Slashdot Mirror


Millennium Technology Prize Awarded to LED Creator

mapkinase writes "This year's Millennium Technology Prize was awarded to Prof. Nakamura of Japan, for invention of white, blue and green light emitting diodes." From the article: "His other inventions such as blue LEDs are used in flat-screen displays, while blue lasers are already being exploited in the next generation of DVD player. 'Professor Nakamura's technological innovations in the field of semiconductor materials and devices are groundbreaking,' said Jaakko Ihamuotila, chairman of the Millennium Prize Foundation. The Millennium Technology Prize is the world's largest technology award, equivalent to the Nobel Prizes for science. It recognizes technological developments that have a positive impact on quality of life and sustainable development."

64 comments

  1. blue led laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so where can one buy these online?

    1. Re:blue led laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      so where can one buy these online?

      Do you work for Sony perchance?

    2. Re:blue led laser by cbdougla · · Score: 1

      I am sure this site will be linked elsewhere but here's one place to get blue lasers. Expect to pay a pretty penny for one though. http://wickedlasers.com/

    3. Re:blue led laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are diode pumped solid state (DPSS) lasers which use a nonlinear crystal to convert infrared laser light into a visible wavelength. Usually these have a wavelength of 473nm. Professor Nakamura was involved in designing a blue laser diode which directly results in a blue laser light around 400nm.

  2. Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. What!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come Conan OBrien is giving the prize?!
    He should be giving that to an US citizen!!

  4. Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is it that every large prize (Fields medal, Millenium Prize etc.) is described as being equivalent to the Nobel Prize? When in fact it isn't?

    The Nobel Prize is occasionally awarded to technologists, or inventions by scientists that were not new science but rather applications. Jack Kilby's Nobel is a perfect example. The Millenium Technology Prize does not carry anything like the history or even the sensibility of the Nobel. For example how is the invention of HTML such a big deal? Compared to the work of a technologist like Norman Borlaug it is laughable.

    There isn't a Nobel for mathematics - one could make a pretty good case there should have been. But there is no 'equivalent' to the Nobel.

    1. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by wakaranai · · Score: 4, Informative

      There have been a number of prizes offered, to try to make up for the missing mathematics Nobel... the Abel, Shaw and Crafoord Prizes.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_prize#Lack_of_a _mathematics_prize

      However, they don't appear to have captured the public or media's imagination, compared to the Nobel (or Fields)

    2. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, creating the web is no biggie. I mean, who uses it anyway. However, that Borlaug guy is just insane. We don't need more food, we need less people.

    3. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For example how is the invention of HTML such a big deal?

      Thanks, you have neatly summed up the term "academic arrogance". I'm not going to argue that HTML is a particularly complex invention, but the impact of this simple idea is probably larger then the research of 95% of the Nobel prizes awarded in the last few decades. Oh no, TBL doesn't have a PhD, and sometimes worked in industry! Despite this, HTTP (even simpler than HTML, yet even more ubiquitous) and HTML evolved over years of his research and development...

      Would it be too blatantly obvious to mention it enabled the publishing of your comment in the first place?

    4. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by morcego · · Score: 1

      HTML was not, by far, a new concept. It was just a new implementation of the hyperlinking methodology, which was in use before, ranging from simple things like product documentation to Gopher, which was the precursor of HTTP.

      Give any "inovation" award to the creation of the HTML show a lack of knowledge that should not exist on the academic field. Giving it a "commercial" award is ok, tho, so maybe it should be listed on PcMag or some other publication.

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you have neatly summed up the term "academic arrogance".

      Oh, a chip on one's shoulder, eh?

      but the impact of this simple idea is probably larger then the research of 95% of the Nobel prizes awarded in the last few decades. Oh no, TBL doesn't have a PhD, and sometimes worked in industry!

