TAC Files Counter-Suit Against Red Octane
FCifaldi writes "In response to yesterday's report of Guitar Hero publisher RedOctane filing a trademark and copyright infringement lawsuit against The Ant Commandos over their wireless PlayStation 2 guitar peripheral, the controller manufacturer has responded with a countersuit of their own."
From the article: "TAC filed its counter claim in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against both Activision and RedOctane, alleging that both companies are violating Federal Antitrust legislation pertaining to the Guitar Hero game and controller bundle. In addition, the counter claim goes on to allege that both Activision and RedOctane 'copied the identifiable trade dress of the controller from its developer and part owner of TAC, Topway Electrical Appliance, Co.' ... More specifically, the complaint alleges that the controller's design was copied by RedOctane (including its color, shape, and placement of the five fret buttons located on the controller), and that RedOctane developed Guitar Hero 'around Topway's identifiable trade dress.'"
Red Octane's stuid had merrit. I saw that wireless contoller box the other day and I had to look hard for a while to see it wasn't a Red Octane product, it did look VERY similar.
On the other hand, bundling a peripheral that is required to play a game with the game it is used for is standard industry practice (see: Samba De Amigo, some DDRs, Donkey Konga, Sega Menacer, Super Scope 6, etc.). They aren't locking out other peripheral makers. They aren't saying "you can't make Guitar Hero controllers". They just want the box to look different so it's obvious that it isn't a Red Octane product.
This is stupid.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
what did you want the box to look like? Was it NOT supposed to say guitar on it? Also, of course the actual controller is REALLY close to the same. They're made to play the same game. What the hell did they want, a controller that didn't look like a guitar? Disclaimer: I haven't seen either of the boxes.
Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
http://www.topwaycn.com/
Does anyone see anything on the site that is identifiable topway trade dress? Between the completley original barrel bongos and completely original dance pads and the controller (advertised as 'fully compatable with Guitar Hero' even though RedOctane says that's false), I dont understand what they're trying to prove? That RedOctane went back in time from the future where topway controllers rule all to steal the idea?
ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
This lawsuit cannot succeed on those terms. the button colors etc are part of the game, the button layout, in fact the guitar is incredibly rudimentary when you really analyze it. Per the law from Traffix Devices v. Marketing Displays Inc., and the progeny case Talking Rain v. SoBe, when design is integral to the function, trademark protection cannot apply under section 2.e.5 of the Lanham act
this is like... second year of law school stuff
the plaintiffs should sue their own lawyer for malpractice
I read an article in a software dev mag that the developers purchased dozens of guitars and used them to make the game. It wasn't till nearly when the game went gold did they have a custom manufactured guitar to go with the game. So red ocatane has nothing new. No damages warranted.
However, TAC's packaging features a font quite similar to Guitar Hero's packaging. Is that enough for damages?
Is topway the company that made the Guitar Freaks controllers back in the day that had 5 buttons? I'm surprised that either that company or Konami hasn't gotten in on this, although I imagine Red Octane had the foresight to settle that before starting Guitar Hero
The Guitar Hero controller is a complete rip-off of the Guitarmania controller. I think it's a bit cocky of them to do this, when they stole their own game mechanics from another companies game!