New Graphics Chip Relies on Reduced Gate Count
absolut.evil writes "HardOCP has an interesting story about a small integrated graphics chip maker from Norway: Falanx. The hardware is scalable and has a much lower power consumption thanks to its reduced gate count. So in theory we could see geforce/radeon style graphics in a set-top box -- maybe even a cell phone. They say they'll have hardware by mid-2006."
Does it run under Linux?
OK, sounds nice. But how much you want to bet that the phones will still cost the same? At least considering how much providers rip us of as is.
Besides, most of those extra chips that this new one gets rid of are stupid crap like cameras etc.
For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
"The hardware is scalable and has a much lower power consumption thanks to its reduced gate count. So in theory we could see geforce/radeon style graphics in a set-top box -- maybe even a cell phone."
Lower Power Consumption==Lesser Number of Gates.
Scalable==More Gates can be Added.
More Gates==Higher Power Consumption.
More Gates==Closer to the Nvidia/Radeon style Graphics.
Leser Gates==Farther away from Nvidia/Radeon style graphics.
They say they'll have hardware by mid-2006.
Does this mean we can just force gamers to switch to this new card to save that 0.0000025% energy rather than fucking around with DST?
If we can actually get cheap phones with decent battery life, and moderate (or even great) graphics, maybe we'll get more competition. Probably we won't, but it's worth a shot.
Also, what prevents me from setting up my own personal cell service on a business campus? I'm not familiar with FCC regulations on this topic.
antipaucity