XGI Volari V3XT Review
Wil Harris writes "bit-tech.net has reviewed the XGI Volari V3XT card, which XGI hope will compete with the low-end graphics cards from ATI and Nvidia. Unfortunately, it performs apallingly, with blue screens in Half-Life 2 and 10FPS in Doom 3. Whatever happened to all those XGI promises about having a market-leading card? What happened to their dual-GPU technology? This just shows how much catching up they have to do if they ever want to be a player, even in the low-end. Heck, even S3 stand a better chance than them right now."
<sarcasm>
Wow, this card looks great! I think I'll get one of these and install it today!
Then, I'll subscribe to AOL, and pierce my testicles with a knitting needle...a hat-trick of self-loathing.
</sarcasm>
Seriously, how can any company put out a piece of junk like this and expect it to sell?
(From TFA:)
Ahh...that explains a lot.
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
Bombs like this are usually followed with reports of it being a driver issue. Or they might hear the "oh, you accidently got pre-release silicon" or something similar. A company like ATI or NVidia can usually survive a SNAFU like this, I doubt XGI will be so lucky.
"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
Ever since SIS released its remarkable 735 chip-set I've been waiting (with not quite bated breath) for something remarkable from XGI. Maybe since they opened the source on volari they might be good candidates as a manufacturer for the open graphics project it also means they probably can't hide behind the old "driver issues" with out being discovered.
Failing that we have to wait for either Taiwanese ingenuity to produce the goods or the bean counters to shut them down.
In order to save our freedom it was necessary to destroy it.
Many were the days where I played Moraff's World on a Trident chipset... I've got an SIS something-or-other in my desktop. It sucks so horrendously it makes grown men cry like babies.