      There are a number of Nobel Laureates who have worked in industry, and don't have PhD's. Jack Kilby whom I gave as an example (disproving your academic arrogance theory BTW) is one such case. And yes, there are plenty of ideas that have more impact than 95% of what Nobel Prizes are awarded for. Velcro, fuel injection, Cable TV, microwave ovens and endless others. That does not make these ideas worthy of Nobel Prizes. TBL made a worthy contribution to the suite of standards that are used over the internet. What is more he did it in a way that helped insure its wide adoption. But it NOT a fundamental contribution at a level deserving of Nobel recognition, or a prize touted as being equivalent to a Nobel Prize.

    6. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      Seems that crop development continues, and that maize and rice each have more world tonnage than wheat now. You might notice here at this page link that there are now databases involved, and collaboration, maybe even HTML is involved as a part of a key communication tool, to interrogate and update the database. Do you think?

      http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-01/irr i-cde012406.php

    7. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by nyri · · Score: 1

      Why is it that every large prize (Fields medal, Millenium Prize etc.) is described as being equivalent to the Nobel Prize?

      Fields medal comes with monetary award of C$15,000. It's not a "large price".

    8. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by asuffield · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to argue that HTML is a particularly complex invention, but the impact of this simple idea is probably larger then the research of 95% of the Nobel prizes awarded in the last few decades.


      You're missing the point, by a long way. While it is true that HTML has been a critical part of something that has had a vast impact, HTML itself is nothing special. If it had not been invented then something else would have been used. Several vaguely similar things already existed at the time, any of which could have been minimally extended and taken the place of HTML. The important point here is: it could have been anything. There is nothing about HTML which fundamentally made all this stuff possible; any of the other choices would have done the same job in a vaguely similar fashion. Any good software engineer at the time, working on the same problem, would have come up with approximately the same solution - perhaps better, perhaps worse, but HTML as it stands is not special. It's just the thing that we happened to end up using.

      Obligatory analogy: the guy who decided to build the first cars with throttle and brake controls as foot pedals is responsible for something that has had a massive effect on the world, influencing the lives of most people in developed nations. But while the decision has had a large impact, it wouldn't have been very different if he had decided to use a hand throttle. Just because the decision affected a lot of people doesn't mean that it really mattered all that much.

      In all these cases, you have to consider what the world would have been like if the person in question had not done what they did. If HTML hadn't been invented, something vaguely similar would have done the same job. Lots of other people were working on similar things at the time.

      The point of a Nobel prize (and similar prizes) is that they are awards for something that is intrinsically unique, important, and irreplaceable. They are things which could not have been done by anybody reasonably competent in the field who just happened to be in the right place at the right time. They represent more than felicity and good marketing. If the prize winner had not done what they did, then the world would almost certainly be much worse off.
    9. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Oh, a chip on one's shoulder, eh?

      Yeah, that was a bit inflammatory... but...

      What is more he did it in a way that helped insure its wide adoption. But it NOT a fundamental contribution at a level deserving of Nobel recognition, or a prize touted as being equivalent to a Nobel Prize.

      That's funny, if you read Alfred Nobel's original grant and will, he was more concerned with ideas that "shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind". As I'm sure you know, it's not all physics and chemistry - scientists have won Peace prizes (Pauling, or as you mentioned, Bourlag), rewarding their advocacy and dedication as much as their research. Besides, it's not like the Nobel prize is some absolute scale of "fundamental contribution" as you say - it's as full of politics as any award of its nature. I guess I agree that comparing other awards to it is fairly arbitrary, but not because it is somehow fundamentally "better" than other prizes, just different - "deserving" shouldn't enter into the comparison. Not that I'm even a fan of TBL any more than any other winner of a prize of that type. Going back to my original post, I just thought it seemed, if anything, contrary to the whole concept of Nobel's bequest that TBL's contributions (in technical, administrative, or advocacy roles) would somehow be considered less significant than others when taken as a whole (as Nobel intended).

    10. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the nobel prize laurets also worked on ideas for which time has come and would be invented anyhow. Look at how many shared nobel prizes are given for independently inventing something. Give people who did something simple and important some award - don't judge them saying they did something simple. Simplicity is very important. And, anyhow it is better to give money to people who are still productive than to someone who is already retired.

