Slashdot Mirror


Ancient DNA Helps Solve the Legend of Giant Eagles

nomrniceguy writes "Gigantic eagles swooping from the skies to rescue Frodo and Sam in the Lord of the Rings may not be just the stuff of legends and fairytales, according to research published in the journal PloS Biology. McMaster University anthropologist Michael Bunce has shed new light on the evolution of the extinct Haast's eagle, the giant bird that once ruled the skies over New Zealand. Weighing between 20 and 30 pounds, the enormous Haast's Eagle dominated its environment. It was 30 to 40 per cent heavier than the largest living bird of prey around today, the Harpy Eagle of Central and South America."

47 comments

  1. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    How does its wingspan compare to the 10-foot monster that supposedly wanders the skies over Alaska?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it was once fact.

    2. Re:zerg by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Roughly the same: "With a truncated wingspan of around three metres, for flying under the forest canopy" (at the higly-scientific conversion rate of 3-and-a-bit feet to the metre). Mind you, they've actually measured the wing-span of Haast's eagle ;)

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
  2. already known by uits · · Score: 2, Funny

    Note that the article isn't about them finding out such birds existed, but just that it was a relative of a smaller bird. LOTR reference + Science article = Front Page?

  3. What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And a sudden explosion of Lord Of The Rings related discoveries? I know the movie was filemed there, but first hobbits and now giant eagles? What's next, we're going to find walking trees?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weren't those called Moas?

    2. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by winwar · · Score: 1

      It's called publicity. Connect your research with the movie and bingo!

      If it is done by the media, well, they suck at science anyway.

      If it is done by a scientist (prior to peer reviewed articles), then the scientist probably sucks at science....

    3. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      RTFA- the Giant Eagles hunted the Moa and went extinct when mankind severly limited thier food supply.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by greylion3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, these critters do exist, and there might have been a bigger sub-species of them in NZ some time ago.. =)

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    5. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by xott · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah, US geography. Every country in the world that isn't America is in a small contiguous region somewhere over 'there'. Indonesia is over 7000 km away from NZ, and the discovery of the 'little humans' has nothing to do with NZ at all. The New Zealand Eagle is nowhere near the size of Gwaihir and his cohorts. This isn't even a discovery, just a little bit of DNA analysis. Haast's eagle, better known here as the New Zealand eagle, and its existence has been known for a very long time. The most common idea forwarded for its extinction is the fact that the original settlers of New Zealand set fire to the entire South Island of New Zealand, killing off its food sources. as for the walking trees; you need to eat the blue mushrooms to see them.

    6. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Have to be pretty big to be like the Ents and Entwives- and a longer life span too....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:What the heck is with New Zealand/Indonesia by hengist · · Score: 1
      What's next, we're going to find walking trees?

      Well, walking trees would explain many of the car crashes here...

  4. AFTER RTFAing- by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the top of the food chain was the Haast's Eagle, the only eagle known to have been the top predator in a major terrestrial ecosystem. The eagles hunted moa, the herbivorous, flightless birds of New Zealand, which can weigh more than 400 pounds. Scientists believe the eagle died out within two centuries of human settlement of New Zealand.

    Gee, this is news? "Predator Species dies out after mankind hunts prey nearly to extinction". Film at 11.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:AFTER RTFAing- by Webmonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the news is an eagle arrived in New Zealand and increased in weight by 10 to 15 times over [a million years], which is very fast in evolutionary terms. Such rapid size change is unprecedented in birds and animals.

    2. Re:AFTER RTFAing- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this fact alone gives much hope to my captive breeding program of giant mice, miniature elephants, and toucan-sized toucans (because some things shouldn't change).

  5. legend? fairytale? by antimatt · · Score: 1

    Not to some people.

  6. Damned interesting science by TFGeditor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Say what you will, but an entire ecosystem with an avian apex predator is damned interesting stuff. Inspiration for a good ScFi novel, to be sure.

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    1. Re:Damned interesting science by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      I was going to say that this couldn't have been the apex predator, but then I thought to RTFA, only to discover that NZ had no land mammals before human settlement. Interesting.

      So its rapid increase in size appears to be a case of island gigantisism. I wonder if the number of flightless species in the area were caused by the presence of this predator in the air?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:Damned interesting science by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "So its rapid increase in size appears to be a case of island gigantisism."

      I suspect this might be the result of natural selection, bringing about equilibrium with the most abundant (and outsized) prey.

      "I wonder if the number of flightless species in the area were caused by the presence of this predator in the air?"

      A fascinating question, that. Another case of natural selection at work? OTOH, among modern species, not many raptors take prey from the air, although it can/does happen. Most prey is taken from the ground, among larger raptors, at least. So, I guess it would depend on the Haast's eagle's hunting method, which itself likely evolved with its prey.

