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering (at the Nuremberg Trials after WWII)
    5. Re:alternative to democracy? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      How moronic does somebody have to be, to moderate the above comment "overrated"? Do we have chimpanzees for moderators now? Hamsters?

  4. Irish voters: MEP list by jmason · · Score: 1
    As I posted at my blog posting on the issue:

    If you are a European and bothered by software patents, now is the time to write to (or even email) MEPs asking them to oppose this directive; it's the 'proposed software patentability directive as amended by JURI' (COM(2002)92 2002/0047). The letter should support the FFII/Eurolinux and/or Green position.
    Irish voters: here's the list of Irish MEPs:
    • 1. Mrs AHERN, Nuala Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
    • 2. Mr ANDREWS, Niall Union for Europe of the Nations Group
    • 3. Mrs BANOTTI, Mary Elizabeth Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
    • 4. Mr COLLINS, Gerard Union for Europe of the Nations Group
    • 5. Mr COX, Pat Group of the European Liberal, Democrat and Reform Party
    • 6. Mr CROWLEY, Brian Union for Europe of the Nations Group
    • 7. Mr CUSHNAHAN, John Walls Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
    • 8. Mr DE ROSSA, Proinsias Group of the Party of European Socialists
    • 9. Mrs DOYLE, Avril Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
    • 10. Mr FITZSIMONS, James (Jim) Union for Europe of the Nations Group
    • 11. Mr HYLAND, Liam Union for Europe of the Nations Group
    • 12. Mr McCARTIN, John Joseph Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
    • 13. Mrs McKENNA, Patricia Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
    • 14. Mr O' NEACHTAIN, Sean Union for Europe of the Nations Group
    • 15. Mrs SCALLON, Dana Rosemary Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
    Please take the time to send them a letter, or even a mail. This really is a terrible proposal, and the last thing open source and small software developers need, is more software patents with an expanded range.

    1. Re:Irish voters: MEP list by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ireland has 2.5% of the votes on this issue. Not all MEPs turn up for votes like this, so if all the Irish MEPs turn up, their votes may make up a larger portion.

      It's very important to convince the other countries to contact their MEPs. The all-country page for MEP listings is:
      http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/ep5/owa/p_meps2.repar tition?ipid=0&ilg=EN&iorig=home&imsg=

      Ciaran O'Riordan

  5. Learn and do by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Europeans, please do something. Phone you MEPs on Monday (or leave a message today and phone again on Monday).

    Patents are going to ruin the software industry by handing even more power to the companies that have vast bank accounts and legal team (i.e. the ones that really don't need this extra power).

    Read about the affects of patents at:
    http://www.softwarepatents.co.uk/

    Read the UK patent office's "consultation on software patents":
    http://www.patent.gov.uk/about/consultations/concl usions.htm

    Examples of bad or missused software patents:
    http://www.base.com/software-patents/examples.html

    Bad EU patents that have already been issued:
    http://swpat.ffii.org/patents/samples/index.en.htm l#pag
    (these aren't really enforcable until software patents become clearly legal)

    A good proposed amendment:
    http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/epc52/index.en.html
    (tell you MEPs to look at this, we have to unite with a definite proposal. Simply saying "we don't want software patents" doesn't give an MEP much to say)

    Use the phone. Email is easily ignored. You'll often get answering machines so think of a short useful message to leave, mention the proposed amendment and tell them your sending them an email with the details.

    Ciaran O'Riordan

    1. Re:Learn and do by mickwd · · Score: 1

      A kuro5hin post of mine.

      Posting the link here, because it shows how those who want software patents are prepared to bend the facts to their advantage. If the case for software patents is so good, why would they need to twist facts like this ?

      Would this be of any use in trying to persuade some MEPs that some of those pushing for software patents are behaving in a rather underhand manner ?

  6. Re:Let's just get this out of the way.... by Loosewire · · Score: 1

    and the ones which focus entirely on the US - the internet isnt just the US you know..
    anyway the EU is more than just britain. you fool

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  7. A little help by Loosewire · · Score: 1

    Europarl
    of this list who do i write to all the parties? i dont remember electing any of them to represent me :_(....

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    1. Re:A little help by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Well, if you didn't vote for any of them in the EU parliamentary election, why not just contact the ones from the UK? After all, they are supposed to represent your member state.

    2. Re:A little help by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      Hi Loosewire,
      The coming vote is open to all MEPs so please contact as many as you can, preferably from your own country. Please also mail your local FreeSoftware/LUG/digital-freedom groups to encourage them to do some work on this one.

      Gathering info about this topic is pretty hard. swpat.ffii.org is the main website for info but it's a real chore to use. softwarepatents.co.uk is a good site but lacks a lot of the specifics.

