Slashdot Mirror


Oldest European Human Jawbone Discovered

DrLudicrous writes "A research group working in Romania has dated an ancient human jawbone to 35+/-1 thousand years old. This is a few thousand years older than other jawbones found in Europe. What is unusual about this specimen is that it has rather large molars, something that the lead scientist thinks may be an indication of human-Neanderthal interbreeding. Modern DNA studies have indicated that there is little to no traces of this inbreeding, so this raises some interesting questions."

34 comments

  1. Oldest European Human Jawbone Discovered by daeley · · Score: 1

    I keep imagining this super-old Swiss dude waving an indignant fist at the scientists: "You bastards, I was using that!"

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Oldest European Human Jawbone Discovered by DrLudicrous · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiousity, what would this super-old Swiss dude be doing in Romania?

    2. Re:Oldest European Human Jawbone Discovered by daeley · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiousity, what would this super-old Swiss dude be doing in Romania?

      Not eating, that's for sure.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:Oldest European Human Jawbone Discovered by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      And furthermore, how would talk without a jaw...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  2. Multiregional vs. Out of Africa by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oldest according to the Out of Africa theory. The Multiregional theory claims that Neanderthals are part of the human race. (Check out the second linked pdf for a good paper on the DNA evidence: "Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution")

  3. More Info by poppen_fresh · · Score: 2, Informative

    The lead scientist is a professer at Washington University in St. Louis. There is more info at the university's web site. It turns out there was more than a jawbone found, but the rest of the bones haven't been analyzed yet.

  4. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They found my mother in law.
    All these years I thought I had gotten away with it.

    1. Re:Damn! by kwench · · Score: 1

      Yours??? I feared it was mine...

  5. other possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it was: a. a really smart neanderthal b. dumber than average human or they got lucky and found a mutant

  6. Large molars by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    I think it's great how they find this jawbone that has large molars and all of a sudden that means that there was inter-species reproduction and all the current crackpot theories have to be thrown out the window for a new crackpot theory...

    Sometimes scientists infer and speculate way too much based on the data they have. It's kind of getting stretched so far it's starting not to resemble science at all.

    1. Re:Large molars by Smallpond · · Score: 1


      From your post, I can tell that your parents frequently beat you as a child, and that your neuroses have grown to your current distrust of scientific authority.

    2. Re: Large molars by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful


      > I think it's great how they find this jawbone that has large molars and all of a sudden that means that there was inter-species reproduction and all the current crackpot theories have to be thrown out the window for a new crackpot theory...

      More charitably, these guys have offered some new evidence and an agument, and over the next few months or years we'll find out whether the relevant experts find the argument convincing.

      > Sometimes scientists infer and speculate way too much based on the data they have. It's kind of getting stretched so far it's starting not to resemble science at all.

      Cut the experts a little slack, OK? Think of something you're good at, and consider whether a cloobie's opinion about that something is worth a damn.

      One suspects that the experts can see a lot more evidence in a tooth than the rest of us can. Undoubtedly my clean and carefully documented programs look like hocus-pocus to those uninitiated into the geek mysteries too, but it's not for the uninitiated to tell me I don't know what I'm doing.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Large molars by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if you think it's so great why you bitch about it?

      you do realise that you can have multiple theories about one issue and can evaluate all of them individually and as a whole and it is more probable that this leads to better understanding than just having 'one true theory' at a given time?

      besides, i'm pretty sure you wouldn't notice science if it struck you in the head with a bsod of holyness.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Old European Jawbone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /me jawbone drops in shock.

  8. Wouldn't that be Neanderthal/Cro Magnon inbreeding by sideshow · · Score: 1

    I thought that Cro Magnons (sp) were still pre Homo Sapian.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  9. inbreeding != interbreeding by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Re the Slashdot summary text: the terms 'Inbreeding' and 'interbreeding' do not mean the same thing. In fact, they are close to opposites.

    You could call me a nit-picker, but you wouldn't be quite correct :-)

  10. Yah, Neandertals have been classed human for ages by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...and lots of evidence of interbreeding has already been, heh, dug up. Neandertals also have larger brains than us on average, so which way did the development arrow point? (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  11. 35 thousand years old? by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    but i thought the reverend whoziwhatsis said the earth was only 10 thousand years old? doesn't this show that anthropologists are really anti-religion? they're essentially like hitler. they must be stopped. lobby bush to bomb nazi anthropology departments across the country!

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  12. Re:Yah, Neandertals have been classed human for ag by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    What evidence has been found that Neanderthals bred with humans? None that I know of. The genetic record, and current thinking, suggests that no modern humans have a Neanderthal genetic legacy. If early Homo sapiens sapiens did mate with Neanderthals, offspring were probably infertile. The last common ancestor of Neanderthals and us seems to be ~ 500,000 years ago (4 * the estimated common human ancestor).

