Slashdot Mirror


Settlement in Marvel vs. NCSoft Lawsuit

GrnArmadillo writes "The official City of Heroes site is reporting that Marvel's lawsuit over the CoH character generator has been settled. It looks like CoH essentially won, though it's unclear what price, if any, they're paying for the victory. The key portion of the brief press release: 'The parties' settlement allows them all to continue to develop and sell exciting and innovative products, but does not reduce the players' ability to express their creativity in making and playing original and exciting characters ... While the terms of the settlement were not disclosed, all parties agree that this case was never about monetary issues and that the fans of their respective products and characters are the winners in this settlement.'" Commentary is available on Gamespot. Glad this is over. This has been pending almost as long as I've worked here.

31 comments

  1. "pendng"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure you work here?

    Sorry, sorry...

    1. Re:"pendng"? by JimTheta · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he's performing well at the expected standard of quality.

  2. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that this is out of the way, how long before we get City of Asia, complete with tentacle monsters, transforming magical girls, rubber suited lizards, and jumpsuited sentai heros? ... not that I'm interested in playing as a tentacle monster. Really.

    1. Re:Great! by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      Hey! I'd play that! Where can I preorder? I can't wait to punish villainy in the name of the Moon!

    2. Re:Great! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      No mechas? Bah, I'm not playing that.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Great! by slaker · · Score: 1

      Please, please go play that, and help to take the anime influence out of CoX. It's hard enough trying to get a western Super-Hero flavor in City of Heroes when every third person who is logged in has character name based on Sailor Moon or La Blue Girl or whatever the fuck else has huge eyes, tentacles and snot bubbles.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  3. Is this really a victory? by KingSkippus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey, I'm happy I can still design my characters to my heart's content, but part of me really wishes that there were no settlement. Part of me wishes that they had fought it out in court.

    Why? Because I'm pretty durn confident that NCsoft would have won, and it would have put an end to this silliness once and for all. As it stands, now we can look forward to other companies suing over this same thing. The person being sued will see this and think, "Geez, NCsoft settled their case, I'd better settle, too," and the company suing gets rewarded with "undisclosed terms" for their bogus lawsuit.

    I also think there's something fundamentally wrong with the terms of the settlement being undisclosed publically. I'd like to know if the terms were something along the lines of, "[NCsoft:] You drop your lawsuit and pay our legal expenses, and we agree not to countersue you or make you look like an idiot in our press release." Given Marvel's semi-defeat earlier this year, I can't imagine that either Marvel's or NCsoft's lawyers would think that Marvel might actually win. If a lawsuit is filed in a public court of law and my tax dollars have to pay for judges and other public servants to process these cases until they're settled, I think the final outcome should be public! Cough it up, NCsoft, what did you agree to other than not changing the costume editor?

    (sigh...) Well, I think it's interesting that Marvel is coming out with their own MMORPG for the Xbox 360. I wonder who's in line to sue them even as I write this? I don't know about you, but I'm going to have a really hard time feeling sorry for them.

    1. Re:Is this really a victory? by chrish · · Score: 1

      DC vs. Marvel as soon as someone makes a Superman or Batman clone?

      --
      - chrish
    2. Re:Is this really a victory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd call THAT a crossover battle worth reading about!

    3. Re:Is this really a victory? by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Batman: The Dark Knight Returns

    4. Re:Is this really a victory? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Only if the DC clones are ridiculously more powerful than their Marvel counterparts and have much shallower characterizations.

    5. Re:Is this really a victory? by slaker · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, there is no-zero-none reason for CoX's costume creator to offer costume pieces that are identical to those used by Marvel characters (e.g. A visor that looks like the one Cyclops wears). There's no reason for CoX's claws powers to resemble Wolverine's.
      If Marvel wants to complain that the creator lets you make a Big green guy with purple pants, that's a bit much. But anyone with a little common sense is going to say those claws look an awful lot like Wolverine's. Out of all the ways claws could've been done, the fact is someone deliberately chose the most potentially infringing way, and someone in a supervisory role at Cryptic obviously approved it.
      Marvel's case certainly DID have merit.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    6. Re:Is this really a victory? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "Watch out! Superman is laying in with a haymaker!"