      Most important is the counter proposal:
      http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/epc52/in dex.en.html
      (this proposes a clarification that dissallows software patents).

      An interesting page is:
      http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/ deman ds/index.en.html

      Good luck.
      Ciaran O'Riordan

    3. Re:A little help by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      one more thing:
      You probably didn't vote for these people, your government made that decision.

      The rules have since been changed though. In future, MEPs will be voted for by the people.

    4. Re:A little help by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Err, what!? There are public elections held in every EU member country every four years for the European Parliament seats.

  8. Re:Write a pointless letter that will be ignored.. by mickwd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I emailed my MEPs, and got three personal replies within a day.

    The first of those replies was within half an hour, and the MEP in question did actually know something about the issue.

    Your cynicism is misplaced, as far as the people I contacted were concerned. Those emails weren't wasted, as long as the representitives in question realise there is a HUGE number of people against software patents in Europe. But this won't happen if everyone just sits on their arses and does nothing, or goes and throws a brick through the nearest McDonalds window instead.

    There is one thing that matters more to politicians than money - votes.

    They really don't like doing unpopular things, or at least getting caught doing unpopular things - it loses them their jobs.

  9. hypocrites by delong · · Score: 1

    LOL! Where are all the "evil, stupid, fascist European" posts? Ahhh, yes, only AMERICA is "evil, stupid, fascist" and out to get us. Only America has stupid patent and copyright laws and (Londoners cover your ears and ignore those cameras on the street corners) violate percieved rights. Whatta joke. Bunch of lamers.

    Derek

    1. Re:hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, oh dear, one slightly confused Yank. I think history has shown we have had a profusion of fascists/etc in Europe. Perhaps our greater cultural experience is what makes us a little less naive than many English-speaking North Americans. We certainly don't have quite your flair for outright blatant corruption, though, and completely ignoring it even when it is right in your faces. Just look at the hard time we English are giving Blair over lying to us about Iraq.

      Probably the reason you don't see any "evil, stupid, fascist European" posts is because Europeans would answer "Yes, we know", instead of starting a flame war to defend their precious and fragile national identity ...

    2. Re:hypocrites by delong · · Score: 1

      Riiiight. Not quite the flair for blatant corruption. I'm sure Berlusconi and Chirac would just love to have you in court with them, you're a regular character star witness. Fact of the matter is, mate, European politicians are so blase corrupt and Europeans are so cynical, morally bankrupt, and jaded that you don't even expect any better. Unlike the US, where if such a level of official corruption were uncovered there would be plenty of grand juries and plenty of former politicians with a new taste for striped jumpsuits.

      The reason you don't see any "evil, stupid, fascist European" posts is because that level of vitriol is reserved solely for the United States. Or Israel.

      Nice of you to post anonymously though. No courage of your convictions. If only all of Europe could go around anonymously, the Continent might begin showing signs of having a sack.

      Derek

    3. Re:hypocrites by witte · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should take a closer look at the way your own country is run, before starting to fly off the handle on Europe's politicians being corrupt.

    4. Re:hypocrites by delong · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, the "you too" fallacy.

      Like I told the other guy, if any American politician were caught engaging in the kind of official corruption that is brushed off by European politicians, there would be a lynching. And if there was any dirt to be had, in our cut throat political arena, it would be public.

      If George Bush was found to have engaged in the kind of official corruption Jacque Chirac or Berlusconi have, and was found to be manipulating the legislature through his cronies in order to make himself immune from prosecution or the acts not criminal, as both Chirac and Berlusconi have, he would be impeached. Quick. All my associates in Europe have to say is, "Eh, what's the big deal? What do you expect of a powerful man?" The kind of shenanigans that happens in Europe's capitals does NOT happen on this side of the pond. Not without someone ending up in leg irons.

      Derek

    5. Re:hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kind of shenanigans that happens in Europe's capitals does NOT happen on this side of the pond. Not without someone ending up in leg irons.

      Example : what was going on in Florida last "election" ? I see alot of public intrest, true. Yet I do not see leg irons. Far from it.

      If George Bush was found to have engaged in the kind of official corruption Jacque Chirac or Berlusconi have, and was found to be manipulating the legislature through his cronies ...
      Pull your head out of your ass. The Bush administration IS doing the exact same thing. (Oh wait, maybe you already know this, but it would be *unpatriotic* for you to say so.)

      Dang it, so much for not flaming. Sorry.

      Again, you should take a closer look at the way your own country is run before throwing rocks at Europe.
      And I am not simply yelling "you too" here. I'm merely trying to point out the blind spot you seem to have for what's going on in your backyard.

      By the way, Europeans are not as indifferent to domestic politics as you seem to think. Do you really believe that in the long term people like Berlusconi will be able to pull this off without consequences ?

