Slashdot Mirror


Ultimate Caller ID Screeners?

omasse asks: "I'm sick of telemarketing. Really sick. And since I'm in Canada, the new U.S. telemarketing law won't change a thing for me. The only easy solution is a technological one, and it ought to be fully transparent: No phone in my house should ring at all if it's an undesired call, and friends and family should not have to enter a 5-digit code to make them ring. To my knowledge, the only gadget that could do this is a sharp filter based on caller ID that I plug in my main phone drop. But Digitone's Caller ID Screener has been announced some time ago, there are no guarantees they'll meet their fall 2003 deadline, and I would prefer having a few products to chose from. There's been a discussion here once on a DIY home PBX system but that's way, way overkill for me. Could anyone tell me what are the ultimate Caller ID Screeners?"

57 comments

  1. Asterisk by tzanger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Asterisk can solve that for you. I am playing with it now. It can do different things based on the received CID and even do things like play the "disconnected line" tone sequence before passing the call to you if the CID is unknown.

    Just a word of advise: Don't use Quicknet's cards -- the cards work fine but the asterisk developers seem to have something against them, almost forcing you to use Digium's FXO/FXS cards instead. The PhoneJack/LineJacks will work fine for a little while and then you'll get weird problems like oddball rings, CID not being passed through, DTMF not being passed through, all kinds of little issues that you'll have to restart asterisk or reload the modules to fix. The standard answer on #asterisk is "Use Digium cards instead." Right.

    1. Re:Asterisk by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Asterisk can solve that for you.

      It certainly can. You can script any behavior you want in Perl.

      For instance, when someone calls me, it first checks for a supplied caller-ID (CID) number. If there is one, and it's not on my blacklist, the call rings through to the phone (otherwise I hear nothing).

      If they're on the blacklist, the call is picked up and immediately dropped.

      If there is no CID, it starts playing my "answering machine" message. During that time, they can touch-tone in a code which I have given various people who call from overseas or who for other reasons can't send CID. Otherwise, it just lets them leave a message and then disconnects them.

      I couldn't ask for anything more.

      The total cost was about $200 in hardware plus a lot of time tinkering. That's a lot of money but really I count the time spent tinkering as entertainment value (the fun of being a geek) so it's well worth it to me.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  2. Switch to mobile by Malfourmed · · Score: 1

    A lot of cell phones have include/exclude facilities built-in. A lot of people are eschewing their landlines altogether for their mobile equivalents.

    1. Re:Switch to mobile by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      When the power went out across the northeast, the cell towers conked out. How convenient.

    2. Re:Switch to mobile by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "When the power went out across the northeast, the cell towers conked out. How convenient."

      Ooo you're absolutely right. I'm going to get me a landline now in case the northeast blacks out like that again.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Switch to mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, I live in Cleveland, lost power, yet my cell worked the enitre time.... Assfuck

    4. Re:Switch to mobile by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      nice attempt at a troll.
      cleveland was not the only city with power.
      plus, I'm in canada

  3. Or... by FFFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...you could call up Information and harass them f or the 1-800 number for the Direct Marketing Association, or whatever they call themselves up here, and then get your name put on a do-not-call list.

    I did this going on eight years ago, and I've received fewer than a dozen telemarketing calls since. My postal junkmail also was reduced.

    There is a registry, it can just be a bitch to find out how to get on it. Shouldn't stop you from succeeding, though!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Or... by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...you could call up Information and harass them f or the 1-800 number for the Direct Marketing Association, or whatever they call themselves up here, and then get your name put on a do-not-call list.

      That's correct, however we already have legislation in effect that functions similar to the Do Not Call list. The CRTC, bless their hearts, some time ago drafted a regulation that states that upon request, a telemarketting firm must (I'll reiterate; MUST) remove your number from their call list within seven (7) days. If a telemarketer refuses or acts confused on the phone when you make the (simple) request, inform them that it is a CRTC regulation and if they're in doubt, you'll have the CRTC contact them and clarify the situation.