      Thug loses 1/6 of his health and falls for 3 seconds, then gets back up.

      Ya, in these games, looks are not ablilties.

      And just wait until Supes loses over half of even that low level of ability as happened with the "ED" nerf.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:Is this really a victory? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Well, the claws do come out of the back of the hand, but they're sticking out of little boxes on the back of the hand, and don't "come out of the hand" itself, technically.

      But yes, if they wanted to do claws without infringing, it should have been literal giant hand claws like a bear's or something.

      Although I suppose Marvel will still complain because they duplicate the claws of Hypatia Lee or whoever Wolvie fought in X2.

      This kind of thing, though, will only get worse in the future as more and more capabilities are included in character setup. Witness the ultimate, say, a sketchpad. How are you going to stop someone from perfectly sketching Superman?

      Or a full, 3D builder? Then you could model anything you want. Of course, that may never be introduced to an MMORPG for obvious, dirtier reasons. You think the new Superman movie is being re-done to reduce the crotch buldge now, you ain't seen nuthin' yet!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Is this really a victory? by slaker · · Score: 1

      At the future point where character design can be done with a sketchpad, the controlling agency will no longer be entirely responsible for the infinite possibilities that sketchpad offers.
      A cyclops-like visor, however, is one of a limited number of eyepieces (I think there are around 30) that a user might choose for their in-game avatar. Why is it even a choice, if it can be so strongly identified with a single character?
      Likewise claws: There's only one character in all of comics who has 3 claws coming out the back of his hand (infringement). There are dozens with animal-like claws on the ends of their fingers (not infringement).

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    9. Re:Is this really a victory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man. I want to be the claw dude in the end of Enter the Dragon. Not Wolverine. I want to play some badass, not some pussy with blue hair.

    10. Re:Is this really a victory? by Kelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eh, there's plenty of Superman and Batman clones around. Marvel's got the the Squadron Supreme, a JLA clone invented in the 1970s for an unofficial JLA/Avengers crossover (the same year, DC created an Avengers clone to meet the JLA). Hyperion and Nighthwak are the Superman and Batman characters. Image introduced Supreme (no connection) in the 1990s, a Superman-like character who accumulated many elements of Superman's mythos that DC discarded in the mid-1980s. The Authority's Apollo and Midnighter are very much like Superman and Batman (except for being a couple). Big Bang Comics is all about taking classic comics characters and trying to duplicate the feel of the 1950s stories -- their Superman/Batman clones are Ultiman and the Knight Watchman.

      And so on.

      Of course, lawsuits over clones go back decades. Consider the twisted case of Fawcett Comics' Captain Marvel. He was introduced just two years after Superman, and by 1941 DC Comics had filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against them. It took years, but Fawcett lost and ended up cancelling all their superhero books. Oddly, DC ended up buying Captain Marvel from them, but the trademark lapsed, and Marvel Comics introduced their own Captain Marvel, leading to another legal battle... which is why both DC and Marvel now have characters named Captain Marvel, but DC has to use the name Shazam on the covers.

    11. Re:Is this really a victory? by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      But I also think it's a bit much to say, "Okay everyone, Marvel's done metal claws coming out of a guy's hand. From now on, no one can ever do metal claws coming out of someone's or something's hands. It's totally off-limits."

      I disagree on the visor thing. Does it bear a passing resemblance to Cyclops's? Maybe, but it's just that—a passing resemblance. It also kind of reminds me of Geordi's visor, the cylons' visors, etc. I mean, an optical visor is just an optical visor, and they've been a staple of sci-fi since old-timey movies and before. If Cyclops's visor had some kind of emblem on it that the visor in the game copied, Marvel would have a case.

      I'm sorry, but to me, "...those claws look an awful lot like Wolverine's" isn't a high enough standard to say that NCsoft wilfully stole Marvel's IP. If NCsoft had created a pre-fab character called "Wolverguy" with claws that could instantly heal and that wears a yellow outfit with stripes, then yeah, Marvel would have a case.