    11. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to argue that HTML is a particularly complex invention, but the impact of this simple idea is probably larger then the research of 95% of the Nobel prizes awarded in the last few decades.

      The "idea" you're so excited about, is the idea of a markup language, and links, which existed LONG before HTML.

      You might as well grant an award for the format of the Apache config file... It probably took years to reach it's current form, and has significant impact on the world...

      Would it be too blatantly obvious to mention it enabled the publishing of your comment in the first place?

      The format happens to be HTML, but HTML didn't enable the process, or the technology to do it... any more than the PNG image format did.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes but TBL should receive the Nobel Prize for Peace for enabling all these wonderfully calming online discussions.

    13. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by liloldme · · Score: 1
      For example how is the invention of HTML such a big deal?


      Ponder upon that the next time you write a response to Slashdot.

    14. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The "idea" you're so excited about, is the idea of a markup language, and links, which existed LONG before HTML.

      Honestly HTML (and moreover XML) annoys me. But it's damn popular, and it works. Of course markup languages have existed before HTML. TBL was in fact experimenting with markup languages 25 years ago. I'm sure someone else was thinking about it well before that. So what?

      The format happens to be HTML, but HTML didn't enable the process, or the technology to do it... any more than the PNG image format did.

      To be honest, the more important concept was HTTP. Another dead simple implementation. But neither you nor I came up with it, he did. And made it practical. Lucky him. I think that deserves some credit.

    15. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by lahi · · Score: 1

      Calming online discussions (OK, well, sort of - asynchronous online) were possible with Usenet, invented 1979 (according to Wikipedia.)

      All TBL deserves is a kick in the ass for butchering hypertext technology. At that time there was stuff like NoteCards (PARC) and several other projects - including Xanadu. By making the abomination that is WWW a success, TBL assured that all progress in hypertext would be near-impossible. Instead we now have a mess, entangled and ugly beyond belief. Just thinking of the futile efforts needed to recreate a session-oriented protocol on top of the HTTP protocol, this being an effectively stateless protocol despite
      running over the connection oriented TCP/IP protocol, makes me sick.

      No, I stand by my opinion that the world would have been better of if TBL had never touched a computer.

      -Lasse

    16. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I'm sure someone else was thinking about it well before that. So what?

      So it's not the revolutionary concept you claim. It's just a particular implementation that happened to become popular. He deserves credit for the accomplishment, but it's about as worthy of a major award as somebody who modified their car to get better gas mileage...

      To be honest, the more important concept was HTTP. Another dead simple implementation. But neither you nor I came up with it, he did.

      Gopher had most of the functionality of HTTP, so it's hard to see how that is revolutionary either. It's just another improvement. You don't seem to think the creators of Gopher, FTP, SMTP, etc. should get an award.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Nobel equivalent? I don't think so. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Instead of complaining that the Millenium prize is equivalent to the Nobel prize, complain that the US universities are not turning out students who are of the caliber to do fundamental research, or to be innovative.

      Learning to think outside the box is a cultural attribute. It is time to think innovation, and the rest will follow

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  5. Re:What does "of Japan" mean? by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is not a surprise that he had to come to a country founded on enabling individual achievement for his invention to be recognized and utilized for the benefit of all humanity.

  6. Re:What does "of Japan" mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right but why would you even say "Japanese"? Who cares where he is from?

  7. Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I was that clever - I'm a bit envious. If only we had more people like this in the world. Good on you and well done! :-D

    1. Re:Congrats! by Chris+Shannon · · Score: 1

      The article says, "White LEDs could provide a sustainable, low-cost alternative to lightbulbs, especially in developing countries." I think the people at the Light Up the World Foundation should be given some recognition for actually bringing LEDs to those developing countries. It's one thing to invite a technology, it's another to use it to improve the world.

      --
      "Follow me" the wise man said, but he walked behind.
  8. Fields can be considered "Nobel equivalent" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sorry .. but the Fields is Nobel equivalent. You have to make a real significant and standout contribution to mathematics before you can be awarded it. Do you know anything about mathematics??