      No need to be rude, just a few words always worked for me. "Please remove my number from your list. Thank-you." Generally they apologized for my inconvenience and assured me it would be done. Within days my calls dropped in half, within a few weeks I forgot what a telemarketting call sounded like.

      Another tacts that always works well; "This is a cell phone." {click!}

      (It's also highly illegal to place telemarketting calls to cellular phones.)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  4. Telephone answering machine by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful
    CLI (caller line identification, commonly but, as I'll explain, completely inaccurately and deceptively described as "Caller ID") is an answer to the wrong question. You want to know WHO is calling. CLI tells you what the phone number of the person is who's calling, or, for the more expensive variants, what the name of the person associated with the phone is. Neither tells you who. And blocking the number is done for many legitimate reasons, not just by telemarketers.

    If you want to know WHO is calling, and be in a position to decide whether to pick up a call on the basis of the person calling, a telephone answering machine is the only option available. Record a message like "Hi, this is X, speak after the tone and if I'm in I'll pick up", and listen when the phone rings.

    It is the technological answer. Unfortunately, as it has no LCD screen and doesn't require subscription to an amazing service that beeps FSK tones in between rings, it's also the most crude looking, and thus the easiest to overlook. Unlike CLI, it works, it's 100% foolproof, there is never a false positive or false negative. You're not at the mercy of the networks interconnecting, or the policies of the person whose phone is being used to call you. And, FWIW, you protect the privacy of both you and the caller calling you.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Telephone answering machine by asimulator · · Score: 1

      Where are your moderator points when you need them?

      Moderators, mod the parent up.

    2. Re:Telephone answering machine by grips · · Score: 1

      We have left the original factory message without a name on our answering machine. No problem.

      --
      Knapp vorbei ist auch daneben.
  5. Try this: by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.the-cma.org/consumer/donotcall/dnc_serv ice.cfm

    Certainly not legally binding, nor as extensive as the US Do-Not-Call list. I think this is what an earlier poster was referring to (though I could be wrong).

    Alternately, just fake your death!

    --
    Dark Nexus
    "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
    1. Re:Try this: by Quikah · · Score: 2, Informative

      you beat me to it. There is a similar list for every country the Direct Marketing Association operates in (I think, hard to tell where I don't speak the language, but UK, Australia, Canada and US all have lists).

      You can find your country specific weblinks at http://www.the-dma.org/affiliates/dmintl.shtml.

      --
      Q.
  6. Calls from strange numbers by MarkusQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with blocking calls from strange numbers is that the times you really need the call to get through are often also the times you are calling from a strange number (e.g. a kind stranger's cell phone, since yours is somewhere under the rubble).

    -- MarkusQ

  7. CRTC fact sheet -- Typically Canadian... by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/INFO_SHT/T22.htm

    "Restrictions apply to all telemarketers, although they may differ depending on whether they use a fax or a telephone. As a minimum, telemarketers must maintain "Do not call/fax lists" and provide customers with a fax or telephone number where a responsible person can be reached. Specific rules are included at the end of this document."

    This is the best part:

    "What are the consequences if telemarketers don't follow the rules? Telephone companies can notify these telemarketers that telephone service to the lines used in connection with placing calls (telephone or fax) may be suspended or disconnected within two business days."

    um... phone company may cut off their most lucrative paying customers... sure... I'm sure their quivering in their boots now... Not only do you have to chase the buggers, then you have to pester the phone company, and then they just change the company name and keep going. Not even a fine.

    Canadians are so ... wimpy^H^H^H^H^H understanding and sympathetic.

  8. I could like telemarketers if I had... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

    ...a call screener which would let me route calls I know to be telemarketers into a pre-recorded message where I would talk nonstop for about 10 minutes attempting to sell them some product or service of my own.

  9. ANI CNID by sabNetwork · · Score: 1

    I don't know precisely how you would implement the system, but your ideal solution should involve ANI, not CallerID. Unlike CallerID, ANI works 100% of the time and there are no blocked numbers. To get ANI services, you need to have an ISDN line or something to that effect.

    Back when ISDN was the cream of the crop, I used to have a dual-line ISDN connection with a WebRamp router. The router would report the ANI information for incoming calls on its status page. Neat stuff.