      I love this kind of stuff. It's like a game, a puzzle in retrospect.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    3. Re:Damned interesting science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 years too late - Piers Anthony wrote Orn in the 80s (perhaps earlier)

    4. Re:Damned interesting science by BigBadaboom · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the number of flightless species in the area were caused by the presence of this predator in the air?

      Not the primary reason. The lack of land-based predators is the primary reason. Why bother flying when you can walk around grazing for insects without being in any danger?

    5. Re:Damned interesting science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there were/are bats. But that was it.

      Yep, NZ is interesting in that birds actually filled most of the niches that mammals normally filled in an environment - very cool, and fascinating in its way :)

  7. And it comes with a free submission by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    to the museum of bad art. Sweet.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  8. About 3 meters so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    More or less the same..

    Among the largest flying bird known, this giant eagle had wing span of up to three metres and talons 75mm long.

  9. Existence already demonstrated by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The study didn't prove that large eagles existed. The remains they had did that. All they did was demonstrate that the large eagles were related to much smaller ones, and speciation probably only occurred a million years ago. Comparative genomics is a useful science, but it's not at the point of telling us what an eagle's adult wingspan is yet.

    1. Re:Existence already demonstrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Comparative genomics is a useful science, but it's not at the point of telling us what an eagle's adult wingspan is yet."

      Nor does it tell us the difference in airspeed between the African and European varieties...

  10. Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by barakn · · Score: 3, Informative

    A google search for "world's largest bird of prey" reveals that there's no concensus on which bird is the largest bird of prey. My money is on the Andean Condor, which, according to The Peregrine Fund, "has a body length of 43 - 51 inches and an 11-foot wingspan. The smaller female weighs 17 1/2 - 24 pounds while the larger male weighs 24 - 33 pounds." According to the same source, "The Harpy Eagle has a body length of 35 - 41 inches, a 6 1/2 -foot wingspan, and weighs 10 - 20 pounds. The female can be as much as twice as heavy as her mate." The argument that the Andean Condor, being a type of vulture, isn't a bird of prey is moot: "Andean Condors may kill some living prey."

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    1. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All of which reminds me of a day out driving around in the Meade County South Dakota rolling plains. On a graveled road, running about 40 mph in an studebaker lark of 1961 vintage (good year btw), but then this was in the later 60's, so it was just another chair car then.

      Anyway, I could see something sitting on a fencepost half a mile away, and as I drew nearer, I could see it was a good sized specimen of the American Golden Eagle that might have weighed 8 to 10 lbs.

      As I drew near the post, the eagle spread its considerable wings (4.5 to 5 feet of them, very impressive to me) and literally fell off the post forward, catching itself with a couple of strokes of its wings. Rising up to the level of the open window on the passenger side, it flew alongside me for about half a mile, with its head turned to look me over most of the time, and looking as if it was considering me for lunch.

      Eventually, I think it came to the conclusion that I was either too big to tackle, or in too small a space for it to fly into, and the wings, which had been beating about once every 1.5 seconds making the flight look very easy, missed a beat, then flaired out, along with the tail flicking this way and that as it steered into a stall about 2 inches above the next post top, and it settled in to watch the now new piece of real-estate in its view for anything that moved.

      This birds flight noises were totally covered by the ambient sounds of doing 40 mph on a gravel road with the windows open, the well muffled motor itself not making a noticable contribution to the background noise. I could easily see this bird coming in from behind a prarie dog and picking him off his hole and the dog never knowing the bird was there till it was way too late if there was any sort of wind blowing to generate some masking sounds. And in that country, thats usually the case.

      One of those memories from almost 40 years back up the log that one never forgets, to look an wild eagle in the eye from about 7 feet for a good piece of a minute.

      --
      Cheers, Gene

    2. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      "A google search for "world's largest bird of prey" reveals that there's no concensus on which bird is the largest bird of prey. My money is on the Andean Condor..."

      Uh, condors are scavengers, not predators (birds of prey). Ergo, the harpy eagle gets the prize.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    3. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by jd · · Score: 1

      According to most of the information I could find on Haast's Eagle put its wingspan at 9 feet or above, well above the 6.5 feet for the Harpy Eagle.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      he specifically said, "The argument that the Andean Condor, being a type of vulture, isn't a bird of prey is moot: "Andean Condors may kill some living prey."


      Although he didn't provide a source.

    5. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Some raptors are also scavengers, mostly bald eagles around here. There's a couple of bald eagles hang out at the local dump and lots of them munching away on dead salmon down the road. One example of lots of eagles around here eating lots of dead salmon brackendaleeagles

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man.. you should be a sci-fi writer...

    7. Re:Neither Haast's nor Harpy the largest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although he didn't provide a source.

      Oh yes he did. That was a direct quote from the page he linked.

  11. Condor by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    Condor is largest bird of prey! Yes, they're scavengers but they can take down rodents and other birds!