    And yes and though not immediately .. the resulting math often drives technology. Would the world have any semblence of engineering or computational capability were it not for mathematics? No way in hell.

    1. Re:Fields can be considered "Nobel equivalent" by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      It isn't equivalent to the Nobel because you can still win a Nobel Prize after 40.

    2. Re:Fields can be considered "Nobel equivalent" by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Just based on the provenance of the prize, its recognition, and the monetary value the Fields medal is not Nobel equivalent. And the rules are quite different. You have to be under age 40, and the medal is awarded for a body of work, not a particular result. The intent is rather different too - recognition to young contributors as an incentive. Fields medals also cannot be shared.

      My thesis advisor was awarded a shared Nobel at age 80 for a piece of work he did in his late 60's. Under the Fields rules he was older by a factor of two than the maximum permitted. He would have also been unlikely to get recogntion under Fields rules since it was a bit of a tangent from his main work.

      Andrew Wiles, author of probably the most famous mathematical result of the 20th century (proof of Fermat's Last Theorem) did not qualify for a Fields medal because he was over 40 when his proof was completed. He had to settle for a sliver plaque from the IMU instead.

      No, actually the two are quite different.

    3. Re:Fields can be considered "Nobel equivalent" by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Come on. Your argument is based on unessential technicality. The truth of the matter is that Fields IS the top Mathematics prize, like Nobel in Physics IS the top Physics prize. And that is all to "equivalency".

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:Fields can be considered "Nobel equivalent" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was invented by Alfeurov

  9. Nakamura first to make led, BUT by lhpineapple · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the buffer layer technique was first published by Theodore Moustakas and remains his intellectual property.

    Linky

    I wish more people knew this. He's one of the best professors I've ever had and a hell of a nice guy.

    1. Re:Nakamura first to make led, BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, argueing on the internet is like running in the special olympics.

      Having said that, check out Moustakas' 1990 J. elec. Materials paper. Then check out Moustakas' 1995 1st report of an ECR based MBE GaN pn-diode. Then go to Moustakas' references in the '95 paper and check out the 1991 JJAP article from Nakamura presenting LED results that are better. The lesson is that while Moustakas was the first to figure out LT-GaN buffers, Nakamura made the first reasonable devices, and then he made them not suck, then he made them pretty damn good. Give credit where it's due.

    2. Re:Nakamura first to make led, BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should note this in the Wikipedia article.

  10. A correction by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 5, Informative

    As this is the second time I've read the false claim that Professor Nakamura invented green leds -- green leds having existed since the 70s -- I looked into it and discovered it's another case of sloppy (read inaccurate) reporting. He invented the GaN-based green led, not green leds in general. Technical reporters need to stop omitting words because they're too ignorant to know they're important. I can only guess how many people are now misinformed as a result of said sloppy reporting. Grumble.

    1. Re:A correction by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The first blue LEDs were silicon carbide; the phenomenon was discovered in 1923! SiC LEDs were deliberately constructed in the late 1960s. http://www.sslighting.net/lightimes/features/marus ka_blue_led_history.pdf

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  11. Good. by JKConsult · · Score: 1

    I'm not really a nerd or geek (I'm not technical enough), but blue LEDs are awesome to me for some reason. And I've shown the story of their discovery/creation/invention/whatever to many people, some of whom are absolutely not nerds or geeks, and nearly all of them have enjoyed it.

    Good show.

  12. If u think less people are needed, why not help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're so sure that we need less people, how come you're still around?

    Oh wait, you mean you want less OTHER people...

  13. Woah by Klaidas · · Score: 1

    When I first read the title I though it was this computer dictionary :-D

  14. "who cares where he is from" by dafing · · Score: 1

    I bet he would rather they said he was "from Japan". I know here in my country, in my city, the best sports players, and movie stars are taken by bigger provinces, or countries, and on the news, they say things such as "born in x" and "former x" as if to say we still have a claim to owning their talent.

    By adding that little bit extra, all his family and all Japanese people full stop can feel proud.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  15. I've read about this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hats off to him - He did what people said couldn't be done, and he did it through perseverence and dogged determination and years of hard work. Also, the company he worked for was just a little manufacturer - all the big companies out there wouldn't bother to pursue this, but this little company gambled on him and now they are reaping the benefits.