  10. Number of Rings by jonadab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All you really want is to program your phone to ring silently the
    first N rings, and _then_ start ringing on the N+1th ring. The
    right value of N will effectively prevent telemarketers from ever
    reaching you, period, but anyone who knows you can be told, "Just
    let it ring about eight times", which is what anyone with a real
    and urgent need to reach you will do anyway.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    1. Re: Number of Rings by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > All you really want is to program your phone to ring silently the
      first N rings, and _then_ start ringing on the N+1th ring.


      I'd like to have an answering machine with a menu like most businesses do these days, but have it be a "honeypot" machine that would create fake submenus to an unbounded depth on the fly. Then you just tell your friends the secret code to enter at the first level to skip the runaround.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Number of Rings by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that would work. Telemarketing calls tend to be set up by auto-diallers; human callers are only assigned to the outgoing calls once they've connected. The auto-diallers will happily wait a long time for someone to pick up.

    3. Re:Number of Rings by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The auto-diallers will happily wait a long time for someone to
      > pick up.

      Do they? My experience suggests otherwise. (I'm one of those
      annoying people who doesn't even _notice_ the phone ringing for
      several rings, then gets to a stopping place with whatever I was
      doing, _then_ gets up and _walks_ to the phone... it can be the
      tenth ring before I pick up even normally. It often quits before
      I get there, but I haven't answered a telemarketer call in quite a
      few months. Members of my family who answer more promptly (when
      they are around to answer at all), however, get them daily.

      Maybe it's a coincidence, related to what times of day I'm the only
      one around to answer the phone? Or maybe the telemarketers who have
      our particular number are atypical? Dunno.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:Number of Rings by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not speaking from experience - I don't think I've ever received a telemarketing call at home, and both my phone numbers are now on the TPS register (the UK's do-not-call register). What I meant to say was that they can wait as long as they're programmed to.

  11. Umm, Right by Crazed+Gryphon · · Score: 1

    Despite FFFish comment about do not call lists, many organizations such as religious groups can still call you. Dont rely on do not call lists. Also, people are tallking about new laws that may make it so that there is noo longer any such thing as a do not call list.

  12. They've exsisted for several years now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're called "secretaries."

    1. Re:They've exsisted for several years now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no joke -- you can get an answering service and have a real person deal with your calls for not that much money.

    2. Re:They've exsisted for several years now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, secretaries are for fucking, not answering the phones! Get your wife to answer the damn thing!

  13. SCUD by Van+Halen · · Score: 2, Informative
    Perhaps SCUD will work for you. I've never used it, but a quick search in /usr/ports/comms turned it up.

    A few years ago I had a whole answering machine system running on my Linux box using this voice modem package and a heavily modified version of the included script. I rewrote the script in perl and modified to, among other things, answer unknown or private calls after the first ring. It was hacked together, but not half bad in the end.

    Then about 3 years ago I switched to FreeBSD and never quite got the voice modem control program working. I gave up and got privacy manager from the phone company, which does a fairly good job. Besides, the voice modem was ISA, in a machine that was getting pretty old. I probably still have all that stuff on some backup CD somewhere, but who knows exactly where...

    1. Re: SCUD by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > Perhaps SCUD will work for you.

      I considered that, but many telemarketers call from out of range.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  14. VoicePulse VoIP works here in the U.S. by Rescate · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use the features of voice-over-IP provider VoicePulse to accomplish what you are talking about. I know that you can't get VoicePulse in Canada, but maybe there are other VoIP providers there that I don't know about, who offer similar features. You sign up with them, and they send you a preconfigured Cisco ATA-186 to hook up to your broadband connection. You plug a telephone into the Cisco ATA to use it.

    You can then set up anonymous call blocking so that callers without caller ID don't get through. You can optionally set it up to allow anonymous callers if they enter their phone number after prompted, which then gets sent to your caller ID as ??1234567890?? to indicate that the call was originally anonymous.

    They also have "Telemarketer Block", which I assume is the same kind of thing the Telezapper does. I should probably turn it on, but I thought it might be annoying to callers.

