Locale Data Markup Language Version 1.0 Released
Ram Viswanadha writes "The Free Standards Group Open Internationalization Initiative (OpenI18N) announced the release of the locale data markup language specification (LDML), Version 1.0."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
We do need yet another XML based format ! :-)
Where's annotation?
Why do we put up with a crappy hierarchical database eXpansion and Mangling Language?
--Mike--
One thing that I'm not convinced of is that those locale merge two things: how data is displayed (number, data and currency display), but also how certain words a translated, yes, no, name of days etc... I would prefer to keep both things separated. I tend to use applications with an english localisation, but with number and dates in my locale (swiss french).
I suppose I could design my own locale, but I think translation should be handled in the application's localisation part. If not, you will get mixed results. I have seen to many dialog boxes asking
I find the idea of Europanto funny, but I would prefer avoid it in user-interfaces.This said, I fear the core problem is not so much the lack of standard, but the fact that application often have text and date behaviour hard-coded, or hard-linked to the localisation (like Apple's mail.app)
By the way, am I the only person that finds it ironic to see the following code in the header of the specification?
"Math-Esperanto Keyboard" for everybody? xDDD
open4free
it doesn't take much, just one line explaining what this language is would do.
Liberty.
And 1 character = 1 byte? Either that means a much larger byte, or codepages (yay, everyone loves codepages).
Does this mean monitor information is now reported correctly in profiler-dumps and via JPDA? That would be soooo great -- i'm waitng for that for 2 years now. Finding deadlocks using a trial-and-error aproach ist just a pain... Eclipse even has an extra "Threads/Monitors/Deadlocks" view, that just keeps telling me that my VM does not support that feature:(
Does anyone know more?
BTW: don't use the web-installer (window), it's slow. go for the offline version. And you don't need to fill the info form. There is a "continue download" link at the top.
I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.