  13. Re: Neandertals have been classed human for ages by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Try here, here, here and here, and next time don't be so dang' lazy.

    Yes, I know there are also articles claiming that sapiens and neandertalis didn't interbreed, people seem to need them every few years to reassure themselves that all of those hybrid skeletons are just phantasms. The last page above references several articles which address this very issue.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  14. Inter-species breeding by Starmaven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In high school, we learned that different species are considered separate when they can no longer interbreed, with a few exceptions, i.e. horse + donkey = mule (though, mules are sterile). Ergo, if Cro-Magnon men could interbreed with Neanderthals, then Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon men are of the same species. Ergo, there would be evidence that the Multiregional theory is correct. That's what all the "missing link" fuss was about.

    --

    -StarMaven

    1. Re:Inter-species breeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post was making me horny, baby.

    2. Re:Inter-species breeding by the+phantom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just about right.

      In the animal kingdom, two creatures are the same species if they can (and do) interbreed and produce viable offspring (i.e. offspring that can also reproduce. Therefore, horses and donkeys don't violate that rule. Plants are another matter entirly, as such rules don't seem to apply (plants love to hybridize)...

      This can raise some interesting questions. For instance, are Bornean and Sumatran Orangutans of the same species? They certainly could produce viable offspring, but they are on seperate islands and cannot travel from one to another to mate. Therefore, it would be possible to conclude that they are distinct populations, incapable of interbreeding, and therefore seperate species.

      It is possible that a similar style of argument could be made for Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, however it seems more likely to me* that both were of one species, but different (probably interbreeding) populations.

      Also, this does not really make the argument for Multiregional Theory, one way or the other -- there is not enough data. Something that anthropologists tend to do is take a single skull and assume that it is representative of the population. As more samples are taken (more skulls are found), the data becomes more reliable, but a single skull should not be used to descibe a population. It is not statistically sound.



      * Yes, I do know what I am talking about. I am an archaeologist, and have studied different theories of human origin. While my opinion may not be of note to the academic community, I am certainly enough aware of modern theories to post here :)

  15. Re: Neandertals have been classed human for ages by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    In what way was I lazy? I suggest it is you who is lazy, in being dogmatic and refusing to accept the possibility of the majority scientific view being correct! Even the stories you link to admit the 'theory is controversial' and 'Most anthropologists seem to accept the conclusion of molecular evolutionists that the recently obtained sequences of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA prove that Neanderthals and Cromagnons did not interbreed'. Also, 'all those hybrid skeletons'? Only a single (possible) example is mentioned in the sources you point to.

    In any case, skeletal comparisons are rather subjective, and far inferior to DNA comparisons. In comparing mitochondrial DNA between Neanderthals and modern humans, no overlap has been found (e.g.).

    The single 'hybrid' skeleton may have been a distinct species, may have been an infertile cross, may have been genetically deformed, or may have been an early hybrid before the two species fully diverged. Before accepting the possibility that it is a true hybrid I would like to see genetic evidence that shows this is possible.

  16. mitochondrial DNA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really possible to extract DNA from something that old?

    1. Re:mitochondrial DNA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes; fragments at least. Lots of Neanderthal remains are close to the maximum age for DNA breakdown - something like 100k years IIRC. But it's perfectly possible if if you have some fairly well-preserved remains. It's been done several times.

  17. Neanderthal interbreeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey cool! I had always thought that Europeans had interbred with Neanderthals. I mean... just look at some of them!

  18. Neandertal by falsification · · Score: 1

    The right spelling and pronunciation is Neandertal. I thought everyone knew that by now.

    1. Re:Neandertal by DrLudicrous · · Score: 1

      Pronounciation, yes, spelling, not necessarily.

    2. Re:Neandertal by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
      The right spelling and pronunciation is "Neandertal". I thought everyone knew that by now.

      Bullsh*t: neandertal

      A real pedant would demand it be spelled and pronounced Homo neanderthalensis.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    3. Re:Neandertal by __past__ · · Score: 1
      The right spelling and pronunciation is "Neandertal".
      Bullsh*t
      Just more evidence for my theory that the german habit of frequently changing orthography rules is just meant to confuse the heck out of everybody, and then have fun watch the resulting flamewars. Basically, a giant trolling.
  19. Jawbone by Goronguer · · Score: 1

    Oh, jawbone, when did you first go wrong?
    Oh, jawbone, where is it you belong?

    </the Band>

    [What good is Karma if you can't burn some of it up once in a while?]

  20. huh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid people screwing stupid beings, no wonder their jaw was so big.

  21. Re:Wouldn't that be Neanderthal/Cro Magnon inbreed by DevilsEngine · · Score: 1

    Nope. Cromagnon is pure H. sapiens.

    They are us.