    You can also use their Do Not Disturb feature in combination with their Filter feature to send most callers immediately to voice mail, but allow your family to ring through. You do this by activating the Do Not Disturb feature, and then setting a filter for each family member's telephone number with the filter action set to "Always Ring" (the filter overrides the Do Not Disturb).

    The filters are cool, you can set them up for individual callers with actions of "Always Forward", "Always Ring", "Always Voicemail", "Always Busy", or for the truly annoying, "Not In Service", which plays a "not in service" message. One final option they don't list in their promo materials, but appears on the Filter setup page when I am logged in to my account, is "Rejection Hotline". It supposedly plays a "humorous message provided by the Rejection Hotline." I haven't tried this option yet, so I don't know how lame it is, but I can guess...

  15. All I want... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    is a simple caller-ID display unit similar to the many cheap (~$AU15) models available, but which the user can program to associate the caller's name with the number. Does anybody know of a gadget like this? I haven't seen one on the market here in Australia. I don't imagine such a thing would be hard to produce...

    1. Re:All I want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some phones (like my Aastra Vista 150) will show the name if you have a number on speed dial. You could also use a modem for caller ID and get your computer to show each caller's name and number.

      But it's probably much easier just to pay your phone company for the name-display option. It would be a pain in the ass to have to buy a device for $15, then load all your phone numbers and names into it.

    2. Re:All I want... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      I have a program called NCID on my Linux box that allows this. It is client/server and works over the LAN. Cilents are my TiVo (OSD Caller ID, with name/number ailaising) and a client for my Matrix Orbital LCD using lcdproc.

  16. CID-Smart Answering Machine by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got an AT&T answering machine that can play different messages for different CID matches. The important feature is support for unique messages for blocked/unknown CID data - telemarketers always block this.

    So, you setup a message like "Hi... [pause to let the auto-transfer gidgit connect you to a drone] ... if this is a telemarketer, please put us on your do not call list, otherwise please leave a message." A friendlier message goes on the unblocked caller ID calls.

    This has reduced my calls to fewer than 1 per week. I think taking advantage of laws instead of technical quirks is the better strategy, more immune from arms races.

    Of course, I'm assuming Canada at least has per-company DNC list legislation.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:CID-Smart Answering Machine by pmz · · Score: 1

      ...taking advantage of laws instead of technical quirks is the better strategy, more immune from arms races.

      At least a small-time arms race doesn't run the risk of unintended consequenses, such as permanently removing rights that every person is entitled to. The markets are already telling telemarketers to piss off, the DNC list only makes it happen just a little sooner.

  17. Re:Try this: (CMA Do-Not-Contact list) by shaniber · · Score: 1

    I was about to mention this as well. considering the number of Telemarketers that refer me to this when I ask them to remove me, it seems like a reasonably well-respected list in Canada. Might just be something to do with our politeness and whatnot.

    as well, if you repeatedly get calls from marketters that you've requested not to call you (either by talking to them, or by getting on the list), you can report them to your local telephone company, and let them know about it.

    --
    mah na mah na.
  18. Phone Spam by pontifier · · Score: 1

    I have been working for the last 6 months on something I call Choicelist that aims to be a solution for spam through any electronic communications medium. once the system is in place, it will be easy for a company to make an internet enabled caller id box that can check to see if a number is a personal number or not.

    --
    -John Fenley
  19. community? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    Sounds like there's a need for a community around this gizmo, where people can trade their scripts, etc.

  20. And for those of us from the UK... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Here are the links that you want:

    Telephone - http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/
    Fax - http://www.fpsonline.org.uk/
    Post - http://www.mpsonline.org.uk/
    Email - http://www.dmaconsumers.org/emps.html

    The first three are pretty effective, but as to how effective a national email preference service can be combatting an international problem... Well we all know the answer to that one.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  21. Re:Telephone answering machine - not good enough by michaelredux · · Score: 1

    The problem with a simple phone answering machine is that it still allows an unwanted caller to wake you up in the middle of the night, or harrass you by calling every ten minutes throughout the day, etc.