      As it is, NCsoft just pretty much said, "Here are some cool bits and pieces you can put together however you want. Go to town!" And let's not forget that NCsoft does monitor created characters, and ones that appear infringing (e.g. a "Wolverguy" that someone created on their own) do get deleted.

      And let's also not forget that even if Marvel had a case, actually going through with it is a generally assholish thing to do. I mean, Marvel is supposed to be about entertainment. If some of their fans created characters that look like their IP in City of Heroes, so what? As long as NCsoft is not encouraging it and taking appropriate action in the cases that do pop up (which they were), what's the big deal? Worst case scenario, why couldn't they have just sent a letter to NCsoft saying, "Hey, those claws look an awful lot like Wolverine's, and we've noticed some characters that we think blur the line between your game and our comics. Can you please maybe modify the design of the claws or monitor the characters created a bit more closely?"

      Oh, that's right, it's money first, then entertainment. Making a killing off their comic books, movies, toys, and licensing rights isn't enough. Now they have to make it from lawsuits, too.

  4. Re:personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are you retarded?

  5. Re:personally by faloi · · Score: 1

    Sure... Except that Cryptic Studios and NCSoft both at least have offices stateside. The race card rarely flies in todays world.

    I'll agree that Marvel thought they had a case, and that (despite what they say) it's all about the money. But I don't think it was racism. There's no need to get more basic than greed to find a cause for the case here.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  6. Gasp by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    the fans of their respective products and characters are the winners in this settlement

    Amazingly enough, that's probably actually true for once. Hooray for the consumer.

    Although I'm sure the lawyers got their pound of flesh, too.

  7. Re:personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What fucking morons modded this statement of crap up to +2? This was about greed, pure and simple. Wow are you stupid; OP and the up-modders.

  8. Re:personally by Ronin_Bic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thank you for being the voice of reason

  9. Re:personally by MaWeiTao · · Score: 0

    First of all, Cryptic is an American company, based in Texas. I don't know the exact details of how NCSoft got involved, but they acquired the company only after Cryptic had begun developing the game. For all intents and purposes its an American game. Secondly, how is this racism? I think what Marvel did is complete and utter nonsense. I think Marvel is full of crap. But it's simply competition. This is no different than what happens in South Korea, Japan or anywhere else. In fact, over there they really do go out of their way to ensure domestic companies have a significant advantage over foreign companies. Will you call it racism then, or does the bias only apply to American companies?

  10. Re:personally by torchdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fact check please. A: Cryptic Studios is the developer of City of Heroes and was the direct target of the lawsuit.
    B: Cryptic is based in Los Gatos, California
    B: NCSoft is NOT an American company. Their headquarters is Seoul, South Korea. NCSoft Austin is the North American branch. NCSoft Austin is based in Austin, Texas.
    C: NCSoft does not own Cryptic. NCSoft is the publisher for City of Heroes/Villains.
    D: It is not simply competition. Litigating another company simply because you have a bigger wallet and can drag a court proceding out long enough to bankrupt a competetor is a hostile business tactic and is/used to be illegal.

    --
    "Don't feel bad for me child; I'm the monster that hides under your bed."
  11. New Content by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1

    This is good news. When I spoke with the Jack Emmert in February, he told me of several features and completed code that they coulnd't release because of "another company having to do with comicbooks, and a court". 8)

    --
    - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
  12. Re:personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think Marvel is totally off base. They just didn't sue NCSoft for the right reason. Instead of going after them for allowing you to create Marvel Characters, they should've gone after NCSoft for copying their rules established in 1984 to the early 1990s by TSR's Marvel Role Playing game. If you go to this website, http://www.classicmarvel.com/ , you will see that character creation and powers are 98% identical to what NCSoft uses in City of Heroes. NCSoft basically took the rules established by TSR and made a videogame out of it. But that's not what Marvel sued about, so of course they lost.

  13. Re:personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't put down retarded people in that way. This guy is "easily offended," which is much worse than retarded.

  14. It changes nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You still can't dress up as spiderman or the hulk. What it does do is stop Marvel getting stroppy if a player does do this.

    Anyway Marvel was screwed if they got away with it as NCSoft own the rights to all Heros/costumes in thier game that any player makes which means they could sue Marvel if they infringed on any of thier characters.