      ...I'm not sure what to think of all this really. I have no idea what skewed info has been disseminated through US media the last months, but this progressively arrogant and hostile attitude towards Europe (or the rest of the world for that matter) is really worrying me.

    6. Re:hypocrites by delong · · Score: 1
      Example : what was going on in Florida last "election" ? I see alot of public intrest, true. Yet I do not see leg irons. Far from it.

      It's called "voter tally that falls within the margin of error." There was no criminal wrongdoing involved. Like taking kickbacks, bribing judges, embezzlement, etc. Like the current Mayor of Paris cum Prez.

      Pull your head out of your ass. The Bush administration IS doing the exact same thing. (Oh wait, maybe you already know this, but it would be *unpatriotic* for you to say so.

      Oh really? Perhaps you could inform me of the criminal wrongdoing Bush has been charged with. Since of course European media is more "enlightened and objective" of course you'd have this information. Ahh, but you don't, because you have YOUR head up YOUR ass. Sorry thing is, you don't even know it. If President Bush was charged with official corruption and bribing judges to influence trials, and using his political party to ram legislation into law that allows Bush to jump judges that look like they'll actually be impartial... he could have a career in Europe. Like I said, that sort of thing doesn't happen on this side of the pond.

      ...I'm not sure what to think of all this really. I have no idea what skewed info has been disseminated through US media the last months, but this progressively arrogant and hostile attitude towards Europe (or the rest of the world for that matter) is really worrying me.

      Maybe it's because you guys fail to realize how much things have changed since the end of the Cold War, and especially since September 11th. Europe is no longer the strategic albatross around our necks, but you just can't get over yourselves.

      And I just love how it's always the fault of "American media." I read 12 papers from all over the world, every day, print and electronic, from the New York Times to the Times of India. What's your excuse? Ever think that the manic biased BBC could account for the descrepency in YOUR thinking? Shock the very thought!

      Derek

    7. Re:hypocrites by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Only a small remark: You seem to have forgotten Nixon in your list of corrupted presidents. Did he ran for presidency twice or am I dreaming here? Stop those arguments. Bot sides of the pond, politicians are all the same. With a difference that Bush exposes an unusually low level of intelligence (or impressive level of dumbness if you prefer it that way)

    8. Re:hypocrites by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Oyez! Oyez!

      The war between Europe and USA has just started with a nice demonstration of american blindness

      Derek, I am amazed how your reaction is typical of the average american I deal with everyday. Not a glimpse of education on the last century with that invincible feeling that you have saved the world and everybody is evil against you since September 11.

      Get other it
      You live in the usual paranoia that your governement feeds you daily with. That is sad

    9. Re:hypocrites by delong · · Score: 1

      Fallacy: Ad Hominem

      If you can't answer the charges, attack the person.

      If the person is American, their beliefs are founded upon ignorance and the propaganda of their government. But of course I have a college degree in Anthropology and Philosophy, and:

      And I just love how it's always the fault of "American media." I read 12 papers from all over the world, every day, print and electronic, from the New York Times to the Times of India. What's your excuse? Ever think that the manic biased BBC could account for the descrepency in YOUR thinking? Shock the very thought ...you have the reading comprehension of an unripe grapefruit. I'll repeat the question for you: what's your excuse?

      Derek

    10. Re:hypocrites by delong · · Score: 1

      Now it's the "all politicians are the same." In regards to a remark like this: We certainly don't have quite your flair for outright blatant corruption, though, and completely ignoring it even when it is right in your faces.

      All politicians are the same. Difference is, ours get thrown out of office, pronto: aka Nixon. Yours stay in office decades.

      And of course you'd have to attempt to impugn the intelligence of George Bush, a very tired and unintelligent remark by this date. Pretty stale considering he graduated from Yale and Harvard, and has managed to outwit his political opponents on both sides of the Atlantic thus far. What does that make them, vegetable intelligence?

      Derek

  10. Re:Write a pointless letter that will be ignored.. by ralphclark · · Score: 1
    The pols rely on our willingness to sit on our asses and take whatever is handed down. Mindless violence isn't the answer. Co-ordinated public demonstration *is*.

    Writing letters by itself has never made any difference. Pols are more afraid of party whips than they are of the odd disgruntled constituent.

    I know of only two instances where the govt. were forced to back down quickly over an issue without wasting everybody's time trying to cover their asses:

    1) The Poll Tax riots during the Thatcher era.
    2) The lorry driver's blockade of the petrol depots, widely and visibly supported by the public during the current New Labour govvernment.

    They almost backed down over the Iraq war but it dragged on too long and public opposition waned, which the government had been banking on (see temporary sig).