    Telemarketers don't normally do that, but many people would still like a system that can block unwanted calls without allowing the caller to bother them by even ringing the phone.

  22. check with your phone company by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Informative

    They may already have the service you want. Qwest (formerly U.S. West) has it - can't remember the name, but here's what it does.

    You get the service, and anyone calling you gets a message saying press '1' to proceed as long as you're not a solicitor, etc.

    The message only plays if the caller is calling during legally-approved telemarketing hours.

    The message will not play for people you've programmed into the system to bypass it - so put your friends and family members phone numbers into the system, and they'll never get the message. And if they do, all they have to do is press 1 right away, anyway.

    Very nice, very simple, about $7 per month if I remember correctly.

    So, check with your phone company - they may already have the solution you're seeking (assuming we're not talking about a cellphone company - I haven't seen this solution from them, yet).

    The secondary defense is Caller ID, of course. That way you can avoid those calls from Mom when you're just not in the goddamned mood to put up with nonsense. :)

  23. NCID by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    Check out The Network CallerID Project, NCID. I've been using it for about a year, and it's very effective. You can use a simple user program to call festival (which I do), and voice announce the name of the caller (or not announce some callers, like telemarketers). If you turn the ringers on your phone off, you'll never be bothered again. The network capability lets my (802.11b connected) laptop display the information too, wherever I am in the house. Great software!

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  24. Re:Telephone answering machine - not good enough by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

    The way to solve this is to replace the ringer in the phone with lights, like they do in on-air booths at radio stations. I can't imagine it'd work with cordless phones, but my cordless lets you shut off the ringer on the handset, so it might work.

  25. Not sure about screening, but prevention is good.. by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

    I've tried many methods of screening telemarketing calls, but the tried and true method is prevention. Why screen if they don't call? You thought it was myth. They thought it was legend. I present to you the Blotto Box...

    --
    This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  26. Rights? by adb · · Score: 1

    Please explain these rights of which you speak. I don't believe anybody has a right to use my phone (which I own) or my phone service (which I pay the phone company for) as the vehicle for their freedom of speech when I don't want them to. They have the right to publish a newletter and offer it to me, put up a web site, stand on a soapbox and yell, to broadcast radio signals, to tell their friends to tell their friends to tell their friends to tell my friends to tell me... but not the right to ring my phone or my doorbell or dump crap in my mailbox (physical or electronic) if I don't want them to.

    1. Re:Rights? by pmz · · Score: 1

      I don't believe anybody has a right to use my phone (which I own) or my phone service (which I pay the phone company for) as the vehicle for their freedom of speech when I don't want them to.

      Thus, we have technological "no trespassing" signs, such as screening calls, those fancy machines that deliver different messages based on caller ID, the TeleZapper, etc. The DNC list really only adds more regulatory burden to both the government and the private sector, making it a lose-lose proposition. Also, the DNC list has political exclusions still allowing trash like charities and politicians to pester you ad nauseum.

      For the doorbell problem, there are physical "no trespassing" and "no soliciting" signs. For the mailbox, there are "opt out" check boxes on registration forms and most companies you do business with. For those that get through, you can enjoy the satisfaction of putting the mail through a confetti-cut shredder.

    2. Re:Rights? by adb · · Score: 1

      None of the devices you mention functions as a "no trespassing" sign. In all cases, the telemarketer is permitted to occupy my line without my permission for a certain amount of time, and both call-screening and the TeleZapper require my attention as well. If there's an appropriate metaphor, it's me having to come out and chase those damn salesmen off my lawn every time they wander on to it, because I can't post a no-trespassing sign and the cops wouldn't enforce it if I did. This law permits centralized posting of a no-trespassing sign (necessary because phones don't actually care about geography) and credible enforcement thereof. As for mail, "opt out" is again a matter of having to chase each individual trespasser off my lawn. There is no way I can tell the post office "don't deliver solicitations"; instead, I must filter through them and make return contact, perhaps repeatedly, if I want any single source out of the thousands of possible sources to stop harrassing me. It is not scalable: the more mail is sent, the more of my time must be spent rejecting it, whereas a central "don't mail me" list at the post office would again be a single, simple act like a no-trespassing sign.

