Titan's Lakes of Methane and Ethane
Rob Carr writes "During the most recent Cassini fly-by, the surface-mapping radar spotted what appear to be lakes in the high northern latitudes of Titan. From the article: 'The channels have a shape that strongly implies they were carved by liquid. Some of the dark patches and connecting channels are completely black, that is, they reflect back essentially no radar signal, and hence must be extremely smooth. In some cases rims can be seen around the dark patches, suggesting deposits that might form as liquid evaporates.' At Titan's temperatures, water is a solid; the lakes would be comprised of methane and ethane. The fluids are different, as are the temperatures, but these lakes cement Titan's status in the solar system as the place with the most earth-like weather — except for Earth, of course."
Please?
Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
You are correct, but:
1) The meaning is quite clear.
2) The American Heritage Dictionary sez:
Let's get the slashdot editors to fix basic grammar & spelling before we start worrying about edge cases of grammar
There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
Hmmm, me not know what you're talking about... Basic grammar & spelling has never been issues here. /ha
stuff |
I think it'll be a while before we get any humans there anyway. Why don't we grow the moon, Spore-style?
I remember that when the Huygens probe landed there were lots of pictures of dark areas presumed to be lakes with channels leading into them from higher ground. But the probe landed close to a channel and didn't see any liquid.
Later the consensus was that the channels seen from Huygens were dry channels left over from flows in the past.
The evidence in this case seems to be the darkness (in radar) of the "lakes", which imply that we are seeing liquid Methane or Ethane. So why are these areas different from the Huygens landing site? It is in a polar area (gee I wish we had a second probe now) but most of the heat on Titan comes from internal sources anyway so having the sun close to th horizon won't make it much colder.
In any event Arthur Clarke is looking more right then wrong at the moment, We should be on the lookout for a Methane Monsoon.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
We are pretty certain it has liquid lakes, but it may
have caves as well.
We know so little about our solar system.
I say we drill up there and pipe that methane directly into my Hummer's tank.
Peak oil, ha, who cares?
None at all to explore the solar system. We are wasting money that would be better spent feeding people who are too lazy too feed themselves. I just love democrats, I just got through being berated by my ex-mother in law for being excited about this story and space exploration in general. I guess she doesn't get that we'll have to move out there one day because this planet will be too crowded. She says people need to wise up and stop breeding so fast so we can achieve a stable population with zero growth. What say all of you? Do you wanna give up screwing so smarter-than-thou intellectuals will be comfortable? Just what I thought,Fat Chance.
and see if there's a splash.
Huh, you grammer looser...
Oh, btw, just in case a mod thinks this is a flame: ;-) - that's a wink meaning that I'm joining in on the joke. Sheesh! The things you have to do to for post-modern irony!
bang goes my karma... again...
So how is this:
At age 3, we execute the kids that can't walk and talk. At age 7, we execute the kids that can't read and do basic math. At age 11, we execute the kids who can't do algebra, geometry, 10 sit-ups, 2 pull-ups, 3 push-ups, a quarter-mile run, enough vision for safe driving, and able to carry out a phone conversation. At age 13, we execute the kids who are unable to do basic statistics, basic economics, reasonable analysis of common contracts (credit card agreement, DSL agreement, home lease, car loan...), or any of the age 11 requirements. Also, at any time prior to having children, we execute people for diabetes, blindness, significant asthma, etc.
Like that? It certainly pushes evolution in a nice direction. It changes out fitness evaluation function to once again strongly disfavor the sick and feebleminded, rather than favoring the welfare mom.
"How long till Bush tries to stick a goddamned american flag on that rock ?"
Though I get the political commentary here, but wouldn't we all be happy if Bush funded a mission to stick a rock on that moon?
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
I say that the oil companies will launch an exploratory probe and then report that no methane exists. Therefore the gas prices will remain at their artifically exorbitant high levels.
The W would first determine that weapons of mass destruction exist and then send an expeditionary military force to promulgate a regime change sympathetic to American oil interests.
The range works like this (this is over-simplified btw):
While examining the data from the different automata with different rule sets, he noticed a "phase change" in the patterns of artifial life that came to be given the different rule sets, and found the complex/interesting "creatures" only would exist at around this phase change. He then went on to suggest that the origin of _real_ life may also only come to be where there is the right balance of order and chaos, and suggests that the phase changes seen in physical systems (solid/liquid/gas) are analagous to the rule sets in the cellular automata (Solids = Order, Gasses = Chaos*, Liquids = Right Balance). Finally this puts forward my hypothesis that life may only require liquids to form (i.e. perhaps it's not necessary to have liquid _water_, but just liquid something).
* The chaos of gasses and their simultaneous lack of informational complexity: Think about how with gasses: while there are shitloads of molecules flying about at insane speeds, the overall behaviour of the gas can be really simply summarized with a high degree of accuracy -- e.g. Pressure*Volume=Temperature
Carl Sagan in Cosmos suggested that some where out there, there might be some sort of hard-wired life (e.g. an electronics based life that is a solid), but the theories I mentioned here would suggest that the solid-life forms would not come about (at least not with out an intermediate period of development in a liquid). Finally, it is interesting to think about how life even once it left the ocean has maintained its base in liquids. Are there any examples of life that are more solid than liquid?
Hmmm..thinking I might get modded off-topic, but I think this is interesting and relevant enough to bring up.
The article was titled "Life at the Edge of Chaos" and its by Christopher G. Langton.
On the Cassini-Huygens Home page ( http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.cfm ) we read that:
"These lakes appear to be filled with hydrocarbon liquids, possibly making Titan the only place other than Earth known to contain lakes."
This statement is a bit misleading since there are lava lakes on both the Earth and on Jupiter's moon Io. The Earth's lava is primarily silicon, while Io's lava is primarily sulfur, but remember that on Titan water is considered a rock.
Who said he was Canadian?
Finally this puts forward my hypothesis that life may only require liquids to form (i.e. perhaps it's not necessary to have liquid _water_, but just liquid something).
Diffusion in solids is prohibitively slow. The common molecules that could form information-storing polymers are very, very insoluble in gases. That pretty much leaves liquids. I wouldn't say that life could never evolve without the benefit of liquids, but it could require timescales far longer than the current age of the universe.
I highly recommend the book, "Life Beyond Earth" (the 1980 Gerald Feinberg version!) which discusses some exotic, but maybe not impossible ways that life could evolve (life in liquid hydrogen?)
I myself make no predictions about life in plasmas, Einstein-Bose condensates, non-baryonic matter and so on, since my mother never let me play with them when I was a boy.