Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Linux Revenues Expected To Hit $28B in 2008

Posted by timothy on from the in-pennies-it-could-change-our-orbit dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Key findings from a newly completed IDC market study project that the overall revenue for desktops, servers, and packaged software running on Linux will exceed $35 billion by 2008. Additionally, IDC forecasts that while Linux remains a minority player on desktop PCs, Linux penetration in that realm will reach $10B annual revenues, on 17 million units shipped globally, by 2008. A summary of the study is available as a free download from the OSDL."

16 comments

  1. Linux Revenues by vandon · · Score: 1

    They all sell support. Can't really sell the linux and OSS programs, but you can make a killing from support fees

    1. Re:Linux Revenues by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Novell/Suse and Red Hat couldn't possibly sell Linux and OSS for money!

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    2. Re:Linux Revenues by vandon · · Score: 1

      They're not actually selling the linux, they're selling the year or so of priority enterprise class support.

  2. Which is it - 35 Billion or 28 Billion? by mc_barron · · Score: 1

    ...cause the titla and article don't agree.

    1. Re:Which is it - 35 Billion or 28 Billion? by paulatz · · Score: 1

      The article says 35 Bilions.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    2. Re:Which is it - 35 Billion or 28 Billion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $35bn Canadian, $28bn US.

  3. 50% / 60% of the desktop market by remosain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Down here in Argentina .... probably 50% or 60% of the new computers in the market are shipped with Linux on it (Xandros, mostly) It's done to save costs (arround 80 U$S) but its a great oportunity for Linux to grow. Of course, piracy is a big issue here, so of all the computers bought, not a lot of them stay using Linux, but it is still the first option if you want to buy a cheap computer.

    1. Re:50% / 60% of the desktop market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because everyone overwrites them with pirated copies of Windows XP. If I could find a PC I wanted and could save 80 bucks on it for nothing, I would.

  4. Hey, even Gates uses Linux sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://img101.exs.cx/img101/9162/billnDebian.jpg

  5. Comparison please? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

    Like how much Microsoft sells per year, or how much Windows-based software is sold in terms of both the software and support over a given year? Without a comparison, it's kinda worthless, isn't it?

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  6. Wake me up when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake me up when programs like Photoshop, Quickbooks, QuarkXPress and other such professional productivity applications are ported to linux -- and don't give me this gimp/gnucash/(whatever the OSS layout app is) garbage. If these programs could do what the others I mentioned can do, then there would be a mass adoption of them.

    1. Re:Wake me up when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wake me up when programs like Photoshop, Quickbooks, QuarkXPress and other such professional productivity applications are ported to linux -- and don't give me this gimp/gnucash/(whatever the OSS layout app is) garbage. If these programs could do what the others I mentioned can do, then there would be a mass adoption of them.
      Who's that trip-trapping over my bridge?

      I believe you may have neglected to read the headline of this article. That $28 billion figure is just the beginning of what some people might call a "mass adoption." I'm sure you're trolling, since you actually know the names of two of the software products that are poised to begin a "mass adoption" despite having no marketing budget...
  7. How are they counting that...? by ivi · · Score: 1


    Eg, if Hardware cost + Linux-based Software costs = 100,
    are they adding 100 to the sum...?

    Or just the cost of the Linux-based software
    (presumably including Op Sys cost)?

    And - Hey! _ Where is it written that one can't
    sell OSS?!?

    Consider SuSE's model & income from OSS, for one.

  8. Scaled for Price Per Unit? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    The screwy thing about Linux market size estimates and revenue estimates are that so many deployments can be made for so little cost that the total number of Linux installations can be huge and the dollar value of the market can be small.

    This is great for Linux users, not so great for Linux vendors that think they're going to be the next Microsoft or Oracle.

    Customers are getting what they want: the same drastic standardisation and commoditisation in software that they got in hardware.

    Linux vendors are having to look hard at providing true value-added in terms of service or niche applications, integrating with legacy proprietary systems, etc.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Scaled for Price Per Unit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is great for Linux users, not so great for Linux vendors that think they're going to be the next Microsoft or Oracle.

      I dont think that is realistic - Microsoft will become a linux / oss vendor before that starts to happen.

  9. Not bad by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

    Not bad, having in mind that we are talking about revenue generated by free software.

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.