    3. Re:Rights? by pmz · · Score: 1


      No one said that freedom was easy.

    4. Re:Rights? by adb · · Score: 1

      You claimed active defensive measures (like call screening, TeleZapper, and automated call screening) with "no trespassing" signs. I told you why they are different, and pointed out that this law fills the same function as a "no trespassing" sign. You then made an irrelevant throwaway remark.

      The next move is still yours.

    5. Re:Rights? by pmz · · Score: 1

      this law fills the same function as a "no trespassing" sign. You then made an irrelevant throwaway remark.

      My point is that the law isn't truly a "no trespassing" sign. You'll still get the leeches from charities and political campaigns not to mention the three-month delays and probably other loopholes we have yet to discover. The only real protection is that which the people provide for themselves, because the government solution will always be the half-assed solution. The challenge is to find the telephone-equivalent to the gun, and, in fact, various solutions are appearing on the market giving people a variety of ways to tell telemarketers to rot in hell.

    6. Re:Rights? by adb · · Score: 1

      Ah, so what you're actually saying is that there shouldn't be exceptions to the law, not that it shouldn't exist. I agree completely.

    7. Re:Rights? by pmz · · Score: 1

      Ah, so what you're actually saying is that there shouldn't be exceptions to the law, not that it shouldn't exist.

      Well, in a way, yes, but politics guarantees that to be an impossible outcome. There is more blatant racial, economic, and social discrimination in our nations laws than in all of our society, even when considering crap like the KKK.

    8. Re:Rights? by adb · · Score: 1

      "Since laws are never enforced uniformly, but rather give certain favored groups advantages over other groups, we shouldn't have laws"?

    9. Re:Rights? by pmz · · Score: 1

      we shouldn't have laws"?

      No, just not so many of them that we have to seek a lawyer for every trivial decision. For example, the US Constitution is written to be pretty agnostic regarding special interests. The only amendments regarding race or gender dealt with the inclusion of massive groups of people without much nitpicking. It was probably the income tax and prohibition that really started the the whole thing downhill, where people now feel that any minor complaint or percieved hardship can be written away via legislation.

      People don't need a huge amount of help to stay on the straight and narrow; most everything of importance boils down to being able to deal with contracts, anyway. There's enough contract boilerplate out there to fill most people's needs, and, if people sign into things they don't understand or actually believe what a salesman tells them, then that's just modern natural selection at work.

      I'm far from an expert in anything, so I could be blabbering hot air for all I know.

  27. Re:Telephone answering machine - not good enough by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    When my wife was expecting we had a problem with my mother-in-law (who had azhimers) and other morons who would call late at night. My phone company offered a 'ring master' service that adds up to 3 phone numbers to the same line that ring with a different cadance. I got a second number on this service that was not listed or published and bought a distintive ring decoder to separate the numbers out to separate (internal) phone lines. I then broke the connection from the phone line to the rest of the house at a single point so I could prevent ANY of the phones from ringing. An X10 operated relay then switched the lines around controlled by a timer. The result was that during the day the main number would ring anywhere in the house, and the second number went to a dedicated phone. After hours the second number was connected to the house phones and the main number dumped into an answering machine ONLY! If I needed to call home after hours I used the second number (which ONLY my wife and I knew.) If we were BOTH home and the phone rang we KNEW it was a junk call and would pick up and hang up without listening. Since the number was unlisted though we only got wrong numbers on it.

  28. A cool Caller ID software package... by Grant29 · · Score: 1

    Check out YAC. It allows you to take your 56k voice modem and get the caller ID. You can even brodcast it to "listeners" on your network. It can even be incorporated into your TIVO. http://www.sunflowerhead.com/software/yac/

  29. But stopping junk faxes... by lesterhv · · Score: 1

    My number used to be a fax number. I continue to get fax calls -- if I hook up a fax to the line, they are all junk faxes.

    I've tried to ask them to remove me -- and when I asked one of the junk faxers where they got my number, they said the phone company sold it to them.

    Now if only there was a simple way to only ring the phone if it was not a fax call