    1. Re:I've read about this guy by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      but he didn't like his old company. They reaped TONS of money off of his invention, and basically give him jack shit(merit based pay in Japan is a relatively new concept and still not very popular) so he left said company and went to the states to work for UC Santa Barbara....

  16. My reasons of submitting by mapkinase · · Score: 1
    From the original journal entry:
    Good first two choices. Nowadays when there are fewer and fewer real developments of the real basic science, this prize would eventually eclipse the Nobel Prize in its coverage and popularity.
    (First Prize winner was Tim Berners Lee, BTW).
    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  17. A Slight Imbalance by Vash24601 · · Score: 1

    He gets one million euros, eh? So why is it that sports players get many times that, some for just sitting on the bench?

    1. Re:A Slight Imbalance by dreamlax · · Score: 1

      That's not the professor's only income, he gets a salary too (I should hope).

    2. Re:A Slight Imbalance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because millions of people want to pay those atheletes to play a game, because in turn they derive enjoyment out of it, while he is being payed a large sum for something which he's likely getting royalties on, often just for sitting on a bench. Next smartass question?

    3. Re:A Slight Imbalance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > for something which he's likely getting royalties on

      Are you are that he owns the royalties, not the company he was working for?

  18. Saw him lecture once by rjforster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did a PhD at Strathclyde Uni in Glasgow, Scotland[1]

    Shuji gave a coloquia lecture there once, must have been 1998 or 1999. It was just amazing. Given that I was in the photonics department, everyone knew what a bright LED was supposed to look like. Shuji came in, told us about the science in a 'doh, it was so obvious now you tell me' kind of way, then he showed us the toys.
    The LEDs he connected up to his little pen sized battery unit and shone into the audience. Blues, Greens, Violets[2], Whites etc. They were really bright.
    Then he connected up the laser diodes. He shone those onto a piece of white card he held[3] and F**k me but they were bright.

    [1] The bit to the north of England.
    [2] The kind of colour you can't really focus on, really weird, hard to describe.
    [3] We only have mortal retinas after all.

    1. Re:Saw him lecture once by dmayle · · Score: 1

      Off topic, I know, but it might be interesting...

      [2] The kind of colour you can't really focus on, really weird, hard to describe.

      I'd imagine after that sentence that you wear contact lenses. It took me forever to realise this, because I always thought it was everyone, but one day I had a problem with one of my lenses, took it out, and suddenly I could focus just fine on one of those violet displays. Turns out, my contect lenses (like many others) have UV filters in them, and so anything thet lets out a lot of UV light tends to go blurry.

      It kind of makes me worry about all those violet displays now

    2. Re:Saw him lecture once by rjforster · · Score: 1

      > I'd imagine after that sentence that you wear contact lenses.
      Nope. My eyesight is pretty good. Better than 20/20 last time it was tested (which was after my PhD).

      I could be completely wrong but I think the effect is because we don't have many blue cones in our retinas so we can't easily spacially resolve points of blue light, hence blue LEDs look a little fuzzy but other colours look like points. Blue light is detected a little by the green cones so we don't have too much of a problem with blue itself, but as you go further towards the UV only the blue cones can detect the light, hence violet points of light from these LEDs look more fuzzy still.

      I forgot to mention, Shuji also had some UV diodes (and lasers) which he shone onto a flouresing[sp?] card.

  19. Blue LED'S by drewsup · · Score: 0

    Blue LeD's, Oooooooooooooooooooooohhhhh they're sooooo pretty!!!

  20. Death to blue LEDs!!!!! by dangitman · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The blue LED is one of the worst inventions ever. It's getting harder and harder to buy computer peripherals, audio equipment, and other devices that aren't festooned with the damn things. It's become a manufacturer's way of saying "my product is cool!"