    It's clear from this that the only thing that does make a difference is positive action. Show your anger in the form of getting together on mass and picketing the House of Commons. Unfortunately this means that to get anything done you have to get the support of a *lot* of people. Issues that only affect (or are only of interest to) a small minority are doomed from the start and that's that.

    Government is like a giant steamroller. It has a huge amount of inertia and so to stop it you need to meet it with a huge amount of mass.

    These issues about the effectiveness of parliamentary democracy have come into focus now because of the complete absence of any effective opposition since the Tories were crushed.

    I advocate replacing the current system of party-controlled parliamentary democracy with a system of jury-style appointment, with relatively short terms and no chance of immediate re-appointment on expiry. No more professional politicians. And no more demagogues. People who seek power are usually least fit to wield it. And there must be less centralisation of power which must be devolved to a more local level, the more local the better.

    Government by direct consensus only. And there must be checks and balances to limit the incredible political power of the civil service

    --

    Naturally the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

    Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering (at the Nuremberg Trials after WWII)
  11. Thanks by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your reply.
    You reminded me of something I forgot.
    And btw, I most certainly don't think that politicians are always right, as I don't think the public is always right.
    If you can tell me where you got that quote, I will be grateful.

  12. You're Welcome by ralphclark · · Score: 1
    I don't remember where I got it originally but if you google for the final sentence (in double quotes, to force "phrase" mode) you will see a lot of sites carrying the same quotation.

    Here are some more that might be of interest:

    Law

    "No society can possibly be built on a denial of individual freedom." -- Mahatma Ghandi

    "Probably all laws are useless; for good men do not want laws at all, and bad men are made no better by them." -- Demonax - (Roman philosopher c. 150 A.D.)

    "More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca (42 BC)

    Democracy

    "Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." --Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

    "Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner." -- James Bovard, (1994)

    Politicans and Government

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken (1880-1956)

    "The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience." -- Albert Camus (1913-1960)

    "The enormous gap between what US leaders do in the world and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the dominant political mythology. " -- Michael Parenti (and it's just as true for the UK)

    "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." "The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." -- Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945

    "The technological capacities the government is acquiring and the removal of basic legal checks move us in a direction that was never possible 20 years ago. Does this bring us a lot closer to 1984? Absolutely." -- Tim Edgar, legislative counsel for the ACLU

    "Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program." -- Milton Friedman

    Outcomes

    "The search of the young today is more specific than the ancient search for the Holy Grail. The search of the youth today is for ways and means to make the machine - and the vast bureaucracy of the corporation state and of government that runs that machine - the servant of man . That is the revolution that is coming. It could be a revolution in the nature of an explosive political regeneration. It depends on how wise the Establishment is. If, with its stockpile of arms, it resolves to suppress the dissenters, America will face, I fear, an awful ordeal." -- William O. Douglas, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice (again, just as true of the UK).

    "When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny." --Thomas Jefferson

    Regarding ancient Athens: "In the end, more than freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all - security, comfort and freedom. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for most was freedom from responsibility then Athens ceased to be free and was never free again." -- Edward Gibbon

    I am grateful for Vincent Tijms' web site, from which I selected all the above quotations.

  13. European Software Comment Form by flagboy · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you are a European small business concerned about the effect of softwre patents on your business use the form at this URL
    http://freenetproject.org/eusp/index.php
    to express your concern. This form is maintained by Ian Clarke of Freenet Project. Comments submitted will be passed to MEPs.

    Alex Macfie <alex@cgce.net>

  14. Decision postponed until september by onnoz · · Score: 1

    I just heard this morning from Dutch MEP Erik Meijer that the voting about this issue will be postponed again until september. So we have some more time to react.

    For Dutch readers, here is an interesting discussion about the proposal for software patents:
    http://www.webwereld.nl/nieuws/15381.phtml

    A list of Dutch MEPs including most email addresses can be found here:
    http://www.vosoft.nl/parlementariers.html

  15. Re:Write a pointless letter that will be ignored.. by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

    Of course the politicans will vote wrong, when the industry tells them to, and you sit quiet and whine. Democracy works, but requires a lot of work. I guess many politicans think people want software patents. Lets tell them how it really is.

  16. Re:Write a pointless letter that will be ignored.. by ralphclark · · Score: 1

    Well no, they don't think that at all - since they have already received an enormous number of written representations and petition signatures demonstrating the opposite.

    Maybe you didn't hear, but the entire basis on which the officials sponsoring this leglsation have decided to completely ignore public opinion is, ludicrously, that a *financial majority*, i.e. big business *is* in favour, and so the public can just go fuck themselves.

    So I hardly think that further outraged letters will do any good at all. In fact given their apparently complete capture by special interests I don't think anything will work - except, maybe, getting round there in person with baseball bats, pitchforks etc. and "reminding" them of who they are supposed to be working for.