Slashdot Mirror


Synthesis of Anthropomorphic Molecules

An anonymous reader submits "Chemists at Rice have synthesized a set of 2nm tall molecules resembling humans. They make impressive use of a modular and composable assembly process involving torsos, lower bodies, and heads. Full article can (w/ protocols) be had here. Make your own NanoKid today!" The article itself is payware, but the pictures are not, and worth visiting.

23 comments

  1. I for one... by orkysoft · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one, welcome our new molecular overlords :-P

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:I for one... by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      they're only 2 mm tall.
      maybe we sould call them underlords instead.
      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    2. Re:I for one... by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      Ummm... it's 2 nm.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:I for one... by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

      You could take another couple of showers...

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  2. Small people by Omega037 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We are now one step closer to nanoporn!

    1. Re:Small people by damacer · · Score: 1

      From the pictures provided for the article, I'd say unless you're really into stick figure porn, I doubt nano porn will be too satisfying.

    2. Re:Small people by troemyd · · Score: 1

      As a stick figure, I find your comments offensive.

  3. More info? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

    Can someone who has a subscription to ACS post the "gist" of the article?
    That way, it can entice some of us to subscribe.

    Grump.
    (student with too much credit card debt...avoid using plastic when possible).

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:More info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      ACS Abstract... more coming shortly

      Described here are the synthetic details en route to an array of 2-nm-tall anthropomorphic molecules in monomeric, dimeric, and polymeric form. These anthropomorphic figures are called, as a class, NanoPutians. Using tools of chemical synthesis, the ultimate in designed miniaturization can be attained while preparing the most widely recognized structures: those that resemble humans.

    2. Re:More info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK... skimming the article, I had to grumble. It's really pretty gimmicky. It's a class of phenyl-pentyne derivatives.

      Once you make "NanoKid", you can "decapitate" the acetal that forms the "head" by microwave irradiation and pop on something else. So they made a "NanoAthlete", "NanoMonarch", "NanoPilgrim", "NanoGreenBeret", "NanoJester", "NanoTexan", ... Scholar, Baker, and Chef.

      They make a monolayer with "feet" from thiols and put them on a gold surface. Then they cook up some "hands" that can crosslink so they can make a monolayer that "holds hands."

      As I said, sorta a gimmick. Tour, et al. don't claim any sort of more interesting purpose than pushing the "erector set" sort of chemistry.

    3. Re:More info? by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is... these molecules will not get you high?

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  4. Award Candidate by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks like we've already got a nominee for 2004 Ig Nobel prize in chemistry or physics.

    --
    But then again, I could be wrong.
    1. Re:Award Candidate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ig Nobel prizes are actually for real science. This is just doodling.

  5. Wow! by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a pretty close likeness.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  6. NanoKids! by phch · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to a footnote in the article, "An education outreach program has been established based on 3-D animations of anthropomorphic figures called NanoKids. See: http://nanokids.rice.edu."

    I guess these color figures better illustrate what the authors had in mind.

    1. Re:NanoKids! by nhaze · · Score: 1

      taken from their mission statement "...The NanoKids(TM) educational outreach program, headed by Dr. James M. Tour, Chao Professor of Chemistry at Rice University, is dedicated to increasing public knowledge of the nanoscale world and the emerging molecular research and technology that is rapidly expanding internationally....".
      I seriously hope research was not done into the synthesis of anthropomorphic molecules just for this NanoKids project. Like these kids who know dick about chemistry are going to appreciate if their little computer generated cartoon guide/tutor is chemically stable and in realistically viable configuration.
      I have no problem with the NanoKids(TM) project as an education venture sponsored by NSF to help promote interest in chemistry and nano-scale, but please...don't stretch it.

  7. WTF! by nhaze · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah because this is useful in anyway... Let's throw some more tax dollars at the project and give them some pet dogs and hell why not a seamonkey.

    Granted this is a well known and respected research, but that does not give him the right to piss away your money.
    Here is a link with some more info

  8. Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found the article on google here it is.

  9. I hope... by TheClam · · Score: 1

    ...no one gets their Ph.D. from this work.

  10. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to agree with the parent's sentiment. Perhaps the moderator who marked this as a troll can enlighten us with how this is a useful scientific/engineering development and justify the cost to the tax payers. And thanks for the link, this is just plain disgusting.

  11. beware of the ants by phazei · · Score: 1

    they now have voodoo dolls small enough to get back at us for the magnifying glass...

  12. How about educating the youth of America? by DaleBob · · Score: 1

    Or is that not good enough a reason?

    This program is clearly part of the NanoKids project at Rice University which is intended to develop new ways to educate children about nanotechnology and chemistry. Kids get interested when they find out that you can play with molecules just like tinkertoys. There's a difference between telling a kid, "You know you could make a molecule shaped like a human being if you wanted" and actually doing it.

    Not to mention some poor organic chemistry student learned a hell of a lot about synthesis by making those molecules.