    Why do I want my indicator lights to illuminate the whole damn room? They are extremely uncomfortable to look at, and too bright for purpose they are used for. I want an indicator light to discreetly notify me of the status of my equipment. Not blind me. Is there anything wrong with a subdued red/yellow/green LED for this purpose?

    My god, I've even seen high-end speakers for the entertainment industry with these things on the FRONT of them. Newsflash: I want to listen to a speaker, not look at it. Especially when you are using it in a theater - you have to cover the LEDs with tape so they aren't distracting during a black-out or scene with low-level lighting. You fucking idiot manufacturers - why do you think your speakers are BLACK? It's so they're as invisible as possible when on stage. Way to go and wreck that by installing an LED which may as well be an aircraft landing beacon.

    Work just provided me with an external HD enclosure that not only has a blue LED, but uses a plastic lens system to simulate the look of a bar LED-array. Of course, this does not function as a meter of the level of activity. ALL of the "lights" are either on or off. So why the hell did they put a whole row of the motherfuckers there? You do not gain any more information over just having a single point of light flashing on and off. Being bright enough to cause eye cancer does not give me any advantage over a low-intensity green LED.

    Please, won't somebody think of the LEDs? THIS INSANITY MUST STOP!

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Death to blue LEDs!!!!! by rancher+dan+3 · · Score: 1

      Shit dude, two words for you: Electrical Tape.

    2. Re:Death to blue LEDs!!!!! by Efil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're complain is not in anyway related to the invention of the BLUE LED. The blue LED is not invented just to be an indicator lights, man they are too expensive just for that purpose.

      --
      Fine Spot Network: because you deserve a free space. http://finespot.net/english
    3. Re:Death to blue LEDs!!!!! by dangitman · · Score: 1
      The blue LED is not invented just to be an indicator lights, man they are too expensive just for that purpose.

      So, then why do manufacturers of cheap equipment put them all over the place? Even I can buy them for a few cents each if I buy direct from Asia. I agree that the blue LED has other worthwhile uses, but the misuse of them outweighs any good purposes they might be used for. At the moment, 95% of blue LEDs seem to be used to annoy users.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Death to blue LEDs!!!!! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But then I lose the functionality of my indicator lights. It is useful to know the status of a device, or if it has power. But I don't want to be blinded or distracted by them. Indicators are supposed to be useful - and as you imply yourself, because of the abuse of blue LEDs by manufacturers, we lose useful functions, or have to put up with garish glaring death rays everywhere.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Death to blue LEDs!!!!! by linoleo · · Score: 1

      Amen. Add to the gripe list the travesty of making the friggin things pulse and flicker merrily to indicate... sleep mode. These days both my socks are doing night duty as blackout covers for the pointless lightshow on my Mac and cell phone, respectively.

      --
      Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
  21. mod parent up! by Barbarian · · Score: 1

    Okay blue LEDs aren't so bad, it's all the designers sticking them in their products. One thing I really don't like is the tendancy to stick bright blue LEDs in car audio equipment. Hindering a driver's night vision is not a good idea at all. You'll notice that even the old dashboards, controls, and radios that were backlit by incandescent bulbs normally used subdued green, yellow, or orange, and this applied for digital dashboards as well. I do wonder how many people have blue speedometers now.

  22. congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, I'm reminded of my materials science professor in college. He was talking about someone who invented or improved some semiconductor application. I believe it was night-vision goggles. He said "his invention earned the company millions and millions of dollars, and all he got a plaque", and then he said something like "so that's what you have to look forward to as an engineer". Everyone chuckled, and it was at precisely that moment that I decided that I would never work for anyone else but myself (and I don't regret that one bit).

    Anyway I heard someone say something similar about this gentlemen (if I remember correctly, he's never even taken a vacation)... it's good to see that his hard work finally payed off, for HIM. Congrats!

  23. Thank you, Professor :) by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

    LEDs are the most important part of all electronics, especially blue ones :)

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  24. Inventing LED gets name in flashing lights... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Well it isn't the Nobel, and there isn't all the stuffiness, politics and rules.

    Still, this is a forum that gives the industry a way of acknowledging key contributions. What's wrong with that?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.