  12. Haast's Eagle has been known for some time by jd · · Score: 3, Informative
    What wasn't known, until very recently, that it was NOT related to other giant eagles, but to one of the smallest eagles in Australia.


    Haast's Eagle (Harpagornis moorei) has been known since 1872, to be precise, although the first fossils were apparently found in 1871. According to Christchurch Library in New Zealand, the most complete skeleton was found in 1990.


    It is not altogether clear when it became exinct - or even if it did. The last report of a massive bird in New Zealand was in the 19th century, and persistant claims of a giant eagle of comparable size have been made in Canada. It is not impossible that the bird somehow escaped New Zealand and reached the Americas. In which case, Canada would be a logical place for it to go, being relatively uninhabited and much closer in climate to the South Island than, say, South America is.


    Merely for trivia value, the Haast Eagle is believed to have preyed (at least in part) on the Moa (pronounced Moor - there are no extinct mowers in New Zealand that anyone is aware of), was the tallest bird that ever lived, at 13 feet. (The Elephant Bird, in comparison, was about 10-12 feet.)


    The Moa's eggs, however, were about the same size as those of the Kiwi - which is only about a couple of feet in height. (The Kiwi lays one egg at a time, mostly because the egg is comparable in size to the bird itself!)


    However, nature didn't stop there. Not too long ago, a giant octopus, 40' across, washed ashore there. Also, the only known grounds for baby giant squid (yes, the 40' variety) are also in their waters.


    There are also several species of dolphin and whale that are unique to the area.


    Not to be outdone, the Kea is the only known flightless parot. It is also the highest altitude parrot, living as it does at the snow line along the Southern Alps.


    However, New Zealand didn't just produce some of the most magnificent creatures, it also produced some of the sickest, being home to the so-called "Killer Earthworm", a cannibalistic earthworm that devours just about anything in its path.


    It also gets featured in Douglas Adams' "Last Chance To See", in consequence of having one of the rarest - and dumbest - birds in the world, which is apparently incapable of telling the difference between an egg and a potato.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Haast's Eagle has been known for some time by GrumpySimon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ki ora, mate.

      One correction: The Kea can fly. They've got a reputation for being nasty cheeky little buggers who'll quickly strip cars of anything shiny. http://www.nzbirds.com/Kea.html

      The flightless bird you're thinking of is the Kakapo. These things weigh about 8 pounds and there's only about 60 of them left. http://www.kakapo.net/en/

    2. Re:Haast's Eagle has been known for some time by BigBadaboom · · Score: 1

      And another correction: kiwis don't get as large as two feet - a foot is closer to the mark.

    3. Re:Haast's Eagle has been known for some time by Xybot · · Score: 1

      ...Also not to be outdone, the Kea is reputed to be the worlds smartest bird.

      --
      God was my co-pilot, but then we crashed and I was forced to eat him.
  13. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our giane eagle overlords.

  14. USAsians & geography... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Zealand is about as close to Indonesia as Chicago is to Nicaragua (hint: there's a large island called "Australia" between the two)

  15. Avian predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think what could have happened in the Galapagos archepelago, given a few million years: KILLER CANARIES!!! Swooping down to pick off giant tortoises...

  16. Quick changes is a matter of genetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The researchers say, "Such rapid size change is unprecedented in birds and animals".

    They might not know, but significant changes have been observed over very short periods in fish (I hope these count as "animals") -- http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i2/sp eciation.asp

    (Yours truly &:-) (be nice to me and maybe I'll make an account)

    1. Re:Quick changes is a matter of genetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, genesis is the answer, NOT!

    2. Re:Quick changes is a matter of genetics by tritesnikov · · Score: 1

      While that may be true, the site does offer some interesting pieces of evidence that go against what some people consider the absolute truth of evolution. It's always interesting to me that some people hold evolution in such high regard and accuse people who hold to a different theory of being the ones not considering alternatives, especially when there is valid evidence seemingly against evolution. I'm not saying evolution didn't happen, just that there is valid evidence on both sides and that the evidence that backs up a non-evolutionary theory seems to not be heard as much even if it is just as valid as evidence pointing towards evolution.

      --
      "God is dead." - Nietzsche

      "Nietzsche is dead." - God
    3. Re:Quick changes is a matter of genetics by psycho8me · · Score: 0

      There is no scientific theory to challenge evolution. The "evidence" presented by that site and all others supporting creationism is not scientific. The reason evolution is held in such high regard is that it has 150 years of evidence and scientific study supporting it. There is simply no scientific theory to oppose it. It's true. Life evolves. Get over it.

  17. Neither loigcal no grammatical by j_w_d · · Score: 1

    The argument that the Andean Condor, being a type of vulture, isn't a bird of prey is moot: "Andean Condors may kill some living prey."

    Just for grins, what other kind of prey could be killed? While considering this please also explain whether that "may" indicates uncertainty of knowledge stands for "sometimes," as in "sometimes Bald Eagles eat carrion."

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.